. >> tyler slocum, the issue of the keystone xl pipeline?> it is great that obama mentioned the fact that tar sands feature significantly more greenhouse gas emissions risk than conventional oil and he said that he would not approve the keystone pipeline if it resulted in a net increase of the missions. the problem is that his own state department has already said that it will not result in a net increase in emissions, so at first glance his words sounded great, but the deeds of his agencies and administration says another thing. >> john boehner's people said, only if this does not increase net gas emissions, they said since been no in doesn't, we know that they are born to move ahead. >> this means that the massive grass-roots mobilization that has made keystone, rightfully so, a key issue to oppose, needs to mobilize again. we need to have a redo of the environmental impact statement and the state department conducted. actually, it was a dues-paying membership of the american petroleum institute that controlled that analysis that false the