u. k. david and others influence the government to change the law and en anonymity since 2005 kids have the right to know their donors identity when they reach 18. in canada, in 2000 and 4th, we persuaded the government to do the same. when people find their fathers or they find their relatives, these are tremendously important stories. and i think they're important for a reason. i think it's a very basic year and then the government changed his mind. the doctors told him there'd be no more donors. and in the u. s. a. well, an indemnity has been standard in the sperm industry since the beginning one. i'll tell i don't have a play with me since the start. everyone thought that the only way a guy would donate sperm is if he could be anonymous, turned out that wasn't true. meet him galaxy. why did you decide to be identified? curiosity, i supposed to start with, but that at some point some portion of the kids would be interested in meeting me and i would be interested, many of them. and so why dod m

u. k. david and others influence the government to change the law. and in anonymity since 2005 kids have the right to know their donors identity when they reach 18 in canada, in 2000 and 4th, we persuaded the government to do the same when people find their fathers or they find their relatives, these are tremendously important stories, and i think they're important for a reason. i think it's a very basic year and then the government changed his mind. the doctors told him there'd be no more donors. and in the u. s. a. well, nobody has been standard in the sperm industry since the beginning one, and i'll tell, i don't have a play with me since the start. and everyone thought that the only way a guy would go on a sperm is if he could be anonymous, turned out that wasn't true. meet him galaxy. why did you decide to be identifiable? curiosity, i supposed to start with, but that at some point some portion of the kids would be interested in meeting me and i would be interested, many of them. and so why not mom? i actually picked, she tells me that's what sh

u. k. david and others influence the government to change the law and en anonymity since 2005 kids have the right to know their donors identity when they reach 18. in canada, in 2000 and 4th, we persuaded the government to do the same. when people find their fathers or they find their relatives, these are tremendously important stories. and i think they're important for a reason. i think it's a very basic year and then the government changed his mind. the doctors told him there'd be no more donors. and in the u. s. a. well, and nobody has been standard in the sperm industry since the beginning one. yep. i'll tell. i don't have a claim to me since the start. everyone sought that the only way a guy would go on a firm as if he could be anonymous. turned out that wasn't true. meet him galaxy. why did you decide to be identifiable? curiosity, i supposed to start with that at some point some portion of the kids would be interested in meeting me and i would be interested many of them. and so why not mom

u. k. david and others influence the government to change the law. and in anonymity since 2005 kids have the right to know their donors identity when they reach 18. in canada, in 2000 and 4th, we persuaded the government to do the same when people find their fathers or they find their relatives. these are tremendously important stories and i think they're important for a reason. i think it's a very basic yearning. then the government changed his mind. the doctors told him there'd be no more donors. and in the u. s. a. well, an image has been standard in the sperm industry since the beginning one. and i'll tell, i don't have a play with me since the start, and everyone's thought that the only way a guy would donate sperm is if he could be anonymous. turned out that wasn't true. meet tim galaxy. why did you decide to be identifiable? curiosity, i supposed to start with that at some point some portion of the kids would be interested in meeting me and i would be interested many of them. and so why not? well, model actually picked, she tells me that's wha

u. k. david and others influence the government to change the law and end anonymity . since 2005 kids have the right to know their don't as identity when they reach 18 . in canada, in 2000 and 4th, we persuaded the government to do the same when people find their fathers or they find their relatives. these are tremendously important stories and i think they're important for a reason. i think it's a very basic year and then the government changed his mind. the doctors told him there'd be no more donors and in the us a well. and nobody has been standard in the sperm industry since the beginning one. and i'll tell, i don't have a plan for me since the start, everyone's thought that the only way a guy would donate sperm is if he could be anonymous, turned out that wasn't true. tim galaxy. why did you decide to be identified? curiosity, i supposed to start with, but that at some point some portion of the kids would be interested in meeting me and i would be interested many of them. and so why not? my model actually picked. she tells me that's what she picked him because his

u. k. it's what drugs are his autobiography, not on cut shots, a scandalous history of u. k. drug policy as a virtual class war professor david david, thanks so much for coming back on even before i get to the amazing book with so many insights a say your take, i know it's not your direct field given that you will feel the pharmacology on, on the british government's response to the current of spending. it seems to me it's almost as chaotic as a response to drugs. and it fails or has partially felt for the same reason. they don't have a systematic structure for making decisions. and then of course, why has the health service become overrun, whereas in most other countries in europe, it wasn't overrun because we basically been undermining our health service for decades. and of course, breakfast also encouraged about 200000 health workers to leave. and i did give her medical agency as they keep saying the vaccines agency that allowed us to vaccinate more than we were being yes. yeah. this got you raise a really interesting question. let's look, can't do it today, but let's look and see what, what was better, how we actually sav

u. k, it's not 100 percent. we spoke to david navarro in the week, the world health organization, special envoy for cove. it about how best to manage the risk of coven? at the moment, we can be 100 percent, certain vaccines that we have at the moment will protect us against all possible versions of this virus. so therefore, we should be accepting vaccines will reduce our risk of getting coven, quite honestly, actually box. they're not going to guarantee and therefore, what we're saying is huge vaccines as part of your control effort. but also, why not just keep going with the physical distancing the one me to row? why not keep going with mar, squaring? why not keep going with really good hygiene? why not keep going with isolation when you're sick? why not keep going with protecting elderly people and those who got other diseases potentially with the back scenes because they are really good protected if there is the perception conveyed to the population of any country that basically we're all going to say, we're going to break the

u. k. drug policy, as virtual class war professor david. david, thanks so much for coming back on even before i get to the amazing book with so many insights of a say, your take. i know it's not your direct field a given the you will feel the pharmacology on, on the british government's response to the current of spending. it seems to me it's almost as chaotic as a response to drugs. and it fails or has partially felt for the same reasons, but don't have a systematic structure for making decisions. and then of course, why has the health service become overrun? whereas in most other countries in europe, it wasn't overrun because we basically been undermining that health service for decades. and of course breakfast also encouraged about 200000 health workers to leave i.

david cameron's lobbying allegations. how corrupt has the johnson governments response to corona virus? been in your estimation until this government came along. i had never dad call a u. k. government corrupt i was busy and that was a pretty i'm well, i think today because it was got to be pretty risky with regard to the locals. and frankly, i don't think anyone has any concern about quoting this government crop. now, because the evidence today over whelming, this government is pursuing its business in a fashion that is corrupted, favoring its own ministers. on some occasions with contracts, mat hancock got a contract from his own department from which he benefit something which by any reasonable definition of corruption might be involved in anti corruption campaign in some way for 2 decades. anyone would say it's unacceptable. we see form administered lobby in ways that would be unacceptable. in many countries, we see bar as johnson frankly distorting. the true telling lies slowly without apparently any concern knowing that he will be found out and appears to be indifferent to the consequences. so this is a government that is, in my opinion, absolutely rotten to the ca