as far as twitter.y i think they purposefully wrote it to confuse us and so they can pick and choose who gets to keep their account and who violated. so, for now, i mean, i'm just going to continue what i'm doing. i feel like if they wanted me off they would have done it already. they have had so many opportunities. >> tammy: it's great, again, it's libs of tiktok is the handle on twitter. i just want to say thank you because this is really ultimate grassroots and making sure people know what's been going on and you are using the twitter platform to expose what people are doing over on tiktok. if tiktok were to go away because it is a chinese kind of trojan horse, would that upset you? >> if there no. not at all. i think it would be great for us if tiktok was banned in america. it would affect my account because in the long run it would be great. >> tammy: bravo. congratulations. keep going. keep up the fight and great

a lot of people, of course defending twitter. a lot of people well being on the other side of the fence on the other side of the barricades. but one thing a so far, oh, well, one thing that we are seeing so far that there are no indications that twitter will abandon their policy of, you know, giving some people the spotlight and taking the spotlight from others and doing it at their own will even though the company hasn't always been like this, i mean compare the statement of frog or war that twitter is not about the 1st amendment, and that it will not be hampered and all hindered by it. with that something that former twitter ceo, for example, on decker castillo, said up to one of our core values is our respect and defend the user's voice. and we're the free speech wing of the free speech party. we believe our purpose is to serve the public conversation and that does take a stance around freedom of expression and defending freedom of expression as a fundamental human right. so braga wall also has experience serve with microsoft,

a twitter and twitter has already moved about the sharing of photos and videos and paypal with that. their consent uses can i flag in each and they will be removed. the band though doesn't apply to public figures, if tweets are of public interest, but it seems the platform itself. we will decide on that with more on the new boss, hayes, hugo, she done the 1st thing to know about twitter, new ceo. he may be new as well, the chief executive officer, but he's not a new face in the company, per se. this 37 year old man of well indian descent, he joined twitter all the way back in 2011 as chief technology officer. so he has already a long, long history of being an executive within the company has been involved with all the pretty much all the main strategic initiatives with twitter. so it hardly comes as a surprise that this person is well, he is sharing the general line behind that the twitter has been taking the past few years that the well, twitter is bigger than, you know, freedom of speech, the twitter has its own understanding of this term and that it's their backyard and they are,

more concerned about the fact that we twitter. but twitter politicians and other people other people, the media are more concerned about like kyle written house in censoring people who disagree with them. and getting rid of accounts, then they are about the fact that none of the names of the people that have been brought up in a case involving a man who was prosecuted for 6 trafficking, none of which had been brought up on charges. but sure, let's pretend as if this account that just merely kept track of a trial is actually the problem. like it doesn't, honest, it doesn't make any sense. it only makes sense if you're trying to protect those people who are being charged right now. you just touch on something i was going to ask you about the big names. do you think that this silence in could be linked to up? seems alleged connections with elite officials, a couple to name a few. britain's prince andrew, former us president bill clinton as you touched on. yeah, i, i so we believe that because the question has to become, why haven't w

what is getting most backlash is the out twitter gives itself. media would be reviewed on case-by-case basis. our consistent policy includes exceptions to enable robust reporting on news and conversations in the public interest. as a result critics are accusing twitter keeping media on ad hoc basis judging what narratives are allowed to spread and what content users should engage with. some users wonder whether we heading toward a more dangerous future. begs the larger question what role do we want twitter to play in shaping the public discourse. back to you, brian. brian: kelly, thank you. joining me now "the daily caller"'s vince collagnese. thanks for joining us. really interesting story. glad to have your perspective on it. what is your take on twitter's move? is this really security and privacy in your view? >> i think it is very worrisome. it is recipe for tyrannical disruption of the public discourse. we have a black box no one knows how twitter will make the decisions until they're actually made and what i fear here twitter is going to us

jack dorsey is the founder of twitter.e was ceo for two years before he got ousted, which i imagine he didn't enjoy. however, he returned... he came back. yeah, well, he kind of didn't really leave. he kind of chugged along as chair and i think exec chair for a bit as well, and then, in 2015, he did recapture the throne. he became ceo again. and, yeah, he's now announced he's resigning, and he's not really given a clear statement about where he's going, so there's a little bit of mystery around that. but, yes, he's very well known because i suppose he's one of these, like, founder ceos and also he'sjust a very strange man. with his fasting, diet, his beard and all that. yeah, so i suppose he's one of these tech ceos that attained celebrity status, sort of like mark zuckerberg of facebook, now meta, orjeff bezos of amazon. just remind listeners — you bring in meta — how big twitter is today in comparison? in comparison with meta or facebook as we know it, or tiktok. oh, small. twitter's got about, i think, 211 million daily

