u. n. system. the fact is the u. k and sweden accepted to be parties. so a 16 month process, 16 months of litigation before the working group with arbitrary detention i made submission. the u. k responded in the process to those submission. sweden responded to those submissions, formerly as a pa, key to the proceedings, the they last u. k. los sweden, last it last at the highest level, the the by the what i reject the finding of this working group. it's a group made up of lay people, not lawyers, and they are. their conclusion is flawed in law julian, the sounds of fugitive from justice. he's hiding from justice in the dorian embassy . he can come out onto the pavement anytime can choose, because he's not being detained by frankly, a ridiculous finding by the working group. and we rejected majors. we're talking to the former un repertoire, an arbitrary detention fund in a new country likes to to get the routing for arbitrated attention to be attention body. you don't like this, but if you don't abide by it, you fall into the category of countries. we do