u. s. does have a key role because in the early 2000 and the u. s. that we want to take the lead role and i suffer nato's role was diminished. so i believe the u. s. does have a responsibility to show a commitment to the african people that it will do what is needed to send a message to pockets on and the hash tag that it's trending worldwide. it's sation pockets on. and it's that unity amongst the african people that they want to live in peace with their neighbors, but they don't want them to intervene and create di to create instability in their country. and so yes, you have to take a role in this because they have been, you know, part of the process. and these backroom deals that the can, people have felt and the government has felt that the u. s. peace on boy has had with the taller bond, as we're seeing today, has failed. so more international cooperation is needed. if the u. s. is not going to step back in good to get your perspective their money and my touch. joining staff from los angeles, thank you. thank you, i'm plenty more ahead to all thi

u. s. and its partners. video to show a former nato bass. there is dependent pentagon does rush to retreat. the u. s. president sees the evacuation i relies on taliban cooperation completion bargains. 31st depends upon the tale bond continuing to cooperate and allow access to the airport for those who are trans, we're transporting out no disruption to our operation. in addition, i've asked the pentagon and the state department for contingency plans to adjust the time table should that become necessary? let me remind you that the deadline for the american withdrawal is the 31st of august. i can very my message again to the americans to evacuate all its allies by this time because they have the capability, they have planes, they have the airport, they must evacuate all the troops, and those people who are linked to foreigners. despite the withdrawal being well underway, prominent us politicians and retired generals are demanding that troops should remain. but it does seem that mainstream outlets these people are being heard on or ignoring the fact that some do have vested int

u. s. does pass for other countries and things like health and education that the u. s. has already contributed to and has a made subsist substantial gains primarily in the urban areas. but hopefully the taller bond will let education in the rule areas continue and not just religious education, but civic education. and certainly with coal would we hope that they will be reaching out to the international community for assistance in colbert alleviation. i'd like to get your take on this as a all me veteran. many of the us veterans who serve in the country suffered to terrible physical possible loss as one of many of them will now be saying, was that really worth it? what was this all for? what's your take on this is somebody who served in the military and what's the mood among the veterans of sacrifice so much in the country? well, it's a question that we ought to be asking politicians before they start these wars. the same thing happened or be at nom yeah, non veterans here. it is 50 years later asking the same thing. the veterans on iraq, the veterans of afghanistan, all

does the us go from here? what will be the us as role in or moving forward in afghanistan, the u. s. has no diplomatic presence there, but even though there is no military or diplomatic presence in the country, that does not mean the u. s. does not have interest in the country. it certainly does in the future of the country. so i think that is where you start to see by an layout his vision for where that goes from here. and i think you'll probably see him say we were going to potentially potentially work with the taliban and the government, whatever government they set up. but the u. s. he'll probably say what they've been saying. we do not trust the taliban. we do not trust their words. we will wait to see what their actions are money. thanks for that. gabriel. as onto their 1st live in washington dc or the un security council adopted a resolution urging for the safe passage for people who want to leave off kind of stone. but it's not known if the taliban will go along with this. the u. s. hope the resolution will protect people's rights to leave afghanistan, no matter. the reason qu

u. s. does not want to be bulk down in the streets. i'm going to stand trying to keep peace and security and they would like to hand that over to the regional allies. names focused on and focused on has very close relations with oliver and focused on it will stop contracts that use interest to the tolerable and the following will go on to sub contract to the local commanders and the tribal elders will then looked up, construct that to the individuals with the currency of religion was coming off in the jan is not going to get them far in their fight against the threats office by the stomach, a state the fall of $1.00 bond would soon need some dollars. if i'm going to call in the collapse of the all of them, because the u. s. want to help with internet kimmy who does not want to help the tall one will not use their limited resources to fight the isis in effect, the isis has become an asset for the all of our resorts for the college and the regional government. right, that's an interesting way of looking at it. jude will the us then conti

u. s. makes rule for china should do, but it does. so it's so this created, it will explain a lot of the from, from the us towards china, the china, on the other hand, it started to look towards us. well, in the way of a model s d, my pointed out as well, it's a political system. i don't really do much at the moment. it's very much polarized, seem to be undergoing a cultural evolution. technological they're, they're, they're struggling as well. they're economy, it's in bad shape, infrastructures enfolding. you have this huge concentration of wealth, social, economic presentation. even america, allies, really, as we discussed with more stream, is really taking their orders anymore. and so that they don't see the united states united states in relative decline, which is a reasonable conflict. terese so, so why, why should they be lectured around by the united glenn people in china that remember the great cultural revolution. and they saw how devastating it was for china and seeing traces of it emerged in the, in the, in the u. s. and th

u. s. is a committed partner. well, at the same time demonstrating that the u. s. does want to get back to the iran deal and doesn't want to completely isolate iran. of course, it will come back and try to present a case of how dangerous iran is and that there is a lot more enrichment of uranium and that iran is really a menace to the region. but we'll see that i don't think they're completely on the same page about this. young cas, natalie bennett, says he wants a fresh stop with us. is he going to get it? i think he'll get it for one very simple reason. at least that will give him some credit from the outset that he's not benjamin antonio. right? there's no secret that benjamin and funny are when the democratic party in united states have had a long history of tension. and it's coming talking about a new spirit and new start and new government in jerusalem that can not necessarily see i similar to what natasha said on issues of extreme importance for his or whether it's the iranians or even the palestinian issue, which we might talk about they're definitely not gonna

