u. a. e. jordan, saudi arabia, all against iran. has us policy in the middle east enabled the possibility of a wider war. well, i think the 1st point, the most decisive thing that's happened piece of the ron is the ron and the kingdom of saudi arabia, of had a wrapper, a flock, they're going to be together, that it seems in the brakes. uh, in this, in large grouping, although without the rape it's not a 100 percent clear that that's the case. but definitely there has been a diplomatic reconciliation of sorts. israel's war in gaza, which has been so much more shocking and devastating than people i would have imagined have really pushed a ron. and the airbag world closer together not farther apart, despite what israel hopes and what us strategy has been. so i don't think that the us and israel can maintain any kind of a coalition with the major eric countries against iran at the, at this moment, israel was making that absolutely impossible because of the israel's extremism. that puts the us in the back foot. these of the china, for exa

u, a. e at jordan. these are authoritarian regimes that have quite, quite atrocious human rights records of their own. their, you know, human rights is not a particular priority for them either for their citizens. much less the citizens of other countries. as so do they are really all about about interest and their own racheal interests. so the survival of the regime. so whatever they think is that it can, can promote that goal, right? and, and conversely, if they see the power steering issue as possibly opposing a threat to their routine, we see a little bit of that in jordan, the jordanians have been the most of vocal probably that of, of eric states in opposing what israel is, is doing. and cause a large part because they are that they have a population that is mostly palestinian and, and the, you know, the, the monarchy there is, doesn't feel of all that stable so. so this is a factor i think for, for eric public opinion. but there's quite a lot of, there's quite a lot of hesitation, people are not a

u a. e, no saudi arabia or egypt or jordan would like to see a middle east dominated by iraq. so this is really a chance that jordan really defended itself and israel, it wasn't all that much of a surprise because jordan has the longest, the 2nd longest peace treaty after egypt with israel. their real surprise was saudi arabia to a certain extent, fox discreetly over the last couple of months. the men ever that with these tried to shoot a rockets. and besides not only add to commercially shipping, but many tried to shoot those into israel. sorry, baby has been very helpful, not only in providing great options, but also shooting down some of those. right. and, and you're saying israel is using the opportunity in your, the beginning of your answer to, to build a strong coalition of density. ron, some people are calling this a new arab israel axis. would you agree with this description by some observe this? i mean, we're not twice. yeah. that so there is a correlation to defend against or anything besides already in place. but what i'm saying is this is a child support as well an

u. s. a for us e k jordan friends in shooting down iran's ariel barriers for that purpose. these were reportedly took up ford of 1300000000 worth of intercept themselves and other materials we hear. that's the us central command forces supported by us. european command destroyer is successfully engaged and destroyed more than a to drones, and at least 6 ballistics me solves intended to strike israel from iran and gammon . israel vows to react to the attack, but the scope and the timing of these from tele agent is still unknown. what's complicates the situation for israel here, lack of support from washington is really prime minister had a phone conversation with the american president shortly after the reading a tag. it last of the wrong 25 minutes on record. say that bite and told me to yahoo that the you as well not to participate in any town to strike against the wrong with the suggestion that further is really response was unnecessary. and i have to say that's prime minister's office is not confirmed as reports, but the fact is that despite promises the attack has not h

a regional war. it's telling us that just isn't happening. and if that's true, why the american air cost based in q 8, jordan the u e capero and so do your radio and they're working to defend is rarely ya sits on the ground alongside their own faces. the u. k. is also intimately involved in this apparently non existent, more actively engaging against iranian air force assets during the attack on the as well. but the spike, this washington is sticking to the story, even when pre of their soldiers were killed in a drone attack in the region. we don't want to see a whitening of this conflict. we don't see this conflict whitening as it still remains contain the gaza on the western media has of course don't. it's best to assist. whitehouse attempts to downplay the seriousness of the situation in the region, but eagerly spinning divided ministrations all as well. narrative, even telling us that the a rainy attack represented a victory for israel. and regardless of what the pentagon on their bosses in the white house tells us. it's clear that the us is up to its neck in the middle east problems. but admitting that during an election year is not somet