u. s. because it needs to both of congressmen in the us and also by the level of ambition they countries like i and on what the sex m to will. but i love because i will have an implication on the good of damage. so it's nothing like a global, purely multilateral process, is nothing like that a deal that was supposed to be there to, to provide the defensiveness for developing countries. he said that he said just a concession to summer that have been sent to some bigger con amusement. but what is acceptable for the business big business and those economies must suffer our poorer countries eventually going to be pressured into joining the system? yes, i mean, like we've seen already so far, i read the question l y, developing some developing countries. and the reason is, so sometimes this is beyond technical, they're largely each issue. so in most countries in africa, why you're finding the disconnect between the political and technical side of things. so miss your final me may recommend that a deal i

u. s. because of the wind speed, my sister was shot in the handle of the army and the police say that everything's okay now that the here you worried about the future for c t typical but up. ok. yes. because the here just for a year, what will happen after that and look, if you're not going to take us with them, what will happen to us and our families also this is a home, this is our community. where are we going to go? where can we go without children? won't be a future for them. we're just going from house to house and city days. the army checkpoint and the state police station did the shut up village school a trying to provide reassurance. they gave us a ride around town. a lot of people have now returned to last me to the village to has quite subdued add to it. there's no law of causal people in the street apart from the soldiers and the police who with now one man who hasn't showed the state new governor, or any one from his cabinet. even though last i meet this is just an hour from the capita

u. s. because there's a lot of fun for being made by death. it's returned to the old, the pirates agreement after the wilderness years of the trump regime. but unfortunately, joe biden is not bringing anything that even remotely resembles the united states its fair share of climate auction. the united states is the largest, the stark polluter. and earlier in the report was mentioned that production gap report in you can see the united states is commitment to climate change amounts to increasing its production of fossil fuel in the next decade. so it's a bit rich for joe biden to come to glasgow and hector other countries in particular, developing countries to increase their ambition and, and be carbonized on the similar time scale to the united states. when the united states has been the biggest polluter for so long in this process in this space, in particular, also really the biggest, the believe the biggest lie garden drive on ambition has been many cops in the past where the cars essentially been told by other countries get out of the way,

u. s. because of a result of the current of ass, ah, hedge allergies were marked at the washington national cathedral as you can hear their bites bell being rung 700 times. more people are reported to have died from the disease in the us than any other country that tens of millions of americans are still refusing to be vaccinated. while it is now time for the weather, and he is jeff. the southwest monsoon beginning to retreat, hello, have few weeks behind schedule, but here's what it's looking like. the rains not as active as they have been for that reason, but still some heavy falls can be found maharaj straw rate in to go up, but all red and amber weather alerts have been dropped over to the south china sea . we've got a weather maker swirling around its whipping rain around all sides here. so north of mandela that a $130.00 millimeters of rain and then for northern in central parts of vietnam, about $200.00 millimeters. and then this also happened on high nan province in china. water rescues her

u. s. e. a partnership no longer really works because interest are changing our and becoming more and more divergent. so the u. s. is focusing more on china and asia, and thus it's shifting both its resources and it said already, accordingly, i was very obviously obvious with sabrina dealer with australia, by the way. so when the us so years will give less to europe, but ask for more in terms of asking you to, for example, come from china. and this is where i'm out of the tensions are these like a common interest and when you're peanuts the way, i think they do have a dilemma one hand, they seek to maintain the relevant to the u. s. by, for example, accepting but nato should also be an anti chinese lives. however, no matter what they do with this will be very superficial in temporary because china's too far waiting in the segment. nothing else. a threat to the european union to the same extent pregnancy dominance in the asia pacific. so it's also the problem for the used by joining this u. s. chris, a crusade against both the russia and the chinese. the u. s. isolated south because it becomes less a

all worthless reason being is because the u. s. has actually reserve the rights over any of those decisions that they've made on his house, of course. and you have to look at the court proceedings because yesterday many a calculated unit started looking very bad in his mental health. clearly under this stress throughout yesterday proceedings, and we only have to his tele morris, the long suffering partner of judith sergeant said she was taken up by jeff, how he is and any explanation would be active. it can't amount to his killing. now, today, much of the session will also be used to present the new mamma revelations, with all the u. s. halogen officers reveal that the cia had even planned as high walled units. not as in london, ecuador, and embassy to kidnap him, or even assassinate him. plus they will try and push that argument back in january . that one of the witnesses will, the united states now know can be working at the time as an f. b. i, informant. not only broke cover, but actually admitted that he was lying during the cou

