u. s. defense department 3 described in our world. and it was to destroy quite the feeling of trust sanders, which the leak sent for gravity. this what do we achieve with threats of exposure and criminal prosecution? and on related thing i've sold on rent view taishan back in 2010. there was a lease of a document that was prepared by law firm acting on behalf of bank of america. the fund stretched for advise the us government on strategy. the strategy was in jail for me is to drag him from country to country to back in 2010. when they 1st released the children. many leaks we see leaks came under an extra legal banking blockade. so that we see leaks had the paypal cancelled visa, mastercard cut off donations. it wasn't the 1st time but a whole and major credit card companies are united in creating a blockades on a media organization. julian, even had these coastal bank account closed. they adopted the coin, is the currency the the news issue for the better shouldn't be done. losing innocent english escape and able to see him in this ge

u. s. navy is been active in just a month ago, a us, and that you'd be warship shut down multiple drugs and 3 cravens myself, the, the us defense department spokesperson said, with fide from human and heading potentially towards israel. so this is something perhaps that they would have been worried about and it is an area that they've been active in. all right, john, thanks for that. you on home life was in a washington. let's speak now to have that salute who's in occupied east jerusalem for us. so we had that bit benjamin. that's and yeah, i was saying that this is, there's an iranian that, ronnie, is that to blame here? what else is riley's saying about the ship? busy as well, this really is have released multiple statements condemning the hijacking of the ship saying that it came under it on in guidance and that it has serious implications for the safety of international shipping companies. overall. the, remember, these really is our, our assuring that this is not and is really ship with no is really on board. and that it is actually a british vessel. but our own findings show that while it is british registered, it is in fact owned b