u. s. government, that bank roles regime change operations abroad actually laid out and explicit strategy in 2009 to recognize marginalized and de socialize the youth. and that very same year, usa id, another arm of the u. s. government, which is an intelligence front in many cases, began approaching to anti government hip hop wrappers in cuba. promoting them and even creating social media platforms to promote their anti government lyrics. and this is a program that has continued today and culminated with the rise of the senate seizure movement and this anthem pottery evita, which has become the slogan of these anti government anti communist cuban protests . on friday, the us government agency close its $2000000.00 funding program to new applicants. the goal of the project was to bring about social change in cuba and support. young people, women, l g, b, t groups, office and individuals of afro cuban said, while the us finance his council programs in cuba, the remains under severe economic sanctions. cuba has been on the us embargo for more than half a century since 1962. in fact, some es

u. s. government. that bank role is regime change operations abroad actually laid out in explicit strategy in 2009 to weaponized marginalized and d socialized youth. and that very same year, usa id, another arm of the u. s. government, which is an intelligence front in many cases began approaching anti government hip hop wrappers in cuba. promoting them and even creating social media platforms to promote their anti government lyrics. and this is a program that has continued today and culminated with the rise of the senate seizure movement. and this anthem part 3 e veto, which has become the slogan of these anti government anti communist cuban protests . and its program aimed at providing help to cuba, usa, it says that it will be supporting young people, women, l, g, p, t, groups, artists, tons, individuals of afro cuban descent. it also says culture projects will be funded to bring about social changes on the island and for all of they sit is allocated $2000000.00 us dollars. while the u. s. finance is cultural programs on cuba. the other remains under severe economic sanctions has been under us embargo for mo

u. s. actually face legal challenges here in the philippines. but what was mentioned earlier is that it does not change the original document of the visiting force agreement. and more importantly, the visiting force agreement holler, will focus on the modernization of the philippine military, around $300.00 bilateral exercises starting next month. we're talking about the boost of counterterrorism operations in the southern philippines in the mean the in the menda now region and more importantly, maritime enhanced maritime cooperation in the south china sea, where it's shina looms large over the philippines. or were there is or is controlled by the philippines with its expensive build up of islands and reeds that are also controlled not just by the philippines but by other claimant countries. so this is a development, possibly a full restoration of scale down the activities. and basically a kind of counter balance of this growing influence of china over the administration. jimmy lynn and i'm going to in manila. thank you. another 27 co with 19 in

u. s. actually exploiting and trying to create racial divisions in cuban society. in fact, doing what many liberals and democrats in the united states accused russia of doing with no evidence with black lives matter. that's actually the operational program in cuba right now. in order to paint this state that has been racially progressive, which has given asylum to black american dissidence, which fought apartheid south africa to paint it as racially regressive, and even structurally races. fascinating investigation. and indeed, in a fascinating conversation to max blumenthal editor in chief of the grades on, thank you very much. i appreciate it. thanks a lot. can forces have managed to arrest back control of a key northern district from the taliban? there, treating militants left behind a trail of deliberate destruction. locals described to us some other damage inflicted on their homes and neighborhoods. my and they planted mines here and over there, the attached large amounts of explosive and blew up all the buildings around here. and i'm moving into it as you can

u. s. actually saying yes, this was genocide or guess this was cultural genocide? it's a possibility mary, you thought oh, i don't think so. i don't think you know, to me is very revealing that this question you gave, how can we fix this? that's always what. forgive me. i'm just going to say it, that's all white america wants to know. this is uncomfortable, uncomfortable truth. we don't want to deal with this. we want to get better. we want to move on. you know, it's like how do we fix this? how long have you got? you know, this is something we've been living with for generations. i think just being educating yourself a little bit in an area that is uncomfortable. you know, that is a start and integrating that into our educational system. we're primarily the history that need to tell our students about native people or their fairytales, you know, they really, really, very little to, to actual to reality. so, you know, i don't really know if they will apologize and i don't really know how terribly meaningful that is. at least to me personally, i just would like to b