u. s. is involved in this as well, the u. s. government, because they're not too sure they're not too fond of the lebanese government makes it up. and so they've been turning up the sanctions turning off the dollar flow. i mean, it's really credible how when the u. s. one to pressure a country, they just turn off the flow of dollars and it can really messed things up there. so that is definitely an ingredient there too, and that's why i so important because it bypasses all this bad stuff and whatnot. so we'll see what happens. you know, we, you and i and stacy spend some time there. of course, the 15 on those are mutual friend who wrote, you know, the bible on the big standards from there to so this is help us for a not insignificant community is big pointers there and that is, that is a genuine raffle. now let's talk about a place in the north atlantic. it rains there alive, and they've got a central bank. the 1st central bank chartered in 1694. i believe the bank of england. yes. the bank of england policy maker over there is one that big coin co

u. s. has a capital a system they'll, they'll never restrict a big claim because that's a u. s. believes and freedom, unlike china. well, that's a little bit, i would say like sliding night because i'm not entirely sure that that's true. but it also apparently is the case based on capital flows that the rest of the most crypto friendly, one of the most crypto mining friendly places in the world right now. well, and there still are a lot of questions about what the us government is going to do. we're rather going to try to do when it comes to these regulations. now jeffrey, staying with you, we've heard from the bank of england deputy governor, fight for financial state. plenty. he warned that crypto currencies cause spark a global financial crisis unless tough regulations are introduced. why do you think he's making that claim? so way viewers need to recognize is that the driving up political, a power behind regulations right now is the government's all over the world. and i don't care if it's a china war or the u. k. or the west, or any government in latin america, exceptions

u. s. chris, a crusade against both the russia and the chinese, the u. s. isolated south because it becomes less able to diversify pies and thus excessively reliance on the us. so i and i only use the bus and prioritize your so the solution is simply for the you, in my opinion, at least a diversified ice. so develop an independent foreign policy towards the extent is possible, as well as both the russians and the chinese and by all means keep the trans atlantic partnership alone, but also find a place in his chin on you greater your ation partnership with these marci ration hours he owned him and it, it seems to me when i, when i look at this here in kind of an echo with glen just said to us here is that in the u. s. takes it as a axiomatic that they did, the europe will go along to pursue or push forward a washington's foreign policy interests. you know, you take care of the russians for us and we'll take care of the chinese, or we want you to be anti chinese who. i mean it's, it's very derogatory and in the way i look at it, i mean, why should the, the, an economy that's larger

u. s. o, because i'm afraid of been jailed. well, you should always be ready to prison and to have a problem. so you could face 5 years in prison. and i, we know people who went to jail yawning, shortly after, because of this law and this law, this is part of sanctions against russia and nicholas, sometimes they invited to the congress and you cannot get to the congress. and so without this, he cannot go anywhere. you're on the ground there and we've been in this position for 6 years and settled. we will continue our work. mister putting thank you for a conservatism issue. i'm a mother of 3 children and her. i'm a really scared heart awfully. she's fully. i thought that my 7 year a child girl that asked so choose agenda she choice and her in future should have even more in human to him and that features are appointed to her. and i hope this won't be allowed in russia, despite our openness, you've talk about korea gonzales and to and when we talk fastenal, the so called her human is take on your condition of the western idea of

u. s. or another form of financial punishment. but then on the flip side, there will also be some consequences for the u. s. 2, because this could lead to a massive talent exodus from the us if they take too hard of a stand against the crypto industry. and that would just lead to a block chain brain drain. and i mean, block chain is essentially internet 2 point now. and the only reason that the internet is what it is today is that the friendly regulatory climate that it was born in to back that. but today, greed and political agendas, a big banking, have made the entire landscape completely unfriendly for the future of us innovation and disruptive technology. right. and there was once a time when people were for the internet as a scam saying when last it was just divided. it's interesting that kind of see that same writer use towards crypto. now i want to go back to a point that you made earlier, which is one of the biggest targets here with these new guidelines with defy with the f a t s even saying it doesn't by the claim that these platforms are controlled by do centralized communities of users, and that there isn'

u. s. a. because the headlines were you, they saw the big picture is a flex financing to nation on this week show ever get the feeling you're being watched.

