u. k. model for the scottish national party. good afternoon to you . so thanks so much for joining us here today. what do you make of this, this exodus from number 10? a? is it the beginning of the air force johnson, or is it just going to be another case of water off a duck's back when they go home is full and it's, you know, up to 5. but it sounds like it rewarded ducks back. unfortunately for this johnson, the doubles of the to any party or this is sort of the guys used to take them that under about maybe touching up a little bit and finding their spine. so i think the letter should be going in the feeling that more pronounced it over the last 2448 hours about as jones's time as number, and he's really hitting the nail into is already well nailed coffin. i think the last one was this me on the liberty to hear stammer over jimmy saw them there that stuck in an awful lot of people's cars. turn the stomachs and the fact that you didn't depaula james. and it's still tied to leave this be a sort of impact, told me some of the muslim stick. instead of the

u. k. 2 model, anti bullying did nothing delayed with the 2nd lockdown which, which undoubtedly cost tens of thousands of life and they won't accept responsibility. but i think they have to and that's why i think they don't really want to have an independent head of the inquiry. baron, as they don't want them investigating things like the effects of all sara, the on the just social had the fact the planning exercises were ignored. the fact that a lot of money is being wasted by challenging tunneling is to private companies. you know, almost 10000000000 on an effective protective equipment. 37000000000 on a test and trade system which hasn't been change of had any impact in reducing infection. some huge questions that need answering. and i think the governments and the prime minister will be very keen that they're not held accountable. and that's why the prime minister wants to have oversight. and their final say in the terms of reference of this inquiry and i think that is completely wrong. it needs to be fully independent. i didn't know defense. of course the government has often said it

u. k. go stuck in the same model. maybe it explains why liz chose britain's foreign secretary. use the world on a mickey map which places baltic states on the black sea. where all say supplying and offering extra support into a bowl to catalyze across the black sea. and randomly, annex is russian regions. you do recognize russia sovereignty over the rust of foreigners regions. don't you? the united kingdom will never recognise russian sovereignty over those regions. so as for seeing and hearing and speak, you know, evil when the will be seen through a western media tinted lens and geography isn't a strong point on the backdrop versus top diploma phase. it's hard to get through to western counterparts, cheryl and tm store. i am disappointed that we seem to have dialogue between a meet and a death person. they seem to be listening, but don't hair alive now. it's a political unless you analyst and all the jonathan steel. thanks for joining us there. john. good to going to program today. but i just news, numerous governments just in the last few hours. in fact, it was my citizens,

u. k. to ukraine. and the russian government has accused the british defense, secretary of massage izing, the crime and war, and getting his facts models softer. ben was reached back into history to suggest the u. k. could fight russia and when by the way and get away. i don't know if that is consistent publication is concerned ever since the fall or the soviet union when there was talk about helping russia. in fact, what, what was actually happened is consistent attempts to try and sort of clamp down on russia. push the boundaries back, incorporate many former soviet countries into nato. and there was talk quite recently of bringing the ukraine into nato as a consistent to cock chrissy in the way that russia is treated by comparison. if you think of china, china and doing all sorts of things that the west would be saying is, is unacceptable. but in fact, nothing happens in the way of sanctions fall from it. there's more business been done that has been done with a rush as a master to view and is actually trying to stop shelling that on mass republic saying they've been relentlessly attacking the region for 8 years. the city and eventu

u. k. to ukraine. the russian government has accused the british defense secretary of mythologized in the 19th century crimean war and get thing is far from models. that's up to bend, wallace reached back into the street to suggest the u. k. could fight russia and when by the way it is consistent publication as far as concern ever since the fall or the soviet union, when there was talk about helping russia. in fact, what was actually happened is consistent attempts to try and sort of clamp down or rush, push the boundaries back, incorporate many foremost countries into the nato. and the was talk quite recently of bringing the ukraine into nato. is there is a consistent hypocrisy in the way that russia is treated by comparison. if you think of china, china is doing all sorts of things that the westwood saying is, is unacceptable. but in fact nothing happens in the way of sanctions fall from it. there's more business been done that has been done with in the news, the canadian prime minister has announced the country will end the use of the emergency act since invoking it 10 days ago. authorities were given temporary powers to crack down on until v

u. k. to ukraine. and the russian government has accused the british defense, secretary of mythologized, the 19th century, try me in war and getting a fax model that's off the band was reached back into history. this is just the u. k. could fight russia. and when by the way it is consistent publication as far as concern ever since the fall of the soviet union when there was talk about helping russia. in fact, what, what was actually happened is consistent attempts to try and sort of clamp down a russia, push the boundaries back, incorporate many former soviet countries into the nato and was talk quite recently of bringing the ukraine into nato. is there is a consistent hypocrisy in the way that russia is treated by comparison. if you think of china, china and it's doing all sorts of things that the westwood saying is, is unacceptable. but in fact nothing happens in the way of sanctions fall from it. that is more business been done that has been done with russia as a matter to us. i see trying to stop shelling on bass republic saying they've been relentlessly attacking the region for 8 years. so you'd have been just spoke a couple of hours ago