u. s. appeals court did find the program this snowden had exposed, was unlawful. why do you think this to pursue him for this then? well, they hate edward snowden because he did what no one else had the courage to do. it fully expected to meet his death by doing this. he did it anyway. and the supreme outrage is that he got free. okay. now, how did he get free? he was in hong kong. there was a worldwide look out from a dragnet. they're going to get a, but they didn't said he got on a plane and got to moscow. how did that happen? i'll tell you how it happened. julian assigned hope that to happen. he had people who are non con, they worked out a deal. they got him on that plane. why did they have children? you know, such, partly because he got it snowden out and safe. and now it has a family and a little boy, and i applied it beds, watching your friend re applied what you did. congratulations on your citizenship. he knows maybe he's watching raymond, i think you've given the fact that, you know, has versus citizenship. it's even more likely that he will be getting b

u. s. circuit court of appeals in san francisco. defense lawyer. mendoza is president biden, sixth appointee to the nation's largest federal appeals court. all six have been either people of color women or both. time is now for 44. president biden is calling for a cancer moonshot to deal with the continuing battle to cure cancer. the president john f. kennedy's daughter, caroline was there yesterday for the 60th anniversary of her father's famous moonshot speech about going to the moon and president biden's cancer moonshot goal is to cut the death rate in cancer in half over the next 25 years, dividing the ministrations, also creating a new agency. their job is to pave the way for new diagnostic tools as well as treatments. imagine during an al that could detect cancer early. for the chance of secure best imagine. getting a simple shot instead of a grueling chemo again in the pill from a local pharmacy instead of invasive treatments. and long hospital stays. now that issue is very personal for east bay congressman mark to sonia, who

u. s. bank war crimes tribunal has rejected an appeal by the last surviving can be laid on the court in cambodia has upheld the genocide conviction and life sentence handed to 91 year old q. sam fan in 2018. he was head of state during the rule of the committee, when 2000000 people were killed. foreign fluid has been following the story from quite a long pull. this is the 2nd, but it's also the final case to be heard by the us back tribunal. and to some point, he was initially charged with 3 others, but one was found unfit to stand trial and one died before hit the hearing could commence. and he was convicted in 2018 together with noon chain was known as brother. number 2 in the commune, rouge regime, and he, this is, he's appealing that conviction and then she died before the appeal could be heard. on thursday, the appeals chamber of the community tribunal dismissed nearly all the all the arguments put forth by to some pon, prostitute to say he was one of the most one of those was most responsible for the crimes during that period. even though que some point had sought to portray himse

appeal filed by the doj on friday, asking that the fbi wreaking access to those classified documents, so that they can resume investigating potential crimes. nancy gertner served as a u. s. district courtrently, a senior lecturer at harvard law school, and she joins me now. nancy, i don't envy judge dearie here because it's very unclear what he is supposed to do. so, it seems a little unclear to him, too, because the first thing he's asked is for the trump people to say what trump may have declassified or says he declassified, and the trump lawyers respond by saying, you can't make a say that, that we will force the plaintiff to fully and specifically disclose a defense to the merits of any subsequent indictment. what is he supposed to do here? >> i feel like saying beats me, but i'll be better than that. it sounds like he wanted trump 's lawyers to do what they should've been doing for two years, which is, identify specific documents that don't fit under the presidential records act, that don't fit within classified documents regime, and are documents as to which he has a proprietary interest. bear in mind, it's still extraordinary. we're focused on this case, but in fact, trump had t

u. s. supreme court already ruled against donald trump in a different case that he had very limited if it any executive privilege. so there's, it seems likely the justice department is going to try and appeal this. we reached out to them. they have it. in fact said, i responded to us, it's a federal holiday here. but there is concern about the precedent, the sets. now this could have been a bigger deal if trump's legal team had, in fact taken this step immediately after those records were sealed. they didn't. so the justice department has already come out and said, we know what all the documents are. we've already read them to basically the judges saying you could know that, but you can investigate where they came from, how they got there. who else could have seen them if it involves the documents themselves. so it's a minor setback for the justice department, but he'll do nothing to stop this investigation. will continue to watch with keen interest pettigrew, heineman, forest and all washington dc bureau. thanks buddy. this well still had hail. now there is news out of thousands of people living out in the open and don't run job, didn't i don't and i'm come out of hide. and roger and food