u. s. different though, to the us list of state sponsors of terrorism or countries face certain economic challenges once listed, should be pointed out. the russia is not on bath list, though the russian of foreign ministry did have this reaction to the resolution. you repeat, parliament adopted resolution recognizing russia as a sponsor of terrorism. i propose to recognize the european parliament as a sponsor of christianism, while among course the label russia but also support ukraine. the resolution went further and evidently determined, i guess at the end of the day who is allowed to report the so called truth in ukraine. the eel parliament appeals to all russian people, one only to refuse to be direct into this war, but also to protest against the atrocious war crimes against the people of ukraine commenced. the war of ukrainian and the international journalist hotel, the world, the truth about the war and ukraine often risk in their own lives to do so. now this comes as even on the ukrainian side of the frontline locals of admitted strong support for russia. while western media outlets weren't

u. s. positions differently. that certainly i'm like on our knee. my knee does torn, he's out of a phone, a name, or name car, you know, shown garnish via the building damage for all time vasey zips tune. the mountain western world generally considers hitler's naziism to be thing a typical of europe. in democracies. the fear is, doctrinal, superior and inferior races, rather appeared out of thin air in europe due to an unlucky turn of events, a pre requisites for it, but never existed before. but here's the pre world war, met the u. k. ad colonies in africa, india, china. the commonwealth of australia, asia, north and south america from said captured half of africa and half of indo china. belgium possessed congo. germany had colonies in africa, asia, south america, and osi. anya, italy established colonies in somalia, ethiopia, libya, and eritrea. the were spanish colonies in south america and africa. portugal occupied colonies several times, its own size and population. the usa also kept up with the europeans. and so by the early 20th century, most

u. s. positions differently that only i'm like on our knee. my knee does tone. is that of a phone and name or do you cry? you know, shown garnish via the building damage for all time, buffy zips tune a. the mountain western world generally considers hitler's naziism to be thing a typical of europe. in democracies, the fear is, doctrinal, superior and inferior race is rather appeared out of thin air in europe. due to an unlucky turn of events, a pre requisites for it had never existed before. but here's the pre world war met the u. k. at colonies in africa, india, china. the commonwealth of australia, asia, north and south america. from said captured half of africa and half of indo china. belgium possessed congo. germany had colonies in africa, asia, south america, and osi anya, italy established colonies in somalia, ethiopia, libya, and eritrea. the were spanish colonies in south america and africa. portugal occupied colonies several times. its own size and population. the usa also kept up with the europeans. and so by the early 20th century, most of the world w

u. s. positions differently. that only i'm like on our knee, my knee does torn. he's a very thorough, a name, or name car, you know, shown garnish via the building damage for all time vasey zips tune. and the mountain western world generally considers hitler's naziism to be something a typical of europe. in democracies. the fear is, doctrinal, superior and inferior races rather appeared out of thin air in europe due to an unlucky turn of events, a pre requisites for it, but never existed before.

u. s. positions differently that only i'm like on our knee. my knee does.

u. s. and russia, a totally different situation now with obviously very extensive trade ties between the u. s. in china and also china, the rest of the world are different situation a, but still a very, very profound kind of show down to between 2 mighty powers with very different visions of what kind of a world they want to live in. and eats of suspecting that the other wants to hinder her, their achievement of that world that they want to live in. it obviously has a lot of parallels to the 20th century cold war in that sense, in terms of tie one yet joe biden said, when asked about, did he think of the chinese are planning to invade taiwan? he said words to the extent that i do not believe there is any imminent intent by china to invade taiwan. now, the thing is, i don't think anybody really believes that china does imminently intend to invade taiwan. the concerns are more on other levels, concerns are on the one hand, that the chinese intimidation against taiwan. the chinese said dig out fighter jet or to fly across what's called the median line in the taiwan straits. so closer and close