u. s. actually went into afghanistan after 911. the objective via call was to eliminate the taliban, who had been harboring been logged and given that they haven't done that, do you regard? this is a failed mission. well, it looks like it's not a positive outcome. i don't know if it says failure. the actual goal was to get al qaeda because, you know, at different points, especially over the last 10 years, there's been negotiations with the taliban to see if they will. ready move away from harboring groups like al qaeda isis. so the actual mission was to get been ludden. and in that sense, yes, it succeeded. it was also to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al qaeda. and in that sense, i think it succeeded, but it certainly did not succeed in helping the afghan people and the afghan government stand on its own. and i think we're going to see the devastating. ready consequences of that in the next few weeks. what do you make of the timing if this patrol is this is by the says, a strategic call to avoid getting involved in nation building

u. s. if conditions actually deteriorate the u. s. did say that, hey, we can pull all of these chinese companies off the stock of the stock exchanges and that would be extremely detrimental in the long run. for all these chinese companies does more of a defensive play for now, rather than an outright. vito, certainly those tension between the 2 countries do still remain. now then china's market regulator on saturday said it would block 10 to plan to merge the country top to video games streaming sites on antitrust grounds. what happened there? yeah, you know, we talk about this quite a bit. it seems like which is this idea of anti trust coming out of china. the chinese regulators are being very serious about that. they have a mandate to say, make sure that you don't have companies that are too big and therefore is bad for consumers. in this case, the 2 companies that 10 percent would want to, to merge with essentially collectively they would control 80 percent of the entire gaming streaming market in china. and so the regulator said,

u. s. government in afghanistan. and there are very few things that are actually within the control of the u. s. government there for 2 decades, we've had quite lofty goals, enough honest on. and i think that led to the, the, the inability to achieve those goals lead to the withdrawal. just the decision that the by an administration made. but what is important now is not to disengage from afghanistan and to, to re focus on things that are achievable and resolving the i v issue is the 1st step william britons, a ministry of defense, has previously acknowledged that they have an obligation to protect afghans who had worked with the british government where, where does that efforts stand right now? well, they've finally come to the conclusion that they do. we do have a moral obligation. and since, from april this year, april 2021, the british government is taking the decision to allow any afghans who work directly for the british government or agencies to apply for asylum status in the u. k. from afghanistan. and there may be up to 3000 afghans who would qualify. so i think after a long debate an

u. s. may have lost some negotiating power because of that with military withdrawal from afghanistan. but just talk us through the role that the u. s. is actually playing in these talks. while you're right, there has been speculation that perhaps the u. s. is losing it, seated the table as the afghan civilian government and the tall about tried to work out some sort of peace deal. but tell, let's not forget the taller bond 1st dealt with the americans before actually sitting down with this afghan civilian leadership. and that is where, of course, among other things, the idea of a prisoner swap or prisoner release was agreed to. now the us does still have a very central role in these talks. it is acting as an interlocutor in the talks and bouncers all my little side has been going back and forth working with both sides to try to help them reach some sort of eventual piece deal. he was also in some of the neighboring countries of afghan and stand earlier this week, working with them on ways to try to support the eventual afghan government was ceiling. a peace deal is reached between both parties. the u. s. also does have the, it's ongoing economi

u. s. has actually been involved in recent strikes now, but told you the u. s. carried out as strikes and i've got a song, a few months ago would be no surprise, but they haven't done it for some considerable time. and it is significant because of the 1st strike, since the vast majority of us troops pulled out of this country. in fact, the strikes weren't called in from i'm going to stop. they were called in by the us central command. we understand they hit targets in a number of provinces including kandahar province. another bit of news for you pizza, the african govern government heralding the fact they've taken back one district in herat province in the west of afghanistan. they're saying that's an important sign of that fight back. but it is worth telling you that is one district out of we believe, $213212.00 that the taliban control out of a total of $419.00 districts across the process of chemist on james. thank you very much. james bayes are diplomatic, added to the in column one person's been shot dead, 2 others were injured during process against wate

u. s. government actually, behind the riots and the white house will use any means available to turn cuba upside down. that's what i call on twitter. and i also call them the u. s. government to recognize or deny that political operators actively use tags collectives or groups of robots. trolls who use a coordinated with automated means to flood the networks, etc, etc. in this operation against cuba roles. if you go on twitter, you'll find the hash tag as so as cuba in the trends, and some of the most senior you as politicians among go sending out the signal saying how much they are worried. so genuinely worried be so for the cuban regime to step down and lead democracy flourish in cuba. i hope and pray for a free tube for morality is no suffering under is unbearable communist rule. viva cuba libra s o s. cuba. so as cuba might as well turn into cuban lives, matter, please don't blame me for trying to sound sarcastic when talking about serious hardships of an entire nation. but just think of this, it's america that's been squeezing you by the clutches of its economic blockade for 6 decade

