u. k. independence party. joining us here on archie is national for all the way from moscow. a very good evening to you. so welcome to the program. it's good to have you with us. russia is essentially reaching out to nato with an olive branch when you consider this list of proposals for a sense of de escalation. would you in any way perhaps expect for the a western professional partners to reciprocate? well, i would hope so. i'm holding hope though, because look, the criminal a behaving like grown up to you. we know that there's a problem. we know that a classically to the older i would say over the past decade actually. and i would say that the relations are the distrust between nato and russia. it's a low point, probably where the any point since the cold war. so something has to be done. the criminal is reaching out by your grown up and saying, let's get round a table. let's discuss best of course proposals that brochure to put out no negotiation. so let's do a neutral country. let's come to an agreement and step away from the practices of what possibly can be catastrophic

independence of the un system. the fact is, the u. k and sweden accepted to be parties to a 16 month process. 16 months of litigation before the working group, one arbitrary detention i made submissions. the u. k. responded in the process to those submission. sweden responded to those submissions, formerly as a party to the proceedings, they lost buquet. los sweden lost it, lost at the highest level. ah, [000:00:00;00] with no, will i reject the finding of this working group? it's a group made up of lay people, not lawyers, and they are there. a conclusion is flawed in law. julia massage is a fugitive from justice. he's hiding from justice in the dorian embassy. he can come out onto the pavement any time he chooses, he's not being detained by us. frankly, a ridiculous finding by the working group. and we rejected the jewish with we were talking to the former un repertoire, an arbitrary detention last and in us, no country likes to to get a ruling for arbitrated tension to be sanctioned by you and like this. but if you don't abide by it, you fall into the category of con

independence of the un system. the fact is, the u. k and sweden, except to be parties. so a 16 month process, 16 months of litigation before the working group, when arbitrary attention. i made submissions the u. k. responded in the process to those submission. sweden responded to those submissions, formally as a party to the proceedings. they lost buquet, los sweden, lost it, lost at the highest level. i'm with a will i reject the finding of this working group? it's a group made up of late people, not lawyers and they are there. a conclusion is flawed in law. julia massage is a fugitive from justice. he's hiding from justice in the dorian embassy. he can come out onto the placement anytime he chooses. he's not being detained by us. frankly, a ridiculous finding by the working group and we reject it with we're talking to the former un repertoire, an arbitrary detention not sounding us. no country likes to get to rooting for arbitrated tension to be censured by you unlike this. but if you don't to buy it, you fall into the category of countries. we don't like to compare o

independence of the un system. the fact is, the u. k and sweden accepted to be parties to a 16 month process. 16 months of litigation before the working group went arbitrate attention. i made submissions. the u. k. responded in the process to those submission. sweden responded to those submissions, formerly as a party to the proceedings. they lost buquet, los sweden, lost it last at the highest level. ah, with do i reject the finding of this working group? it's a group made up of late people, not lawyers and they are there. a conclusion is flawed in law. julia massage is a fugitive from justice. he's hiding justice in the dorian embassy. he can come out onto the pavement anytime he chooses. he's not being detained by frankly, a ridiculous finding by the working group. and we rejected judicially. we're talking to the former un repertoire, an arbitrary detention ma signed in a new country, likes to get to rooting for arbitrary tension to be attention body. you unlike this? but if you don't divide by it, you fall into the category of countries. we don't like to compare our

independent parties of scrutinized information, the u. s. assurances about assange being kept in solitary confinement and in a maximum security prison. and they have reached their own conclusions, bought the u. k. except that the united states has an independent legal system. so really, how much further can these arguments go about this being politically motivated or whether assange can be, it will be treated fairly is likely to make much of a difference. well, one thing was left out in europe unless as before i came here, that's the fact that if it goes to the magistrate court, there is an opportunity to for julia's lawyer. and julian to appeal the new decision in entirety. so there we will hear the full arguments hold the political nature, office of prosecution or persecution, i should say, the full nature of the violations. cont, julian's and his rights in the entire process of spying on his lawyers stealing legal material, breaking into legal office and planning to kick knob or even assassinate julian. lessons or list will be presented than in the appeal process. initiated by julians lawyers. and that should, in any, no normal circumstances change the opinion of the courts in britain could