u. k. perhaps they thought that to show a false would hope to hear these back. i think that's wrong because the who sees actually stands to gain from these strikes. the reason i say that is that it feeds directly into the narratives of the united states as an aggressor in the region. one thing to launch a war against is long, so that is how they will pitch it on to many people. that is how it will look. so thank you. so a miscalculation may be from the west side down and how do you see it? there was also a calculation from the who think side as elizabeth mentioned, they seemed to be profiting from this. so they knew that if they are back in the, let's see, they're going to get it back in response to that. how do you see the whole scenario? i think the, who with these all gaining from the situation on tofal elizabeth is completely right before that they were one of the warring parties in yemen. now the who was these have to be, have become an arab superstar by assuming that small melisha that is taking up the huge military might of both america and the seemingly

that the british cabinet meeting, if you will, the only with the suggestions being that perhaps some sort of u. s. u. k. attack may be imminent, the pentagon, sports person was off point blank. so what do you have to say about this? and what was interesting was, he was the public inspector as much as it pains to separate the potential for any offensive actions by the us. potentially the u. k. for example of what it's already coming together or attempted to cobble together. it's been trying to put together operational prosperity, guardian, this maritime task force to deter off other who the attacks it's been doing or having a really tough time with that, with many of its allies. even those who signed on some of them don't even want to be named publicly. those who have signed on no way the netherlands have for that. okay. well give you like 3 people. yeah. but but then no ships. so there's a bit of real tough. so in part because there is that suspicion that despite the front of the stations from the bike and white house to be administrator, and they will eventually further expound the war and cause it in

u. k. off trying to strike a rather difficult balance, perhaps an impossible one because clearly they all want rage. they are very can do to about being wide of escalation in the region. they don't want the gauze of war supply, walk into a why the regional conflagration that's going to pull in iran, that's going to put it into saudis. that's going to put in other countries around the, the, the arabian peninsula and in spite of the owns. so they want to send a message to the who is these? that's what the who things are doing in the red sea is not acceptable as we just had that from, from david cameron. but this is not an oil analysis sold. so yes, they are trying to degrades that who these minute treat capabilities, but this is a much about doing something as it is anything else. and that's perhaps why we got that resignation in the, in the words of choice by them that you know what bad doing isn't yet having the desired effects, the hurt these themselves the same. they're going to carry on doing these attacks. and they say they all going to respond to the latest round of strides sites. if the

u. k. some of us of allies intervening in that conversation, perhaps stuttering things back up could be very, very serious. and it's something that the russians in particular ahead of a un security council discussion about this. so during the week, did express very publicly, they were worried about this and as far as the political, the political potential political pushback with the british prime minister richie sooner uh, may be facing at this point. so what's, what, what, what are the calculations there for, you know, the, the u. k. system is not quite like the us system in terms of, you know, there's my constitution here. so you're hearing from as she i was mentioning, rohed kon, a of the members of congress like mike lee, a republican talking about the concerns about the constitutional requirement of the president. here in the u. k. parliament likes to have a voice, parliament called itself sovereign. but again and again through history, the last 2 or 3 decades, we have seen that has been downing street why the prime minister resides as ultimately made the decisions, particularly about t

u. k. and the region or what do you make of the fact that this is, this has perhaps not received the level of support that the us and the u. k, and the others involved in this might have hoped for that's a good question. that is a problem. the who fees are, you know, have had years to perfect their propaganda machinery and linking the entirely unrelated war and gaza to their attempts to become a regional power and indeed to be coming to recognize cover damage. that's really what that means is that regional partners of the united states are unwilling to publicly joint in to this, to the level that the united states. then the other coalition partners would want. but i'm pretty confident that they are supporting these efforts privately because of its effect on regional stability. and they don't want to see any regional power surge and basically develop the unilateral right to disrupt international shipping whenever they feel they want to. one other uh, part of that is interesting in the region of course, society or maybe of which has been involved in you haven't far, far as a company years whe

u. k, has decided that it has been pushed into a position where they deemed that a response was necessary that their hand was perhaps for us. on tuesday we saw the largest ever barrage of who 2 missiles and drones up against vessels in the red sea . and that is widely considered to have been the last straw that's according to us military officials. and that could be the main reason why we're seeing the error strikes that we have seen today. he appears to know them alone in washington dc. thank you so much for your reporting now. so i was asked and prosecutors on thursday began making the case to be un stop court. that is true. it is committing genocide and guides that they argue, that is drugs, military response to the october 7th. federal attacks have been and continue to be an attempt to destroy the policy. and in people is read, has dismissed the allegations as best list and were present as defense on friday. on the 1st day of a genocide case, against the state of each row in the hague, demonstrations on both sides, much to the u. n's talk caught in search of 2 different visions of justice. inside the quotes and

so you shipping perhaps that is because both sides of thank get of the americans and the and the us in the u. k. all worried about his relations. i don't want this blowing up into a regional, a wide conflagration setting from the war in and gaza. so there were sanctions that die retirement, so it's about that as ministry x as well babies. but at honda saying that whatever happens going forward, they all going to carry on their attacks and they can respond. so these are my spacing strides pro a challenge and not and thank you for that. it's a still head on algebra. i'm not so sure in manchester, new hampshire, which could be the scene of the last real bucks in the republican presidential nomination site. the in depth analysis of the today's headlines. how does south africa since it's accusations of genocide in this case, many genocide and holocaust scholars including his ravings con, confirm that space is a textbook genocide, frank assessments politicians need to be able to run for office without the fear of facing a jail term. informed opinions when the us census will ships into the red sea. it