u. s. and chinese investments are bit different for us. there's a difference between real life investments and promise investments. the u. s. tend to be better in terms of realized investment and the u. s. investment will come and the big ticket items like the chinese pharmacists do. what happens, individual companies will invest a few, a few 100000000, maybe a 1000000000, and then they add up, right? but it's very different from the big ticket stuff that the p r c brings along. so with the biting numbers, they seem somewhat small, but they add up because companies, us companies and others will follow we'll have to even for the timing the thank you so much for joining us today, professor, you and john from the national university of singapore. thank you. so much i thank you. the china has ease some of its tightest covert restrictions to do with florentine durations and conditions for airlines. the relaxation and rules comes as light relief for many chinese citizens . tired of nearly 3 years of a 0 covert policy that seen impromptu lock town

u. s. and china are strategic rivalries is because of these ideology differences. and these geopolitical differences feed into the economy because the u. s. doesn't want to help boost the chinese military by giving it micro chips that are produced either in the u. s. or through with allied taiwan. so it's imposed these restrictions. so taiwan is the central issue in these talks in, in macroeconomic terms, just as much as there is a geopolitical issue. now there's been increasing nervousness in the west about dependencies on china. for example, with photovoltaics. the majority of those are produced in china. did we see dependencies as an issue that was discussed today? i think hanging over the hang over these talks. first of all is the threat of global recession. i think that's the reason that the talks took place. and one of the things driving the possibility of a global recession has been the problems with supply chains with the, the supply chains because of covered and then because of other tensions. i've faced a lot of difficulties as we've all seen over the last

u. this differs from the u. s. list of state sponsors of terrorism, where countries phase economic consequences once was dead. we discussed the issue with human rights lawyer, daniel kalak, who says that resolutions like these are ironic as they are actually extremely dangerous. i think it just adds fuel to the fire certainly. but i just want to say that how ridiculous that is, you know, people need to be reminded that the 1st world leader to call george w bush, after 911, was potent to offer condolences offer help on the war in terror and gave help in the war in terror, particularly an afghan stay where russia still had assets after the soviet presence there. and of course, well, and i've been to syria twice. i was last year and there you see that the russians have help fight ice is there while it's the u. s. in the west, which is help them at time. right. so that's the irony of these types of resolution . but they're dangerous resolutions because what it means is that it's going to cut russia off from the west o

and that is, is really arab muslim relations and how they differ from the u. s. position which remains a now progressively forlorn hope for a 2 state solution to the differences between palestine, palestinians, and israelis. so this will just be a little bit of friction, additional friction but whether it will have more substantive effect. i'm not sure, but i think the substance is the friction next. all right, that's glen carl, joining us from boston. thank you so much for joining us on al jazeera. ah, us president joe biden says he had a blunt discussion with china's leader fusion ping as the 2 met for a long awaited talks on the eve of the g. 20 summit in indonesia. it was their 1st face to face meetings in the bite and took office nearly 2 years ago. she called taiwan the 1st red line that must not be crossed, while biden objected to what he called china's aggressive actions towards ty pay. but both liter stressed the need to get relations back on track, amid heightened tensions between the superpowers and they agreed to cooperate on challenges like climate

u. this is different to the u. s. list of state sponsors of terrorism, where countries face economic consequences once listed, despise them. discussions russia has not been listed as such by washington a french member of the european parliament was among those voting. he told archie france that the only thing this resolution promotes is further conflict. so can you find actual secrets of normal that the actions of the you lead to an escalation of the conflict? it, instead of contributing to the conclusion of the peace treaty of having voted this week for resolution, recognizing russia as a state sponsor of terrorism before the european parliament perceives exclusively its own communicated tasks. and since there is no concept of a state sponsor of terrorism in the european legal, please return my call. our parliament is saturated with unconditional hatred towards russia. these parliaments will support any measure that goes against moscow's policy, even if it will not bring any benefits to e. u has exhausted all possib