, instagram and twitter. ., ~ , ., ., twitter.. thank you for watching. we - twitter. thank you for watching. we will - twitter. thank you for watching. we will see | twitter. thank you for - watching. we will see you soon. bye—bye. hello, and welcome to newswatch with me, samira ahmed. are details and recordings related to horrific crimes, such as the death of arthur—labinjo hughes, suitable for the audience of an early evening news bulletin? and has the bbc�*s coverage of that downing street party been obsessive and irresponsible? what exactly did or didn't happen in downing street on 18 december last year remains unclear for now. but that's not for a lack of questions on the part of journalists. here's laura kuenssberg quizzing the prime minister at wednesday's press conference — the purpose of which was to announce new covid measures. how can you stand at that lectern, exactly where some of your team laughed and joked about covid rules, and tell people they must now follow your new instructions? and are you really asking the p

elon showed up at twitter as a special guest a few years ago.lon likes to push the envelope and walk the line. nonetheless, the two of them do get along and they were on a bitcoin panel together a few months ago as well. they are clearly both very interested in the space. they have a relationship, so it doesn't surprise me to see them kind of buddy ying up over a conversation like this. emily: it will be interesting to watch. thank you for some color there. not to the san jose courthouse where the jury is deliberating in the trial of elizabeth holmes . as we were discussing earlier, it sounds like still no word or nothing at all from the jury. is that unusual? >> it's not unusual. i feel a little bit like a spokesman for the jury because i'm getting many emails and questions about what is going on and why i'm not hearing anything. my colleagues are all very on edge waiting for something, and we are hearing nothing. there's a number of different forces at work here. the first is, if the jury wanted to acquit elizabeth holmes, they would have done

, and twitter's stock has lagged.t do you see in the comparison here? brent: i see facebook having a great job targeting advertisers and getting advertisers to spend, regardless of the noise in the news about facebook and instagram as platforms, the roi is still there. we have a couple quarters to get through that. even the vision of what zuckerberg is putting together with the metaverse, this immersive experience we are going to get into and ultimately all of the things you can layer into that, it is exciting. we do not want it all to go digital. certainly, the excitement of what this could look like has so many different ramifications for business models and transactions and i think there is a lot of excitement. no one wants the world to lock down because of this virus, but if we are going to be locked down, we might as well have an interactive internet, a digital world to hang out in from our home. i think facebook has done a better job targeting what is on the next three to five years out. i think it is a combinat

>> i like the question, what's wrong with twitter?r years under jack dorsey actually really made some significant changes in cleaning up the platform, making it not a horrific cesspool of abuse and harassment. that still exists on there, but there really have been significant changes both in policy and moderation and just like on a product level that actually like have made it better. and i feel like we have to give him credit for like -- they actually listened to the feedback and they made changes. i do think that was sort of a moment where jack dorsey really sort of had this come to jesus moment of being like okay, 12k3w4rur7b8g9sz we need to clean up the platform. not perfect but some decent and significant progress has been made. >> correct me if i'm wrong. he's got a little more praise than, let's say, somebody at facebook like mark zuckerberg or perhaps even people like google, the people at google, excuse me, because they own youtube, who have kind of dodged some of the same criticism that facebook has had. you don't see the sa

we are joined by kurt who covers twitter and square.t do you make of his outspoken and combative tweets since stepping down as ceo of twitter? >> has historically been snarky at times. we have seen him not be afraid to go after folks. this feels aggressive because the community around web3 and crypto is so strong, he had to know what he was getting into. he is clearly trying to point out there is going to be a tension between building a technology that is supposed to be decentralized and not owned or operated by any one company and the fact that it is being funded by companies like his own in some cases. i do think there is a healthy tension, but he walked into it knowing it was going to be a tough conversation on twitter. because that community there is huge. emily: this is another twitter exchange with a partner at entries in horowitz, dixon tweeting and saying you are a fund determined to be a media empire that can be ignored, not bonded. he replied that he respected jack and hoped he could bring him around on bitcoin and blockchain.

