that is why the tuc, unison, unite and the gmbc recognise his comments are worthless.riend is speaking well, doesn't he agree there are no mention of environmental rights in this bill and we will have no surety at all around the environment. shouldn't that be put back right? my honourable friend is right and the truth is the damage this bill does to workers' rights is the tip of the iceberg. it will create a border in the irish sea and impose burdens on northern ireland and british trade, something the prime minister promised would never happen. clause 21 makes it explicit, but the prime minister continued to deny it today. what did he talk about? light touch measures to illegal trade and ban firearms, that contradicts what the secretary of state for exiting the eu said at the house of lords yesterday that there will be exit summary declarations. that is what the bill says. the prime minister should read the bill. in addition, the bill will reduce parliament to, i will give way. i thank him for giving way. you can't trust the prime minister and he mentioned the tuc, is

joined by the deputy correspondent you hear han she's standing by at the border town for us in the tuc ish town of july pienaar good to see you you here now we understand of course it is day 4 of this offensive what is the latest where you are. well i'm about 5 kilometers away from the syrian border and now let me show you something on this side here you can see many lights this is the turkish border town of pienaar but on the other side you see that there is a lot of darkness this is where at some point the syrian border starts the syrian border town. now this town has no electricity right now it used to have about 50000 inhabitants but they have most of them have reportedly left the area and now today turkey's defense ministry said that the army the turkish army and their forces have captured that. we are hearing some very different information from the kurdish led as forces they there they are saying that's not true the battle is still going on and in fact there seem to still be clashes because we can hear gunfire and shelling we also had some military airplanes havering us today no

the tuc say, and i quote, this would be a disaster for working people. it would risk every workplace write and leave public services exposed and vulnerable. theby further diluting legal protections for labor and environmental standards, the prime minister has made the laws extremely vulnerable in future trade deals. i could go on, but we should all look at the business -- please forgive me, we are extreme the push for time. what does this mean for business? it reduces access to the markets of our biggest trade partner, threatening jobs up and down the country at a time when more investment is needed, not less. there is no economic impact assessment, no a comforting legal advice. i wonder why, because according to the guardian, britain is on set to sacrifice more than a billion in loss gdp over the next 15 years if the brexit deals goes ahead. access, that market needs a union to keep the supply chains flowing. this deal sells them out. puts the fantasy of chasing damaging trade deals with trump over the needs of our country. again, you don't have to take

listen, for example, do the tuc general secretary who says this -- she does represent an organization that has 6 million members affiliated to it. this deal, mr. speaker, would be a disaster for working people. it would hammer the economy, cost of jobs and sell workers' rights down the river. representative of the british manufacturers. -- the members might care to listen to these comments. "the commitments to trading relationships have gone. under this deal, differences in regulation between the u.k. and the eu, without cost and bureaucracy. our companies will face a lack of clarity, inhibiting investment and planning." listen to the green alliance, who said the deal amounted to a very "sad brexit read from a climate perspective." the message is clear, the steel is -- deal is not good for jobs, damaging for our industry, and a threat to our environment and our natural world. it is not a good deal for our country and future generations will feel the impact. it should be voted down today by this house. i totally understand the frustration and fatigue across the country and in this hous

listen, for example, do the tuc general secretary who says this -- she does represent an organization that has 6 million members affiliated to it. this deal, mr. speaker, would be a disaster for working people. it would hammer the economy, cost of jobs and sell workers' rights down the river. listen to the representative of the british manufacturers. "this is -- the members might care to listen to these comments. "the commitments to trading relationships have gone. under this deal, differences in regulation between the u.k. and the eu, without cost and bureaucracy. our companies will face a lack of clarity, inhibiting investment and planning." listen to the green alliance, who said the deal amounted to a very "sad brexit read from a climate perspective." the message is clear, the steel is -- deal is not good for jobs, damaging for our industry, and a threat to our environment and our natural world. it is not a good deal for our country and future generations will feel the impact. it should be voted down today by this house. i totally understand the frustration and fatigue across the c

