authorities to be linked with terrorism making tuscon this affront to essentially as a second no fly list that's cloaked in secrecy so another secret list but again us please all have links to terrorism but we all know that the procedure the methodology that they come apart come to to get those names on the list is very broken has no no real science and all of them so you could. call and say hey how do i get out of i have up on this list well that's because we can't tell you that you're on the list that's national security you know what's also interesting too is that with this because the u.s. controls you know the database essentially you could be cleared by canada as like oh you're safe you're for and you can go across the border but you could still be detained because the u.s. has controlled the list like you could right you could be cleared by canada because the u.s. doesn't take you off the list then suddenly you could still be detained and listening just bureaucratic well umesh then there is are going to guarantee you this list is not full of people who are blonde hair blue eye

as the guardian to canada's freedom of information act which allude to the american list named tuscon being used as a secondary source of information to canada's already substantial no fly list the don't fly list called the passenger protect program shows known and suspected terrorists were forbidden from flying in or out of canada it is estimated that list one hundred thousand names. however is a different animal especially when applied to canada most notably the canadian government has offered a way out travelers can apply to have their names removed from the no fly list this is not the case for tuscon which has the personal information of six hundred eighty thousand people who are believed to be linked to terrorism the canadians of the database are at the mercy of u.s. officials who have abs. no obligation to foreign nationals so good luck getting off that list tucson also goes beyond the airport centric no fly list and that is also used in every land and sea border in canada as well as visa and immigration applications critics say the biggest problem with american lists of this ki

authorities to be linked with terrorism making tuscon this affront to essentially as a second no fly list that's closed in secrecy so another secret. but. again us please all have links to terrorism but we all know that the precedes or the methodology that they come apart come to to get those names on the list is very broken has no no real science and all of them secret weapons they're going to play ball and say hey how do i get out of i have up on this list well that's come we can't tell you that you're on the list that's national security you know what's also interesting too is the this because the u.s. controls you know the database essentially you could be cleared by connect canada as like oh you're safe your friend you can go across the border but you could still be detained because the u.s. has controlled the list like you can you can be cleared by canada because the u.s. doesn't take you off the list then suddenly you could still be detained and listen just bureaucratic well you mess then there is are the only guarantee you this list is not full of people who are blonde hair b

questions about implementation open i think it's positive that many leaders also make that point to tuscon course and merkel so they are ready to take on this implementation but it's too early to tell whether it will happen let's talk about one of the things that came out in this agreement at the idea of having a camp sort or these the transit camps in northern africa i wonder is there a single nation north african country that stepped forward and said yeah i'll host one of those so far no and this is definitely one of the biggest question marks and even if there was one country then there are still many further questions of how those camps school work in a really legitimate and also effective manner over you know a prolonged period of time so really that's the biggest question mark but at the same time at least in terms of the country hosting it it's not clear yet whether or not one of the other country might be eventually convinced if more is offered by europeans and the signal is certainly in the conclusion that the europeans are of ready to put more on the table all right they're ready