you don't see the same about twitter. >> yeah.es. and i do think it's -- it's tempting to compare twitter and facebook. and a way that mark zuckerberg, it feels like, you have to pull him dragging, kicking and screaming to make significant change for the better but then he also will make change that's fake and tell you it's better. you know, twirt, it's a little bit of a smaller platform which makes things slightly easier. the scale is not so overwhelming, but i do think that, like, he really did sort of actually approach the problem of my platform is messed up, which is also a business problem for him, not just, you know, a problem for people on there. it makes advertisers want to flee. i think he approached it with, like, some amount of humility and dedication to transparency which is very different from facebook and google. >> let me ask you quickly a little bit about the right here. because he's been at the hem of fox -- sorry, twitter, for just about a week now and yet we see conservatives at fox and other areas in the conser

including twitter blue which was just launched here in the u.s.ith bret taylor both got a blessing from activist elliott management. guys >> we'll see how long it takes to bear some fruit >>> meantime, a settlement between match group and those tinder founders. >> that's right. this is a case that has dragged on for years the trial was under way and it was going to be going to a jury at the end of this week and the last minute they struck a deal $441 million that's how much is going to be paid and it's going to be covered by match to the defendants that part will be paid and the settlement would be paid by match and they say paid with cash on hands and the two defendants are not admitting fault in this deal, which is fascinating to see how they were looking for $2 million they're settling for 441 kind of remarkable considering how much money has gone into this case as it's dragged out over the years, guys >> do we call this alimony, settlement thanks >>> "techcheck" is back in a moment hi, my name is tony cooper, and i'm going to tell you about ex

and say goodbye to the twitter account.may have seen it humorous account takes already publicly published videos from liberals on tiktok and reposts them on twitter for all of us to see. the owner can now have it taken down. the liberal who originally posted it. even though they published it online and should want millions of people to hear, you know, their preferred gender pronouns or the latest climate hysteria. it gives the social media platform even more control, which is scary. more control about what can be shown and more proof that they are, indeed, a publisher and not simply an unbiased platform. we have known that all along with this new rule shows us yet again. big tech censoring conservatives for a long time and we know that now they are coming after you and your phone and your videos if you catch something they don't want other people to see. joining me now to break it all down is missouri senator josh hawley. senator, thank you so much. you have been all over this. this rule change what does it mean for you? wh

also tonight, big news from silicon valley, twitter has a new ceo and surprise, the new ceo is not a big fan of freedom of speech. we have a full report coming up and later, my thoughts on the scandal now surrounding cnn host chris cuomo who has now been suspended indefinitely. plus, dr. oz will join us. he has a huge announcement not about his tv future, but about his political future. he will join a straight ahead but first, our count continues. >> americans held hostage behind enemy lines, day 108. >> sean: day 108, 180 days fellow americans, our friends, our fellow citizens, our allies, their families, that's when he broke his promise 13 days prior to that, left them all pretty much to die, a new report reveals that the taliban terrorists now ensuring the safety of former afghan security forces, the people that helped us over 20 years, lure them out of hiding and then summarily executing or disappearing them in droves. in other words, they are dead, completely preventable human tragedy now on a massive scale, a very real crisis for every single person trapped including hundreds o

at twitter, he just had twitter.here was a lot of speculation, especially when he first took the job at twitter, that he would leave square behind. it is interesting that he has gone the other direction. the ability to build an empire of sorts is probably a big reason why. we saw that today with the name change. emily: they talk about how this name block means a lot of things, like neighborhood blocks and local communities, block parties. would it be a mistake to think this is really a nod to the blockchain and a signal that cryptocurrency will be a much bigger part of the business than dorsey knew when he founded the company? kurt: that is the first thing i thought of. you know that jack dorsey only tweets about bitcoin. he tweets about cryptocurrencies, decentralization. when i think of block, that was the first thing i thought of. they pointed to a number of things that block could be referencing. i don't think it is unfair to assume a huge motivation is this is a blockchain interested ceo. i think there has to be

