the case centered on an indiana man, tyson timbs, who had sold drugs and was sentenced to prison. timbs didn't contest his sentence, but he did object to police seizing his land rover. vehicle was worth $42,000, more than four times the $10,000 maximum fine timbs could receive for his drug conviction under ststate law. amy: on wednesday, the supreme court unanimously ruled in tyson timbs' favor. writing on behalf of the eight justices, ruth bader ginsburg said -- "the historical and logical case for concluding that the 14th amendment incorporates the excessive fines clause is overwhelming." the american civil liberties union has called civil asset forfeiture a violation of due process that disproportionately targets communities of color. after wednesday's ruling, the aclu tweeted -- "this will help stop state and local authorities from using people in the justice system as their piggy banks." for more, we go to washington, d.c., where we're joined by lisa foster, co-director of fines and fees justitice center. her group along with others, , filed an amicus brief in the supreme cour