u. s. u. k. policy because of the invasion of iraq. i mean, i, the, i the way with them i, well, maybe it all goes back to british imperialism in the 1900. everything does a mazda. huh. no, this is more recent over the, the 2001 war i should. i mean, before we leave have get a chance to just quickly say, you have warned that a taliban victory in global gives them potential access to 150 nuclear weapons. what do you mean that was misquoted from a, from an earlier interview. what i have said was, i worry that the take over by taliban in afghanistan could provide aid and comfort to radicals in pakistan. pakistani taliban itself, other terrorist groups that the pakistani government created along with the extremist in the inner services, intelligence directorate, and other parts of the pakistani military if those extremists took control and pakistan than that government would have access to the country store nuclear weapons. and so it, did you make that point and when you are a national security advisor and what no one listened to you, the

u. s. committed the killing of so many civilians, the torture that the u. s. was involved in that the international criminal court would like to pursue, but can't because of us pressure. the corruption that is talked about is always talked about on the part of the afghans but not the u. s. companies. the weapons companies that made hundreds of millions of dollars from this disastrous fiasco a scenario like blackboard or the interrogators like tight and the i'm believe it was more profit during that wind. i'm for 20 years. yeah. we didn't hear about all the civilian deaths. we didn't hear about any of the things that the american people deserve to know or why the generals year after year were telling us that victory was just around the corner. so yes, as far as i'm concerned, i didn't scrap to scratch the surface of what we needed to hear and we still, i deserve to know. you know, david, the, the way i look at this 20 year old fiasco deadly and very expensive. it was just a grip, there was a business model, and everybody made out except for a soldiers that died needlessly. and of course, afghans. but at, if you step back and look at it as a business model, you must ma

u. s. a. that stands separately and apart from what u. s. maintains here just because of the obvious fact of the presence of you and yet, crap quarters on the u. s. soil. thus we can not just equalize the numbers one for one. but apart from all these we also have unnecessary restrictions. are, you know, an impossibility for the u. s. to see the obvious which is in the u. s. is absolutely able and capable to come up in their numbers in the russia to 455, which is an established cap that was established several years ago. and to feel these margin between what they have here currently and these cap with whoever them want service people for their huge compound, a diplomatic officers or cancer people to re engage in a normal we are on visa services and things like this. we tried to explain all these to us. there is no flexibility, they only want us to come lower in our numbers. they demand all sorts of things that the do not fit into our system. therefore, we said this is the way to nowhere further detail ration may take place. and you know what, we may even freeze the func

u. s or, oh, e u relations. why? because or, for example, of france as he's no own or room m i t m, bomb and nuclear weapons. but germany does not have nuclear weapons where it behaves, but it cannot produce them each se, the share. originally the u. s. and they depend on the american gra, umbrella, a, so they, they added a double truck position. they are a steel stick to nato, for our security and or so to keep readership we've sometimes tub european countries war a suspicious of russia at the same time, germany as an economic power. no perfectly that if you were on germany wants to be strong economic, you know, the need russian and a cas a. so there is a defacto audience between germany and russia, demps of energy. so there's a very complicated world where you can have different audiences on a jo, strategic, or g o economic or a traumatic event. oh, so you are a member states a fine long time. didn't have any responsibility for a security. will very few of it a where dependent of the u. s. and know it's very difficult to t

because the whole point of u. s. foreign policy is to open up markets for certain trans national trade corporations and so forth. this is allowed the us to have. it's had your money, america's greatest preponderance isn't. it isn't military. in fact, although it might seem like that it's the u. s. dollar and it's, it's economic preponderance is financial preponderance more than military. military is just a tool to open up, to allow it to dominate globally financially. but i think george pointed out something that's interesting, you know, the middle east will become in a new cold war with china. the middle east will become a sort of contested zone. aw, george or wells geopolitical map in 1084. this endless war with east asia, but the middle east is changed and changed because of us action. so there is now an arc of resistance that very well network to very well equipped and fortified, which stretches from iran all the way to lebanon. that's a direct result of us and its allies, various operations and escapades in pla