not only being posted, but also being amplified by chinese officials on twitter.ve to consider twitter is a platform that is banned in china, so this content suddenly appearing showing things happening is strange, anyway. technically you are not allowed to have a twitter account or post on the platform. >> in afghanistan, the taliban have issued a new decree on women's rights. the order says women are not property, but free human beings. it also says women should not be forced or coerced into marriage. but there is no employment rights mention or education. our afghan correspondent has more from kandahar. >> with the rights laid out in this decree not forcing women into marriages giving them certain financial guarantees, these have actually been widely accepted parts of islamic law for hundreds of years. on the ground in afghanistan, many other poor muslim countries have often not been implemented. to give you an example in more rural areas, it i not uncommon for women at times to be treated as peace offerings by feuding families. married off in order to end dispu

where i am a gay man, i was called a greasy bender on twitter and i reported it to twitter and twitter wrote back and said there's nothing wrong with being called a greasy bender and about back giving the exact chapter and verse from the community standards which showed it was unacceptable and so he wrote back to me presumably from california tell me it was absolutely acceptable. to be generous, they did know what agenda was -- i bender was because is not in use of the united states. honestly it might mean to find out why the in the was being so this particular, particular word. in a nutshell, what do you want us to do? what's the most useful thing in addressing the concerns that you have raised here? >> i think forcing facebook -- i want to be clear. bad actors have already tested facebook. they have gone and tried to hit the rate limits. they tried experiments with content. dana facebook's limitation. feeling when a dozen of facebook's limitations are good actors. facebook needs to disclose what its integrity systems are and which languages they work in, and the performance per langu

but interesting sort of very suddenly one day because the hash tag was trending on twitter. and because the crypto markets are now like the equity markets in that there are a lot of bots in august that pick up on these keywords and hash tags on twitter and google read it. but unfortunately, these bots are not that smart and cannot differentiate the context of these hash tags. so in always case, that hash i was trying to on twitter because it stood for african american vernacular, english and people were talking about that. but the boss interpreted ave decline, and then went and started buying spree and pumping the coin up, thinking that there was high interest and bullish sentiment behind that name. and now the very same things seem to have happened to o. m i c. and i'm very sure some savvy traders jumped onto the mean as soon as they saw a lot of the bots mistakenly pick up on that name. so usually the owners of these are their quick to realize their mistake and they reversed that trade. but in, on my case, retail mean traders started adding fuel to the fire, and the rally

not only twitter, but twitter, politicians, and other people. other people in the media are more concerned about like censoring people who disagree with them and getting rid of a cows than they are about the fact that none of the names of the people that have been brought up in a case involving a man who was prosecuted for sex trafficking, none of the leads have been brought up on charges. but sure. let's pretend as if it's a cow that just merely kept track of a trial, is actually the problem. like it doesn't, honest, it doesn't make any sense. it only makes sense if you're trying to protect those people who are being charged right now. it without c on the way you s democrats are losing support from a key group of voters, as polls show the hispanic population. shifting to the republicans will tell you why they're unhappy among all stories. after the break, hulu . watching television. you forget about the carpet, the cartons aside from the living room, and you plug your experience into the tv. something romantic happens. you romantic feelings can

and while inside shops isn't, has a twitter account. my word dots are saturday evening global news round off from moscow programs. they're just beginning, find out what showing wherever you are today and moment. oh has is driven by drainage shaped bankers and of those with theirs sinks. we dare to ask join me every thursday on the alex salmon show and i'll be speaking to yes in the world of politics, sport business, i'm show business.

