. >> i didn't know that tucker carlsen started the "daily caller" until i read the book. >>>> i think it was scarborough and tucker colson, back to back. the number one media. >> you don't really give up on facebook, though. you say the left needs to push out messages on facebook. but when you look at the top posts on facebook, they are overwhelmingly ben shapiro republican. you clearly think that is the algorithm, but do you think the left can counter that? you highlight the outrage and anger we can use. do you think that our base will share the messages or do you think the algorithm of facebook is so screwed that we have to fix it first? >> algorithms respond to the input. right now the amount of right wing information pumped into the algorithm is exponentially greater. there's more right wing engages, pushing out more content. we are not necessarily going to very quickly close that gap, but there is room. we have to find ways to have messages that are consistent with our political narrative that also go viral on facebook. that's very hard because the number one political posts on f

obtained about where his retirement is now delayed says his tweet, when he was responding to tucker carlsen's comments about women in the army and military cast in the army in a negative light. where is the middle ground where you want your senior leaders to exist and engage on social media? you have folks who are getting hammered for not doing it, and folks getting hammered for seeing and doing it to the greatest extent they think appropriate. what do you want your next general officers to do with regards to social media? >> i think the key with social media -- it is an important obvious information tool. the key for senior leaders in an environment that is as politicized as the one we are operating is, is to exercise good judgment. one of the things i think is most important to general mcconnell -- mcconville and i is keeping it a political and out of the culture war. we have to be able to have a broad appeal. when only 9% of kids are interested in serving, we have to make sure we are careful about not alienating wide swaths of the public to the army. i think we want our general officers on

see the stories of tucker carlsen saying they will take away your manhood, they will make you too feminine. this is something donald trump campaigned on, it was a strategy. he tried to emasculate his opponents, as if being feminine meant you did not have the credentials to do the job, and being masculine made you sick enough to do the job -- made you fit enough to do the job. we have seen men and women play into that emphasis on masculinity as a credential. i worry the more we do that the more we regress to a politics where masculine traits, expertise, are valued over a more general and inclusive approach that would value both things that are stereotypically masculine, stereotypically feminine in ways that would open the door to more women being both respected, recruited, and valued in their leadership ability. i think we are seeing pushback and we are seeing that in the gender debate in policymaking for those to cling onto the idea that there are men and their women and men and masculinity are strong and good leaders and women are emotional and therefore not good leaders. you heard that f

you see news outlets like fox news running propaganda, not just on the tucker carlsen show although he is the biggest propagandist for prudent on that network, but you see it on many of their shows. and you have to ask yourself, whose side is fox on in this battle? and how could you have a wing of the republican party that thinks america would be standing with putin as he conducts that brutal invasion of ukraine. i think american patriotism fundamentally is about a love of freedom. and it's about understanding and educating ourselves about what that means and the duty that brings with it. host: there should be a handheld mic coming, please keep your questions concise. the gentleman in the fourth row. >> hi, my name is nathan and i want to say thank you so much, congresswoman cheney, for fighting for things i hold very dear. ms. cheney: thank you very much. >> my question is for republicans who feel alienated, what is the best path for them to do to promote change? joint a third-party with moderate democrats, stay within the party to effect change from within, what do you see is the bes

it is alarming to see people like tucker carlsen, not only giving kanye platform, but failing to pushwe have seen people in the gop like you. said look, jews are concerned. last year we had the highest number of antisemitic incidents, katie, that we've ever seen in over 40 years. by, the way we are seeing them on college campuses. we are seeing them in workplace environments. we are seeing them in schools. so, look regardless of where you come from in the matter how you vote, antisemitism and all forms of hate needs to be rejected. full stop. >> so what can be done? give us some tools. what can people say and do to try to combat this mainstreaming, as you say, because it's completely tragically accurate of antisemitism? >> we need people in positions of, authority whether an elected official or political candidate or a cable news ponded to step up and say, this is unacceptable. particularly as you are kind of pointing, out when it comes from their, team if you. will we need republicans and conservatives to call out conservative candidates, who fought with fascism and evoke antisemitis

see the stories of tucker carlsen saying they will take away your manhood, they will make you too femininemething donald trump campaigned on, it was a strategy. he tried to emasculate his opponents, as if being feminine meant you did not have the credentials to do the job, and being masculine made you sick enough to do the job -- made you fit enough to do the job. we have seen men and women play into that emphasis on masculinity as a credential. i worry the more we do that the more we regress to a politics where masculine traits, expertise, are valued over a more general and inclusive approach that would value both things that are stereotypically masculine, stereotypically feminine in ways that would open the door to more women being both respected, recruited, and valued in their leadership ability. i think we are seeing pushback and we are seeing that in the gender debate in policymaking for those to cling onto the idea that there are men and their women and men and masculinity are strong and good leaders and women are emotional and therefore not good leaders. you heard that from the call

all the republicans getting your typing -- your talking points from tucker carlsen and fox news, youbut we know what the truth is. why don't you just do us a favor, all of you maga people, go back to your stage? host: bubba in memphis, tennessee, republican line. caller: that last guy seemed awful angry and i take it that he's a democrat. people seem to forget back when trump first started to run for president, people that wore his gear, hats, shirts, was getting attacked and i'm sure it was not trump people attacking them. sarah huckabee got run out of a restaurant with her family, couldn't even eat out. when steve scalise got shot, that was a bernie sanders supporter. republicans don't blame bernie over that. he had no control of it, just like trump has no control of what these people are doing. it seems like democrats are awful angry about something. they just seem to forget how they acted, i remember rand paul and his wife got attacked. there's been recent ones, like somebody said marco rubio almost got killed. a journalist got killed by a democrat. it is both ways but trump has

all the republicans getting your typing -- your talking points from tucker carlsen and fox news, yout we know what the truth is. why don't you just do us a favor, all of you maga people, go back to your stage? host: bubba in memphis, tennessee, republican line. caller: that last guy seemed awful angry and i take it that he's a democrat. people seem to forget back when trump first started to run for president, people that wore his gear, hats, shirts, was getting attacked and i'm sure it was not trump people attacking them. sarah huckabee got run out of a restaurant with her family, couldn't even eat out. when steve scalise got shot, that was a bernie sanders supporter. republicans don't blame bernie over that. he had no control of it, just like trump has no control of what these people are doing. it seems like democrats are awful angry about something. they just seem to forget how they acted, i remember rand paul and his wife got attacked. there's been recent ones, like somebody said marco rubio almost got killed. a journalist got killed by a democrat. it is both ways but trump has no