u. s. are actually physically evacuating people. they've given visas to then that doing more than, than they do more than other countries. i think, i think the, the, the british application process shouldn't be betty lend say for those who have work directly for the british government, because we know who they are. the embassy will know who they are and it shouldn't be too, too, too cumbersome process. we're talking a maximum of i think about 3000 people here that shouldn't take too long. so i don't think there be any, any prospect of taking them to 3rd countries. i would hope that the african government and the, the african forces. they're not going to collapse within a few weeks. i don't expect that to happen. i don't expect us fears to happen, but it does need. they do need to get on with it. i don't think the end a july, you know, a few weeks is the deadline. i don't see the taliban walking into a provincial capitals any time soon, even though they've taken a lot of a lot of districts. so i fear that that is not the case that th

u. s. to actually stay competitive in these tax bases in a way, yes, because as ben does pointed out, asia is basically driving all the growth in technology right now. and especially e commerce, e commerce is growing faster in asia than it is in the u. s. and in europe. so right now with this trade proposal, the u. s. is trying to win basically the new battle grounds, the new battlegrounds of tech. and by doing this, by saying that, hey, you have to choose either us or china, you're splintering this entire digital landscape. so that means i, south, east asian nations will be forced to, to the side. if they do choose to side with us, that means china will withdraw all of their technology out of it. and not only will they set these countries back, but now this gives the us ample room to bring in google to bring facebook to bring all their companies in. so not only is the us trying to push china out, the us trying to spread their own influence by using this proposal as a leaping board to kind of spread their influence and favor their own tech companies. and kristi did this, china in its own r

u. s. exchange of in 3 years, unless the 2 government can actually region information sharing agreement. and i think that's the key that would allow the u. s. regulator to actually inspect these listed chinese companies. financial records when fraud is defected. so i think the fees the appears to be concerned that these big tech companies, they hold very sensitive user information that could pose a national security risk if it falls into the wrong hands, including perhaps the us intelligence agencies. so in terms of db, doubtfully has the most detail travel information on individuals among large inner urge and they appear to have the ability to conduct big data analysis on the behaviors and habits. a very important hiring people, everybody uses d d. so the c a c is taking a closer look at how it manages consumer data. in case there is an escalation in terms of information wars. yeah, and we're definitely seeing that cracked on coming from both sides. now dean, call it. we know that being path a new data security law to govern how companies collect, store, and use data. they pass that jus

well, i think what we're saying is we actually seen a divider g. u. s. president have actually agreed to the proposal that we lift the patience on the batting the rest of the g 7 arrive sitting on the fence or in the case as far as johnson. and i'm awfully opposed to this proposal, and we can only put that down to narrow back the nationalism and government missing the profit interest, the big pharmacy corporations ahead of global interest in terms of guessing, i guess, in this pandemic, under control. and we really need to see the government, the german government stock blocking these proposals that would run pop supplies on the right side of history. now if we've done this a year ago, we would be in a different position. now we would have so many more doses being made developing countries. we have a short supply. * for themselves, yes, 12 months after all those commitments that the best thing would be a global public good. and they're still standing in the way of boxing in developing countries. i mean, i've seen k street in washington dc and the massiv

companies like ali baba who actually were profitable, but still chose to list on the us exchange anyway, that was also due to the differences between the chinese and the u. s. exchanges in the u. s. offers voting powers that are beyond their share. so founders and management team, they can actually still keep control of the company even with less than majority shares. and that is just simply not possible in china. so that was very important for ali baba to actually maintain control of the company. and then just to put it very simply, the listing in the u. s. allows a company to be deemed international. it is better to then attract international source, the capital from the us, from europe, than to list in china, where you're getting only capital from a very small domestic and local pool. and christy, i want to follow up on that because there are a number of chinese tech firms that want to move ahead with i p o in new york. but the real question here is we're basing allow those companies to move forward. i think they will continue to allow them on a very small scale to list in new york, but it will just make it very difficult for these companies. so rather

