monarch of russia, ivan the terrible, who destroyed kazan astrakhan, veliky novgorod, yes, pskov, tudiskover peter i, who burned down baturin, who occupied the territories that belonged to sweden, who was st. nicholas ii, who started two wars and lost, and the worst thing is, these are the tsars that he did not win. so bloodthirsty was stalin, the beautiful khrushchev is nothing bad, of course , and the second bad is gorbachev. of course, everything is clear, hungary was also there, but one way or another, he recognized that it is possible to coexist with the civilized world. by the way, in fact, this concept she questions putin’s peaceful coexistence of states with different social systems. he thinks it’s not possible. well, listen to putin. in general, i think it will be some kind of institute named after putin, where putinism will be studied . yes, although it is psychology, military affairs, ideology , duginism, that is, it is crystallized. conditionally speaking, what they wanted all along can be somewhere in the time of dzerzhinsky, or in the time of yezhov, it can be to embrace full