, because tykhanovskaya, some states of the world recognized her as legally elected. president, it isery important, she forms her government in exile, and this government even works, that is, i talked to several members of the government, they really work, this is not an imitation of work, but navalny's wife is a completely different story, that is, first of all, this person does not have a clear political position regarding the war , the fact that it does not say a special operation, but uses the word war, does not mean anything yet, that is, there is no position on the borders, by the way, what is key, you mentioned the sandwich that navalny mentioned, i will remind you of these words, that crimea is not a sandwich, to return him, his wife does not have any position in crimea, and therefore this is not the direction of cooperation with the good russians that we should support, there are some good russians with whom we really should work, these are the russian legions that go to the rear, who work in the belohorod region, who work in... maybe ukraine, but this is about single people,

, but svitlana tykhanovskaya was a participant in real presidential elections. and probably really won this election? well, look, there is a certain legacy from alexey, and of course it will belong to someone, and yulia already had this idea in the 18th year that she would go to the presidential race instead of alexey, and alexey then... approved this idea, and he was against, well, i think, precisely because of not creating yourself competition, but now a lot of money has been invested in fbk by the same united states and by europeans, it is necessary to preserve these investments, and it is necessary to somehow continue the work of this fund there, and here yulia is such a chancellor. that is, i believe that for the vast majority of oleksiy's supporters there, she will actually be the leader, but how many are there, well, there are probably 30% of generally opposition-minded citizens, whether she will be able to consolidate the other part of the opposition there, it 100% depends on her, well, even there i know her very well, but... i, for example, cannot say what her political views,

svitlana tykhanovskaya, that is, we see, yulia navalna met with biden, yulia navalna spoke in the european parliament, that is, in fact, due to such a tragic, well, event, suddenly yulia navalna became, in fact, well the informal president of another russia, western politicians communicate with her, and those who in the west are thinking of investing somehow. the development of civil society in russia, er, and to talk to some part of the russian community that lives in the worlds, scattered, well, they probably chose her as the main communicator from this part of her united russia, well, well, and no more, well, you know, i personally treat such a transfer of leadership through sexual means with such a certain skepticism, because... when it comes down to it like this from a husband to a wife and vice versa, then well there, it means that there are no other leaders who were popular, well, this, well , for example, the same mark fegin, who invented the election, well, to create some legitimate figure who would talk to western leaders on behalf of another russia , well, in fact, now this idea

and now the wife of yulia navalny, she is essentially walking the same path that svitlana tykhanovskayawe see yulia navalny met with biden, yulia navalna spoke in the european parliament, that is, in fact, due to such a tragic, well, event, yulia navalna suddenly became, in fact, well, an informal president. another russia , western politicians communicate with it, and those who in the west are thinking of somehow investing in the development of civil society in russia, uh, and talking to some part of the russian community that lives scattered around the worlds, uh, well, probably chose her as the main communicator from this part of er-er disunited russia, well er, well, and no more. you know, me personally i treat such a transfer of leadership through sexual means with such a certain skepticism, because when it happens like this from a husband to a wife and vice versa, well, that means that there are no other leaders who were popular, well, well, for example, that but mark fegin himself, who invented the election, well, to create some legitimate figure who would speak on behalf of anot

, and svitlana tykhanovskaya was still a participant in the elections. campaign , that is, the oppositionn to see her as a leader, and as to whom ms. navalna appears, this is a question, yes, and since we are already talking about international affairs, we would like to hear your opinion, mr. volodymyr, regarding the hint of the message from on the part of french president emmanuel macron, in particular about the prospects the involvement of our foreign friends, yes, specifically, when it comes to... the best, most powerful and self-sufficient army in europe, because france has all the weapons technology, quality communication, nuclear technology, missiles, carriers, it builds aircraft carriers, it produces aviation, including military... transport artillery, that is, france possesses all the weapons technologies, and it is a completely self-sufficient country in terms of weapons. it seems to me that france reinforces its firm intention to become, well, such a military leader in europe with a package agreements with moldova. in fact, moldova is now coming under the direct protectorate of

the west, and now navalny's wife yulia, she ... basically follows the same path that svitlana tykhanovskaya walked, that is, we see that yulia navalna met with biden, yulia navalna spoke in the european parliament, that is, in fact, due to such a tragic, well, event, yulia navalna suddenly became, in essence, well, an informal president another russia, with which western politicians communicate. and those who in the west are thinking of somehow investing in the development of civil society in russia, and talking to some part of the russian community that lives scattered around the world, well, they probably chose her as the main communicator from this part of her disunited russia, well, well and no more, you know, i personally feel about such a transfer of gender leadership. way with such a certain skepticism, because when you have to go from husband to wife and vice versa, then it means that what other leaders there are none that were popular, well, it’s sad, for example, the same mark fegin, who invented the election, well, to create some legitimate figure who would talk to western leader

know, american journalistic style, for some reason they believe that zelensky should meet with tykhanovskayaavalny, and they always draw these parallels , in my opinion, they are inappropriate and simply talk about the weakness of the western press, so sorry for this comparison, but the very fact of participation in this event must be considered, well... first of all, i am not sure whether she refused or not , if she refused, i think that the reason is definitely not navalny, but the reason may be different , because now on the eve of the elections in the united states, we understand that the benefit of the administration of the white house is very large, so it obviously makes sense to simply distance ourselves from all these processes that relate to the inside. of american politics and proclaim one simple thesis that we, we are counting on the united states, as a state that professes democracy, values, and many other things, namely, arriving in the midst of the dispute over ukrainian money in the capitalist hills and, as it were, strengthening biden in this way, well, at least that's how it

i think belarus was the first to go through, because we watched the legitimization of svitlana tykhanovskayahe wife . yulia navalny, she is ...

opinion, belarus was the first to go through, because we observed the legitimization of svitlana tykhanovskayawest, and now navalny's wife yuliya, she is essentially walking the same path, which svitlana tykhanovska passed, that is, we see, yulia navalna met with... biden, yulia navalna spoke in the european parliament, that is, in fact, due to such a tragic, well, event, yulia navalna suddenly became, in fact, uh, informal president another russia, western politicians communicate with her, and those who in the west think of somehow investing in the development of civil society in russia, and talking to... some part of the russian community that lives scattered around the world, well, they probably chose her as the main communicator from this part of her disunited russia, well, well, and no more , well, you know, i personally treat such a transfer of leadership by sexual means with such a certain skepticism, because when it happens like this from a husband to a wife and vice versa, then... .. well, that means what, what else there are no leaders who were popular , well, that’s unfortunate, wel

in this, you know, american journalistic style, they somehow think that zelensky must meet with tykhanovskaya yulia navalna, and these parallels are always drawn , in my opinion, they are inappropriate and simply speak of the weakness of the western press, but i am sorry for such a comparison, but the very fact of participation in this event must be considered, well, first of all , i am not sure whether she refused or not , if she refused, i think that the reason for coming is definitely not a bad one, but the reason may be different, because now it is on the eve of the elections. in the united states, we understand that the advantage of the white administration the house is very large, it obviously makes sense. to simply distance ourselves from all these processes that concern domestic american politics and proclaim one simple thesis that we are counting on the united states as a state that professes democracy, values ​​and many other things, namely, arriving in the midst of the dispute over ukrainian money in on the capitalist hills and , as it were, in this way... to strengthen biden, well