u. s. exports of l. n. g are priced up to 4 times higher than the domestic market. energy experts point out the u. k. u s. deal will not solve the crisis. is a strategy that is at best short sighted and at west will only further enrich the oil and gas industry at the expense of everyone else. the u. k. dependence on russian energy exports has been comparatively low. last year just 4 percent of gas was imported. the major portion of the u. k. supply coming from norway, international petroleum economist john foster question whether the new deal will be able to lower prices. what they okay. united states say is that in this announcement is that they will work together to what they say to increase energy security and drive down prices. in my view, that's meaningless. it's a hollow promise. they, us, administration, the people of washington do not regulate the prices for over to the other commercial terms, which the energy exports are made by private companies in the united states. i cannot see how this other deal will help you. ok, consumers for start with energy bills when i see about they talk about the n g u an

u. k. how's agree to deal with the u. s. to double liquefied natural gas exports to burson with the nations prime minister, setting the goal of lowering prices. together the u. k. and us will insure the global price of energy and the security of all national supply can never again be manipulated by the whims of a failing regime. the partnership will bring down prices for british consumers and help in europe's dependence on russian energy wants and full. this by the 10th report, so the u. k and europe will be facing major challenges to stay warm. the international energy agency said that europe is only safe this year, and last summer, rush and gas helped replenish reserves. meanwhile, us exports of l. n. g, a priced up to 4 times higher than the domestic market. energy expos points out the u. k. u. s. deal, it will not solve the crisis. it is a strategy that is at best short sighted and at worst will only further enrich the oil and gas industry at the expense of everyone else. the u. k. if dependance on russian energy exposure has been comparatively low. last year, just 4 percent of gas was imported. the major portion of the u. k. supply coming from norway,

deal. it appears that the u. s. and the u. k. in particular had tried to prevent these from breaking out. and so it makes me very skeptical about how serious, either biting or the lines you're at this point about truly negotiating the others new to these new di and now the supplies that he's supposed to contribute to these weapons means piece. but what are these 2 people talking about? really? yeah, i don't think generally speaking, weapons contribute to peace. i do think this is an escalation. although at the same time, i think it's also a matter of putting money in the coffers of the defense industry. you know, i think that the u. s. is happy to give that money, whether the patriot missiles are used or not. as you noted, it would take a lot of training to get you ukrainian troops up to speed even use them. but again, i think the u. s. is just happy to have another reason to send the defense industry money. but at the same time, this certainly take most to russia that the role of the u. s. and deepening in ukraine that therefore it really just reaffirms russians believes that they're not

u. s. u k. canada, japan and australia have also agreed to that cap. it's aimed at starving. the kremlin of cash to funded invasion of ukraine while avoiding a surge and energy prices. the deal will come into effect along with an embargo on russian crude oil, which prevents shipments by tanka to the block that you hoped to have that cap in place by monday, during a hot has more from london, has been the subject of really quite fraught negotiations between you remember states for months now initially over the sort of market economics of an oil cap at all. and then over the price at which any oil cap might be set, poland has joined estonia. they were the 2 main holdouts among the member states in agreeing to an e. u commission proposal made on thursday to set an oil cap at $60.00 a barrel. with that verification mechanism for the price to be revisited every 2 months to ensure that it remains at least 5 percent in theory, at least 5 percent below, whatever the market value of russian is deemed to be. now this isn't going to affect pretty much in any way e u countries ability to buy russian oil at any price. because from monday, december, the 5th a band comes into play only you