u. this is different from the u. s. list of state sponsors of terrorism, where countries do face economic consequences once listed r t takes a closer look at western double standards, which are once again emerged amid the recent resolution declaring russia, dots, date, sponsor of terrorism. the deliberate attacks and atrocities carried out by the russian federation against the civilian population of ukraine, the destruction of civilian infrastructure and other serious violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. amount to acts of terror against the ukrainian population and constitute war crimes. they do pay in parliament seems to have a very selective memory. and that appears that the only people who are categorized as victims are those that the west supports anything else or anyone else is ignored . so let's break it down a tax against the civilian population of ukraine. well, where was the european parliament in the last 8 years? thousands of ukrainians had been killed by their own so far. and remem

u. s. officials is a lot different in dealing with protesters when the state they're opposing represents the interests of the red, white, and blue. the united states strongly condemned the acts of violence, looting, and destruction that have recently occurred in haiti. and those who instigated these events for their own ends. patients throughout the country and across the social spectrum need to create the conditions that will allow a democratically elected government to take office as soon as possible. a full 180 degree turn from 2004. when the u. s. was widely believed to have been on the other side of the barricades supporting violent regime change in that very same country. by the way, if we go back to moldova, we see the same jekyll and hyde style foreign policy. the u. s. as these current protests are controlled by moscow, but when they warrant pro russia, it was a different story. we encourage government authorities to continue to show restraint. citizens of a democracy have the right to assemble and express their views in a peaceful manner. we encourage all mould of on citizens t

u. s. sanctions pointless us sanctions against foreign oil from, from russia, from venezuela, from so many different countries. now the u. s. is desperate for oil, and they can't afford to antagonize an ally or you know, what, we do something sort of like an ally in that region. and so it's, it would be very surprising to me if this was not part of some larger negotiation. just a couple of weeks ago i opened, plus matt and saudi arabia said that, you know, we need to put the price of oil up by then it hughes, the saudi of siding with russia. i mean that so i'm just trying to get the best out of both low the and try and make friends of the saudi again is always fun. and i think it's probably part of a larger negotiation much which i'm sure is going on behind the scenes. but you wouldn't, i mean, it was such a bad, a bad politics to refuse to go after somebody who's involved in such a brutal assassination of a journalist. i'd say to founded on freedom of the press, freedom of the press exist in the united states before the united states was the united states. that's how, how fundamental it is to us to

u. s. government, under a different administration, was largely silent about that act of economic aggression. was that experience of isolation? what propelled cutter to deepen its relationship with the current administration and so many fronts that have been discussed, whether it be ukraine or afghanistan or any other issue? john, thank you. first here in, in cutter. as we've noted, we've launched the 5th edition of our strategic dialogue. that is work that started well before the world cup is continuing during the world cup and it will continue after the world cup. and in that, as we've discussed, we are working on the broad array of issues that join our countries together as well as working through areas where we have some. some differences also happens at the world cup is on right now, and i make no bones about having the pleasure to actually come and cheer on team usa and it's, and it's helping match something i was really both proud to do as an american. and yes, please to do as a long time soccer fan and, and player. but the, the main point is, is this, the, the work that we're doing i

u. s. delegations have attended numerous climate service in the last decade. is there anything different about their approach this year? yeah, the as a top looter, the u. s. has been going to the summit and has always been making promises. but this is the 1st time that they have significant climate legislation that it can point to back home. because earlier this year, president joe biden signed into law the inflation reduction act, which includes a $369000000000.00 package to tackle climate change. so some of money, for example, would go to tax incentives for renewable energy technologies like wind and solar. and analysts say this could cut emissions by 40 percent by 2030. but critics say that's still not enough because the official us target is a 50 percent cut. right. okay, i will. we herbert us envoy climate and by john kerry there, he's introduced a plan to raise cash for climate action in the developing world. just give us your take on that. and it's a very controversial plan because it proposes voluntary market where companies can buy carbon credits and to offset their greenhouse e