u. s. now decides actually retaliate against russia, what exactly can it do? what does a retaliation look like? how does it play out and can russia then just escalate all of this and can it get worse? yes, to that last question. and that's the trouble with retaliation. but obviously, president biden has a diplomatic options. he even has military options as it's been over 10 years that the military has been kind of granted the ability to respond with kinetic attack against cyber attack, which they probably would in certain limited cases. in this case, it sounds like president biden is threatening of cyber attack. that would be in kind and proportional the, you know, us government has tremendous cyber capabilities. and one of the dangers of using those overcame cyber capabilities is they might be using some zeroed a vulnerabilities that they've researched or developed themselves. and as soon as they use them, the victim has copies of it and can reverse engineer and turn it around and use it as a weapon against their own victims. so it's very dangerous to use som

actually maintain control of the company. and then just to put it very simply, the listing in the u. s. allows a company to be deemed international. it is better to then attract international source of capital from the u. s. from europe than to list in china where you're getting only capital from a very small domestic and local pool. and christy, i want to follow up on that because there are a number of chinese tech firms that want to move ahead with ip in new york. but the real question here is we're basing allow those companies to move forward. i think they will continue to allow them on a very small scale to list in new york, but it will just make it very difficult for these companies. so rather than barring all companies from listing, they're simply enacting the c a c as a, as a kind of a watchdog organization, kind of like a gatekeeper to try to limit the flow, as they said, because the cybersecurity, because the data sharing was what been mentioned before, if you have users over 1000000, you have to go through this very lengthy investigational process that is a direct copy from t

u. s. tried a relationship right now. i think there are plenty of issues that the u. s. in china can actually work on human rights. not one of these. hong kong is also like out. it's not something that the 2 countries can come to an agreement on, but some issues they could agree on are in the area of technology or trade and so on. so that's where they should start to see what we can agree on. because there's a lot of work to be done in those fears. right. exactly, but there is what i know. let me go diner in beijing here. but there is what i would like to talk about what you can't talk about. ok, let's be be very clear about compromising a country sovereignty, hong kong, irrespective of how you feel, what hong kong, that's part of china, that's their affair. and the, the process of the united states and china exchanging diplomatic embassies is that taiwan is part of china. it's very clear, a very simple look at the documents, ok. it was explicit and implicit here where you wouldn't know that from the mainstream media whatsoever. so let's go to peter. when you take a look at that, i mean, i think you're, you're abs

well, and i understand that you actually think that the u. s. backed off that other countries like china, turkey, russia, per se, the middle east, that they would actually reduce their numbers as well. the united states could radically reduce military spending and military weapons build up around the world simply by ceasing to sell weapons. is the overwhelmingly the number one weapons dealer and the state department serves to pressure other countries to buy these weapons. what passes for enemies, the countries that the united states refuses to cooperate with because they need these, the enemies for propaganda purposes. the russians, china, iran, and so forth, are not actually any wrecked, and you would see them scaled back, their militarism. so i'm all like russia already are in some ways scaling back their militarism if the united states would as well. and you know, this was something that people hoped for in moving from the trump administration to a new u. s. government and thus far were getting just the opposite. more of the same great conve

u. s. s. to get off the fence and actually make the waiver happen. either the in this deal at pfizer and beyond tech have signed to fill and finish in south africa. send the product out africa to be filled up. they're not going to start doing producing until the end of next year with distribution. early in 2023 seems a very long way off considering as we know how quickly variance seem to appear, how do we get things moving more quickly? why agree with you about it? because i think when you look at it from a scientific point of view, from just common sense, actually because you will not want to take this risk actually leaving huge numbers of population without the vaccine because it's could, it's a really terrible thing. get terrible. this isn't, it says it might have and you are in some buster, you will be coming back and start another pandemic. and i think i have to say the word actually i could, i resisted but i have to say stupid. it's really stupid to do that. i think the other thing just coming back to the position between the europeans and the

but this was the 1st time we've seen during the locked down where the actual u. s. government issued treasury bonds, trillions of them and sent them out. the result has been, according to the fed, reserved data that they released every quarter about household wealth. you see the parabolic increase and wealth from the top one percent. now the bottom 50 percent, their wealth increased by $10000.00, household wealth from $4000.00 before it. but the likes of say jeff bezos, his wealth, increased by 88000000000 last year. also in mosque, similar amount of money and wealth increase. so you know, the deficits don't matter. they say paul, pregnant says debt is just we money we owe to ourselves. but speaking of deceit, dis equal librium and instability. it seems like this sort of explosion of wealth. 8 gap, it seems like that money that they say doesn't exist. it all finals always to the elite 1st. and then it never trickles down, especially in economy like the u. s, which is just purely financial life. there's no manufacturing, there's no wealth creation. there are no real