not only twitter, but twitter, ah, politicians, and other people, other people, the media are more concern about like censoring people who disagree with them and getting rid of a cows than they are about the fact that none of the names of the people that have been brought up, in a case involving a man who was prosecuted for sex trafficking, none of the weeds have been brought up on charges. but sure, let's pretend as if this a cow that just merely kept track of a trial is actually the problem. like it, it doesn't, honest, it doesn't make any sense. it only makes sense if you're trying to protect those people who are being charged right now. another child is making headlines to the u . s. a. chicago jury has found actor jesse smell, let guilty of lying to police and staging a racist and homophobic attack on himself and attempt to boost his career in our faces. sentencing. we've got the latest developments and reaction for you online now at ubs e dot com. it's less of the year to the u. s. midterm elections and pulse suggest worrying, trend full, the democrats, latino voters who showed huge

and it could currency when the twitter feed had a little more than a 1000 active followers. now the cut the currency, which is picker o m, i see that the be centralized treasury back crypto currency protocol. and according to coin market cap, it started trading on november 8th without a traditional ikea or idea or any sort of pre sale. and the point of this crypto is to eventually function as a global unit of account, a medium of exchange currency. and it was actually a for off of the olympics on the arbitrage network. and the team is primarily anonymous, like most dowser decentralized atomic bodies these days. and obviously, christie, the google searches for the word out of crime. we're skyrocketing over the last few days as this all this news broke. so how does it actually translate into interest into a crypto currency? well, the same thing actually happened with ave, a few months back that we talked about all day is one of the top 50 criptos. but interesting sort of very suddenly, one day because the hash tag was trending on twitter. and because the crypto markets are now

oh lauren just mentioned the new see of twitter . he says he wants to focus less on free speech on the plan borman at that point. the 1st amendment is what is guaranteed to as you know, by the government and, and kind of from the government for that matter. and it is also become a rallying cry for alternative platforms looking to gain users, but is free speech a legitimate expectation on social media. these sites run by private companies. first, theoretically, the 1st member says, congress shall make no law and it's incorporated to the stage through the 14th amendment. but let me remind everyone watching years ago during the civil rights era, there were people who said, you can't tell me whom i must seat and who am mas, let in to use the restroom after that lunch counters. i'm a private industry 1st amendment. all of your due process has nothing to do with me . well, public combination laws came along and changed that immediately. and one day when these particular facilities, arg reconsidered, as you tell it he's so big right now. so

your twitter profile simply says... i know it's funny, but it also is in yourface.mportant that it's funny, and it's important that it's also serious. that's a good example of something that's funny and serious. it's funny to describe myself as that. there's something funny about the word — jews use it a lot in comedy. they land on the word. at the same time, there's something deeply serious about choosing that as my identity on a very sometimes anti—semitic platform. it was important to me when i was young in a way that ijust swam in it. i went to a jewish primary school, a very orthodox jewish primary school. becausejews are complicated — not because my parents were religious, that was the nearest school in cricklewood that i wouldn't get beaten up at. it was basically the north west londonjewish day school. so, i went there with a yarmulke and tzitzit and ate kosher and learnt hebrew and all that, and all my friends were jewish. and looked like a religious jew, but didn't believe a word of it? i didn't not believe a word of it, because i was a kid, so i don't thi

ah ah, twitter face is a barrage of accusations that it's doing. the u. s. government's bidding after the social media. john collaborated with a washington funded think tank into spending more than 3000 accounts from 6 countries for state back to propaganda. for the u. k. will college of midwives apologizes for calling mothers postnatal people in new guidance a form and a chest nurse told us a vocal minority has again been imposing its way of thinking. yet another example of stonewall and going in with diversity offices and telling people how to reset the thinking of that man based. and in a landmark ruling, a woman born with a spinal defect, witness her case against the doctor who 20 years ago failed to advise mother, properly about conception. our guests debate the case because what i do now with medicine now in 20 years time, we made george my actions and the doctor has completely wrong. but there is something rather bizarre about somebody saying, and i mean, this is a sensitive like, i wish i had never been born. ah, i the great have you company, than

or do be, you know, facebook or meadow or whatever you wanna call it and twitter have a strangle hold on all of this? well, just really quick. i also want to mention regarding the idea, the 1st amendment applying to social media platforms. there have been rulings in the past that said the president, trump could not block people on twitter because, you know, it was part of the public discourse and open public space even though is privately own. so i think that's definitely important to keep in mind as so many of us are being censored. social media seems a little bit of the critical and like a double standard there, about regarding other platforms and their ability to go on when we've seen parlor very, very quickly taken down by its web hosting services. this is actually been somewhat a blessing in disguise, to a lot of these all tech platforms we've seen being kicked off by web poster and service us a server, sorry. so what this is actually force companies to do is to build their own. so now we have places like add that are entirely independent run, including by payment processors and