you are tuc stuck with no presit pence. and democrats have got nothing done.here is so much oxygen. >> the call is all we care about. the whistleblower report is a hysterical interpretation. we should go by the call, the president said it is perfect, so i am fine. and that is summary of the transcript of the perfect call. >> they will vote like this. kennedy: tom and jessica will switch hats later on. >> if you can believe it. kennedy: party swap, it is fantastic. don't expect to see president trump and adam schiff eat wings and watch football together any time soon. president calling a personal foul on schiff tweeting, why isn't congressman adam schiff brought up on charges for fraudulently makes a statement and reading it to congress, as if this statement, which was very dishonest and bad for me. this should never be allowed. he took it a step further, busted out democrat to english i learn more and more each day, i come to conclusion, what i am facing not an impeachment but a coop. taking away power of people. and their god given rights as citizens of the u

concluded today, this deal does not make the tuc test that any brexit outcome must secure.terfor working people's jobs and livelihoods. would be a disasterfor working people'sjobs and livelihoods. the deal would not require... i am very surprised that the members opposite do not want to hear what the tuc has said about this deal. the deal would not require government to maintain existing rights, would not require rights to keep pace with those across the eu and would leave workers with significantly reduced ability to enforce the rights that they have, and concludes by saying it would do nothing to improve employment rights in the uk now or in the future. so, mr speaker, on the environment, they talk about maintaining world—class environmental standards, but actions speak louder than words. so, environmental standards, but actions speak louderthan words. so, can environmental standards, but actions speak louder than words. so, can i ask the prime minister. i'm not giving way for a while. can i ask the prime minister, instead of entrenching non—regression and environmental s

speaker, you don't have to take my word for all of this, listen to the tuc general sector who says this she does -- she does represent an organization -- she did represent an organization that has 6 million members affiliated to it. this deal, mr. speaker, would be a disaster for working people. it would hammer the economy, cost jobs and sell workers' rights down the river. listen to make uk representing british manufacturers say, and i quote, this is make uk's comments on this deals, members, might care to listen to them, relationships to the closest relationships in goods have gone. under this deal,

speaker, you don't have to take my word for all of this, listen to the tuc general sector who says this -- she does -- she does represent an organization -- she did represent an organization that has 6 million members affiliated to it. this deal, mr. speaker, would be a disaster for working people. it would hammer the economy, cost jobs and sell workers' rights down the river. listen to make uk representing british manufacturers say, and i quote, this is make uk's comments on this deals, members, might care to listen to them, relationships to the closest relationships in goods have gone. under this deal, differences in uk and eu, without clarity our companies will invest. and the deal will relate to a very sad brexit read from a climate perspective. the message, mr. speaker, is clear. this deal is not good for jobs, damaging the industry and a threat to our environment and our natural world. it's not a good deal for our country. and future generations will feel the impact. it should be voted down today. by this house. mr. speak, i also totally understand the frustration and f fatigue ac

. >> tuc >> we promised you a story abou elizabeth warren in the space.. a bizarre moment occurred just few moments ago at the aoc town hall. one of her constituents as she so worried about global warming that we need to eat children. ss for yourself. >> we only have a few months left. i would love to support the green deal, but getting rid of fossil feel is not going to solve the problem fast enough. swedish presser professor sayin we can eat i think your next campaign slogan has to be this, we have to start eating babies. we don't have enough time. all of you, you are pollutant. we have to start now, please. i'm so happy that you're supporting the green deal, but it's not enough. even if we would bomb russia, w still have too many people commit too much pollution. we have too get rid of the babis , that is the big problem. h we need to eat the babies. >> is that real? we don't know. was its parody, was it cleverly trolling? maybe it was. maybe that is just somebody tha believes the rhetoric of the left. either way, what didn't you hear . someone said we

there are neighborhdds tuc into these hills. more we built in, theore could be possibly be impacted. fires are not uncommon in this area, but the more building that we've done, you know, we've come more aware. >> reporter: any idea how this fire strted, jacob? >> the mayor said they're oking into it at this point. usually, it can take time before we actually kno, butu know, we're going to have to wait and see. >> reporter: a there were 10,000 evacuations in thea. are so this was a pretty populated area. >> yeah, there's a lot of places kind of like homes tucked int these mountains. there are also a lot of very narrow rds to get out, so they had traffic issues as well up there. i actually s ait on trail overlooking area recently and i was thinking ths area is primed to burn because there's a lot of brush up there. even though we've had a lot of res here, you can tell the areas that are ready to go because a lot f vegetation is year this past year and thenwet dryness, so everything was ready to go, especially it's so dry by the ti