u. s. department, the u. s. military industrial complex because he's a pause in the fight that ever been involved in war crimes, talks or god knows was as a things done now, it isn't prison in america that's going to kill him. the fact that the americans were not leg goal will not allow him to get out of the tension. i mean, i'm, the truth is where if georgia assigned life is going to be fair, it probably needs a political process rather than a judicial process. the politicians need to stop petition that ahead. let this man live. just coming up to 17 minutes past the hour still ahead. the country on the brink of starvation and then old enemy, once again varying incidentally, the tele bombs feeling the pressure in the gun. this done just 2 months after rechecking the reins of power. that's coming up. i i, i ah. herman by a dreamer shaped by concur center, those with airs sinks. we dare to ask oh, hello again. it's been almost 2 months since the tele bombs returned to power in afghanistan. following the chaotic us withdrawal on the challenges are piling up. an economic crisis is not being compounded with the thr

u. s. military. that's what it boils down to for him. groups like amnesty international and reporters without borders, say that they agree that he is being singled out because he was publishing information which the u. s. government did not want to be published. reporters without borders. say that he does not have the enjoy the protection under the 1st amendment to journalistic free speech. and they say that the u. s. is actually made clear that because he's not a us citizen, he wouldn't get that. and also the espionage charges do not have a public interest defense. so they're very worried about the precedence this could set for journalists in future. and i think also the fact that i'm in recent months, it's been reported that the cia disgust kidnapping, or assassinating him when he was in the ecuadorian embassy. that's worrying in terms of the motivation of u. s. government, but also adds weight to his legal team's arguments. that his mental health would actually be severely or rather, his risk of suicide will actually be elevated. now if he were to be sent to the us, if in fact it is true that at some point american authorities were considering taking no

u. s. right. exactly because russia is being accused by a number of western politicians of trying to keep the price as high as possible. but that announcement by the russian president to boost supplies to europe actually caused a price decrease of 20 percent during this energy crisis. and just 2 days after that, us congressman michael mccaul. busy was calling for the resumed the resumption of sanctions against russia in connection to the north stream to pipeline. and we have to ask why he says, because somehow rushes trying to weaponized that president biden and chancellor merkel committed to taking action. should russia attempt to use energy as a weapon? yet both of tend to blind eye to the puts in regimes deliberate efforts to pressure europe into accelerating the russian node stream to pipeline certification process by manipulating europe's gas markets and leveraging a severe energy crisis on the continent. now, mccaul, there, of course, accuses angle of merkel of turning a blind eye to some malign, influenced by russia, but actually anglo merkel herself, has said that a russia always fulfills i

because china had recovered faster from cove it and had a sharper v like bout. so according to his logic, china, congestion should be even worse than that of the u. s. but china does it because they have the infrastructure. and while not in the most efficient category, 3 of china's biggest ports are ranked among the top 5 in the same survey. so there's really no quick fix as the union pacific rail executive said that while making the port operational 247 will help incrementally. this is a long term problem. and so far this hasn't even made a dent in it. yeah, you gotta leave it to politicians. it's been a story to say that it's because we're just doing too well. that's why we're having these unprecedented issues. boom. bends on. and kristi, i thank you so much for your insight. the while the markets are mix this week as investors continue to keep an eye on the state of rising inflation and the ongoing supply chain constraints. we start in russia where the mo, x is down roughly 1.5 percent for the weak rocha's central bank increase interest rates on friday by $75.00 basis points to 7.5 percent. this was the 6 the increase since the start of the year.

because i would agree with marcus that the u. s. wants to can maintain at least some form of influence there because it's the, the taliban is reaching out to others. and we have to remind everyone part of the trump deal was that our groups like al qaeda and isis will had to be had to be under control. meaning they would be using afghanistan as a base for foreign endeavors here. so there's a lot of mixed commentary again, it because of the emotional shock for so many people that were so vested in the war and they're getting a pedal that narrative. so i think things are in flux here. but when patrick reacted with marcus and to say it was very interesting. yeah. you could say or comment on what? continuing. marcus, this point, i think you can go off to the segue. but in the early ninety's, when the taliban took power, it was, it was, you know, a lot of people in the west don't realize that a lot of people in afghanistan at that time saw them is the lesser of 2 evils. because all these warlords, northern alliance types that the u. s. h