ah ah, the headlines here were naughty international twitter faces of biology of accusations that are doing the u. s. government bidding. it's off to the social media giant work with a washington think tank in suspending, more than 3000 accountants from 6 countries for alleged state back to propaganda. the u. k. is a royal college of midwives, apologizes for new inclusive guidelines describing mothers as quote, post natal people, a one former and a chest nurse tells us a vocal minority has hijacked this conversation. is he yet to now, for example of stem role going in with diversity offices and telling people how to reset their thinking fan base. and then the landmark ruling, a woman born with a spinal defect, wins her case against a doctor who 20 years ago failed to advise her mother properly about having children. so in the program, august debate the case because what i do now with medicine now in 20 years time, we may judge my actions, the doctor has company wrong. but there is something rather bizarre about somebody, shane, and i mean this is a sensitive like i wish i would never

carlton, twitter has managed a really neat trick.t is a very popular, very powerful tech platform and it is actually selling at below its ipo price, kind of unheard of. at the risk of oversimplifying, it is missing on monetization, innovation, back end tech is lagging. all i can say at least i have [inaudible]. >> jack dorsey announced this week he is stepping down focusing more on square or what's called block. twitter has about 200 million daily active users not making a lot of money on them. they had to figure out how to do that. on innovation, they tried fleet. that product was fleeting longer in its existence. they launched [inaudible] years ago. that could have been tik-tok. they got rid of it. they needed to get users engaged, help advertisers. on the back end, the platform has been difficult for some users with harassment and things like that. they need to have better tech to moderate those sorts of things. >> i think subscription would be the way. i wouldn't be surprised if the company gets bought out. funny things in the dr

i read through the statement that twitter sent us. when they make the decision to pull a photo or video down they will consider if the image and the tweet text adds valuable to the public discourse or is relevant to the community. those questions are rife to be taken advantage of and using against conservatives. >> it's another instance here of twitter granting itself more editorial power and remaking its app in god's image to be more powerful. >> twitter will decide what should be in the public discourse. >> that's what they are already doing. jillian is right. this feeds into the notion they are creating what is public discourse. it's a fantasy that people think they have equal access to or that it is authentic what we are seeing on twitter. these guys are curating what we see and they will make the determination in addition to the things that she just listed and whether it's covered by mainstream media. you can see what that means. if we are covering something and no one else is because we are the lone voice of reason on some thing

twitters possible ties to the u. s. government ass off to the tech giant suspended more than 3000 accounts from 6 countries, including china and russia, over alleged state sponsored information operations. well, twitter admits decisions on which accounts to suspend were made with the guidance of the australian strategic policy institute. it's a think tank that sponsored by u. s. government agencies, including the department of defense of correspondent ortiz, daniel hawkins dells, deeper into the institutes, activities. it's common knowledge that trusts in conventional media is falling. you know, when you ask someone where they get their news and they reply, audit, watch tv, i'll do my own research or get money's off social media. that's fair enough. at least with normal news, you tend to know who's sponsoring it, be it's a government or corporation. and you can make your own conclusions. but when you see who's behind an organization claiming to be independent and non partisan, drafted in to help provide independent a

a headline, so naughty international twitter face is a biology of accusations that it's doing the u. s. government's bidding. it's off to the social media giant worked with a washington think tank can suspending bolton 3000 accounts from 6 countries for alleged state back to propaganda. the u. k. is royal college of midwives, apologizes for new inclusive guidelines describing mothers as quote host natal people a former and h s. nose tells us a vocal minority has hijacked the conversation isn't yet to know. for example of stem role going in with diversity offices and telling people how to reset the thinking that that members also in the program, a landmark ruling, a woman born with a spinal defect, wins her case against the doctor who 20 years ago failed to advise her mother, properly about having children. so our guests here on the program debate the issue because what i do now is now in 20 years time, you may judge my actions, the doctor has completely wrong. but there is something rather bizarre about somebody saying, i mean this is a sensitive like i wish you would never been with