the tuc say andi union backs this deal.uld risk every workplace right and leave public services exposed and vulnerable. while unite saved by further dilating the legal protections for labour and environmental standards, the prime minister has made the laws that underpin the rights of workers and public safety extremely vulnerable in future trade deals. mr speaker, i could go on, but we should also look... please forgive me for not giving way, we are pushed for time. what does this deal mean for time. what does this deal mean for business ‘s put it simply, for business, for our industries and manufacturing, it reduces access to the markets of our biggest trade partner, threatening jobs up and down our country at a time when more investment is needed, not less. there is no economic impact assessment and no accompanying legal advice, funny that, i wonder why, because according to the guardian, britain is on course to sacrifice as much as 130 billion in lost gdp growth over the next 15 years if the deal goes ahead. industry has

the tuc ourselves back to those initial cases and either we have seen overly aggressive responses to sexual aggression on mine which is a shame and we have seen doing nothing. i hope we don't do that. >> away people communicate is changing rapidly as we all know. you can go viral very quickly. 2016 election showcased how false information can spread and how effective it can be to motivate different populations. often offensive content is shared in groups and then filtered out to a wider audience as leaders what to believere is the responsibility of tech companies to monitor and proactively remove content that is rapidly spreading before being flagged by users? >> i i believe companies need to moderate and remove content when it it is concerning and it's clearly illegal activity. if it's illegal in it's illegal and will like it ought to be a illegal on line. drug trafficking, human trafficking, wildlife trafficking serious organized crime and designated terror groups should not be given space to operate on our platform. i alsoig think cda to 30 needs o be revised to provide more prote

labour interest and that is not what i say, thatis interest and that is not what i say, that is what the tucning to stand again at the next election. but what i would say to them you really want your last act in politics to be sponsoring one of the most right—wing conservative nationalist projects this country has ever seen? which would rip us out of the single market and give us all the sections on the environment and employment, consumer, why would you do that? i do not understand it and i really would invite them to think that the about what they are going to do tomorrow. honey labour mps you know of thinking of that? only one has been cited so far. i would be surprised if any more actually joined him. but, obviously, this is something that people will be reflecting on. it is a big moment for our country and don't think for one minute i say to your viewers who are one minute i say to your viewers who a re royally one minute i say to your viewers who are royally that up with this brexit chaos and mass, don't think that if boris johnson's chaos and mass, don't think that if borisjohnson's p

out by my honourable friend the member for north west durham when she made a brilliant speech at the tuc national health service. yes, i will give way. i am grateful to the national health service. yes, i will give way. i am gratefulto him for giving way. would he agree that the climate and nature emergencies demand so much more thanjust the six words they were accorded in the speech and an environment build that will widely weaken the protections we currently enjoy as members of the eu? will you join me we currently enjoy as members of the eu? willyoujoin me in we currently enjoy as members of the eu? will you join me in calling for a comprehensive green new deal to decarbonise the economy by 2030 so we can show we are genuinely serious about the climate crisis?” we can show we are genuinely serious about the climate crisis? i think the memberfor that about the climate crisis? i think the member for that intervention. i‘m coming onto that any moment but i absolutely agree with her. what we need is a green new deal, a green industrial revolution and we have to face up to the reality of t

listen, for example, to the tuc general secretary frances o‘grady, who this deal, mr speaker would be"this is make uk, comments. commitments to the closest possible trading relationships and goods have gone. under this deal, trading relationships and goods have gone. underthis deal, differences in regulation between the uk and the eu will add cost and bureaucracy. our companies will face a lack of clarity, inhibiting investment and planning" macro. listen to the dealer lines who said the deal amounted to a very sad brexit read from a climate perspective. the message is clear, this deal is not good forjobs, damaging for our industry and threat to our environment and our natural world. it's environment and our natural world. it‘s not a good dealfor our country and future generations will feel the impact. it should be voted down today by this house. mr speaker, i also totally understand the frustration and the fatigue across the country and in this house. but we simply cannot vote for a deal thatis we simply cannot vote for a deal that is even worse than the one the house rejected three