u. k affiliated shipments could be destroyed by the who phase. how is that likely to impact the buyer confidence in the targeted suppliers where they look for alternatives perhaps? i think, yeah, think you went right rachel, it's significant because if, let's say i, you know, i'm a country that once he wants to buy from one of the big oil and gas u. s. u k, but he met, you know, the british petroleum is of the, well, the, the heck songs of 12 then you know, you're going to look at other places because at the moment you've got plenty of them as long as you have an ally yourself totally with with us foreign policy, you go to other options of, of, of you can buy, for example, from the chinese, a lot of kind of countries can do the chinese chinese shits very in very few places . the, well, the sanction, or you can even buy from russia situation. so yeah, i think a think it's, it's just good news for so multi is part of darcy. very bad. the very bad news for, for the. so the rules bags to the the ocean floor administer saturday or loud. rob has held a series of meetings with the district is uranian, ends up, and he's gone to pods and thank you, a representative to t

u. k affiliated shipments could be destroyed by the who phase. how is that likely to impact the buyer confidence in the targeted suppliers where they look for alternatives? perhaps? i think, yeah, think you went right rachel, it's significant because it's that say on the, you know, on the country, the ones who wants to buy from one of the big oil and gas u. s. u k, but he met, you know, the british petroleum is of the well the, the excellence of 12 then you know, you're going to look at other places because at the moment you've got plenty of as long as you have an allied yourself, totally with, with us foreign policy, you go to other options of, of, of you can buy, for example, from the chinese. a lot of countries can do the chinese chinese shits very in very few places in the world. a sanction. or you can even buy from russia as soon as you wish. so yeah, i think it, i think it's, it's just good news or for multi is part of darcy. very bad. the very bad useful. so the so the rules bikes do the press? well, what other economic consequences do you expect to see from this fragile and security situation in the long term? you know, i think in the long term we can ju

u. k. will face challenges in trying to secure the red sea. a blessing both of the you runs and humans solve law movement. they realize that a war could perhaps on the folds in the near future, we're talking about a regional more because i think it's very clear with the shipping of pieces in the middle east, especially with the red sea, the formation of the west leg naval coalition. they have the intention to invade, given, or at the very least, to conduct a wide scale military campaign against humans. a sallow law you have any are viewed . i think the reason for that is because the us and the u. k. they need to secure the right to secure bathroom and they need bab and blended to be in their possession to be in their you know, under their control so that they can allow their western hedge a monic imperial structure to continue to progress and expand throughout the middle east, the only thing that's preventing this world domination from continuing is humans outside a law movement because they have taken control of human. human is no longer under the control and the shackles of the west because they have control of government. they have the con

u. k and, and the us have, have underestimated this and, and, and, and there is a risk perhaps of, of them sleep walking into a larger conflict not just in with, with the who it is in yemen, but elsewhere in the region. and i think the banners that they underestimated the gravity of the situation was actually back in october when they focused suddenly on the implications, but as well officers both from attacks but fails to appreciate and understand just how this could escalate out of control. the diplomacy would no longer be possible to contain it. i'd like to speak that when you get to minute traction, it's a signal of failure. you have failed to use your diplomatic and other tools to prevent this. it should be the last option. and then taking minute traction. it is a song that you run out of i did is you run out a way to do things. it's a very high risk moves. now, i would say this by that on this occasion. and of course the us and u. k. been involved to many attacks in the middle east and elsewhere together combined. they all not, don't her. i think it is credible to say that they don't

u. k may face some challenges and try to secure the red sea a blessing. both the e runs and humans, a sallow law movement. they realize that a war could perhaps, or the folds in the near future. we're talking about a regional more because i think it's very clear with the shipping of pieces in the middle east, especially with the red sea, the formation of a us led naval coalition. they had the intention to invade, given, or at the very least, to conduct a wide scale military campaign against humans. a sallow law. you have any r b. i think the reason for that is because the us and the u. k. they need to secure the red sea big to secure bathroom and they need bab and meant it to be in their possession to be in there, you know, under their control so that they can allow their western hedge a monic imperial structure to continue to progress and expand as well, the middle east. the only thing that's preventing this world domination from continuing is humans outside of la moving because they have taken control of human human is no longer under the control and the shackles of the west because they have control of government. they have the control of

u. k may face some challenges in trying to secure the red sea. well, i think both the you run and humans solve law movement. they realize that a war could perhaps on the folds in the near future, we're talking about a regional more because i think it's very clear with the shifting of pieces in the middle east, especially with the red sea. the formation of a us led naval coalition. they have the intention to invade goodman or at the very least, to conduct a wide scale military campaign against humans. a sallow law. you have any r v. and i think the reason for that is be.

u, a k. and then we've also got it strengthening its foothold in africa as well with if you, if you had an egypt being added on argentina was supposed to, why didn't we can perhaps talk about that in a 2nd. but you can see the intention that was to also strengthen his position in south america. so that's one of the key tactics here. and does that mean that's a big blow that argentina is now? not joining? it's a pretty curious case, isn't it? it's a really strange one and they only pulled out of the plan to join 10 days before they were supposed to on december. the 22nd, which and jerry for let's go to adams. his is last minute relevant insights. i wouldn't necessarily have come as a surprise to the existing members of breaks because if you've been following the campaign of how the emulate the new president, argentina, you'd know that his eyes and not looking towards badging demo, or looking towards brussels and securely towards washington. he has a very different foreign policy to that of his previous assa. and so this is less of a surprise that the interesting thing is though, if have a, a delay and origin tina all looking towards washington, are they going to