host: tyler koteskey? guest: that is a good question. and a tricky one, particularly when we are looking at the ways we assess villages and benefits for our retirees and everything. it gets to a deeper question have not looked more comprehensively at, the broader priority groups for decades now, to determine how we look at this ability statuses and whatnot. let alone additional things like going to exchanges, things like that. it is certainly an issue that is right for reevaluating. host: the wall street journal recently did an article about recruitment for the armed services. it found that the u.s. army is 15,000 short of its 65,000 recruitment goal. u.s. navy, 10,000 short. u.s. air force, 3000 short of its 27,000 goal. in the u.s. marines, hits the target of 33,000. both of your thoughts, i will start with you, mary kaszynski, about recruitment. guest: recruitment has been an issue for many years. it is growing steadily worse for a number of reasons. for example, the policies on single-parent families,