her name believes nato expansion is hugely beneficial to the u. s. b u. s. is a military, empire, and partner from the needs of an empire is to expand and take resources that it may not have on its own. we look at the middle east, how the u. s. invaded iraq, how and when, after afghanistan. and there was no legitimate reason for either those wars, but there were plenty of natural resources that the u. s. one and part of an empire is to take the resources that it can, i think is really a bottom line reason for that. so the u. s. is in, was in libya, took over that, destroyed the country. it's throughout africa and there are believe 20 more than 20 us basis in africa right now for nato. it's clearly an attempt to re colonial ised africa and other parts of the world. so really is an economic reason . there is no more reason. there's no humanitarian reason for any of this. it is pure economics, the deputy chairman of russia's security council, dmitri mid via d of has claimed g 7 countries would. rod, the quotes continue a proxy war with russia instead of dealing