i'm lucky to be moved three times, by the smoky national park, by that tva dam and then by oak ridge. there was a lot of upheaval in that area. from the moment that they broke ground in 1942, to the middle of 1945, less than three years. oakridge wherefrom, you know, pretty much nothing to close at 75,000 or 80 residents using more electricity to than new york city and one of the nation's largest bus systems and it was not on a map. and it would not be on the map until 1949, several years after the end of world war ii. this is why security was so tight. there's a lot of security about having your car off and check. and it reduces those in their a list of things you're not supposed to bring inside. cameras, and there was also prohibited alcohol. this was tennessee in the 1940s, which was like moonshine central. sort of the biggest activities that people have is trying to figure out ways to sneak the local moonshine into oak ridge. and they came up with different ways and everyone can't have these stories. the thing that seemed to work best in the end was actually hiding at the bottom

did that make it easier for him to sort it tva from the other conservatives on the court? >> guest: yes, when i go back to what we were talking about earlier, the politics in the second sense, the philosophy is something that the justices come to every case ways. it's reasonably well-developed. conservative jurisprudence had a well-developed theory about the scope of congress' power under the power to regulate interstate commerce. that was available under justice wrappers. and he deployed a in his opinion. but there was no similar backgrounds in a jurisprudential terms about the power to tax. and so, he didn't have the resources available in his general ideology. i don't want to say he specifically about justice wrappers, but what was available as a purely party political position. that is by 2012, breaking down the affordable care act was the position of the republican party. but if you are thinking jurisprudential he rather than a party political terms, the fact that it is positioned in the republican party doesn't matter and exactly might be a pitcher meant. you might n

government in regulation i talk about local communities which is different for federal censorship but with tvathink the most obvious target should be the advertisers that is what they went after john kennedy and rush limbaugh did they have gone after local people of the right by going after the advertising base to do a truth revolt what i am working with david horowitz to look at instances like the companies that target viewers and say to the dual understand there is a counter effect to you putting up the cash so she could shake her booty on television there is the effect of that and the effect on you and this is what happened in hollywood between 1930 and 1960 the hays code was voluntarily imposed everybody thought it was mccarthy was voluntarily imposed because the catholic decency boycotting the hollywood in mass numbers and they decided they understood where their bread was buttered they decided to use the market power instead of drive opinions. >> host: you write about the motion picture association of america saying that those that rate the programs don't tell us to those people are real

on tva lot of debates about the health-care law. roll ity need to do is back for everybody so they can make it work for everybody. that is what it is for. that a bit of compromise that you're seeing? what are you saying to your member of congress? they need to compromise. they need to fix it and make it work for everybody. and wehe loft the land have to obey by it. let's make it right. wethe law of the land and have to obey by it. let's make it right. what about the american people? the front page of "the washington post" -- we are talking about this potential's shutdown -- this potential shutdown. senator tied a cruise has been talking -- senator ted cruz has been talking all night. next from lancaster, pennsylvania on our independent line. the morning. caller: good morning. behink they should not filibustering in the senate, but that is not the proper way to go about it. i agree that obama care is not the way to go. but i think that this was probably an improper way of getting rid of obamacare. they should go ahead and vote on it.