u. s. does not recognize eagles in a world based on global dominance. so it's the size of china, so which is the problem because usually in diplomacy, you tried to map out our strategic interests was yours. can we mitigate or harmonize interest or at least respect the strategic interest and try to reduce the area of rivalry in here. they're very mush clear that the child has to be cut down and, and that's why it's there. it's often expressed in the language, ultimatums and threats, which of course, is very familiar to the russians. and so the corporation doesn't entail china making a lot of unilateral concessions. and again, hillary clinton famously wrote that, i don't want my grandchildren to grow up in the world lead by china. so it's not simply that the r, as in interest are always competing. it's the mere price of it. so i think maybe the chinese very defensive, the field. there's that they're being circled much like the rational. so that's good reasons. i mean, the u. s. s. launched economic war to undermine me. military containment of china, which

u. s. does withdraw on that deadline. the shadow foreign secretary of the opposition labor party here in the u . k. is urging bars, johnson not just to come up with a plan, not just to push president by didn't on ellis, but for a longer term plan, including to help countries such as pakistan which have already received millions of african refugees over the years and expected to receive more in the near future, she says that boris johnson can play a leadership role in trying to get the 7 nations to try to agree, some sort of assistance plan for the region that involved. thank you. how the taliban insists it will allow civilians to leave afghanistan, even off the foreign forces withdraw. but many afghans are skeptical and continue to arrive at cobble airport, hoping to get out. shawna bellis reports from their sales people at cobble airports going nowhere beyond the gauge of playing us. president biden promised would take them away, but it shops, so they giosel from position the criteria who is most recent by the telephone f

u. s. does leave on august, the 31st is plan or sammy, the signals are they don't. which is why they'd like some more time. now the u. k. is armed forces minutes. the james, he p has been speaking on monday, outlining what we've already done in terms of evacuation from cobbler airport, saying that they've got 6000 people out of the country over the last week. but also saying that the u. k is focusing now on lifting around 1800 u. k. passport holders from afghanistan, and around 2300 people who are already on the case, africa, regular cations, and assist and assistance policy. so already on an approved list, he says that will happen if there is the time and the capacity that he's reiterated . the bar is johnson, the prime minister will try to persuade president biden during that virtual g 7 meeting on tuesday to extend his self imposed deadline. which is a week on tuesday, but the british defense secretary has accepted that without the presence of those $6000.00 or so us personnel. coble airport. the continuation of british efforts is very, very unlikely. i don't thin

u. s. does withdraw on that deadline. the shadow foreign secretary of the opposition labor party here in the u. k. is urging bars, johnson not just to come up with a plan, not just to push president biden on ellis, but for a longer term plan, including to help countries such as pocket stone, which have already received millions of african refugees over the years and expected to receive more in the near future, she says that boris johnson can play a leadership role in trying to get the g 7 nations to try to agree. some sort of assistance plan for the region will fill hail on al jazeera. we'll hear from me guns. he was k television rule. the cell is a new life in the united states that story after the a ah, it's time for the journey with sponsored by capital airways. hello. good to be with you. thanks for tuning in. we have had aggressive rain for is a pacific along the yellow river valley. so young joe, about a month ago, we had a years worth of rain in the span of a few days. so these provinces are just south in south west

u. s. government and blake and myself has said over and over that the u. s. simply does not trust the taliban. they want to see there were their actions more than their words in terms of the number of us citizens are still in afghanistan that want to get out. but we're not able to blink and said that number is less than 200 people. and he said that he expects that the taliban will live up to they're both public and private assurances to us officials that those people will be allowed to leave freely as well as any other afghans that want to as well. but bottom line is the military and diplomatic presence of the u. s. is now completely out of afghanistan for the 1st time in 20 years. and you referred to the pentagon there. we've also had from general frank mckenzie, who over saw that pull out for kennesaw, and he gave us a very frank and detailed statement about what that exactly involves. what were the highlights? yeah, i mean there are several how i mean i think what struck me is that he was after 20 years of the us bombing the taliban, essentially. now the u. s. on thei

u. s. government does not have a lot of capacity, inability to monitor that enough. time is going to draw pretty rapidly. i think already the u. s. is not a lot of capacity use, government can try to coordinate more with the chinese and the russians, i think in joint diplomatic front, which tries to pressure the dollar on some of these concern is, has the best chance of being effective, any unilateral effort a you know, latham sanction unilateral damped at you know, getting the dollar bon, recognizing the withholding the ignition, you know, in my view is not going to work and you're going to have similar results as, as the past few years. as funding me, they're joining me from redwood city fund. thank you very much. thanks for adding will already of the un security council adopted a resolution to let people who want to leave afghanistan do so safely, but it's not known. if the taliban will help us, hope the resolution will protect people's rights to leave afghanistan. no matter the reason consistent with the right to leave any country including one's own, everybody mu

u. s. government does not track americans movements when they travel around the world. when americans visit a foreign country or if they reside there, we encourage them to enroll with the u. s. embassy. whether they do or not is up to them is voluntary. and then when americans leave a foreign country, it's also up to them to de enroll. again. that's a choice, not the requirement. particularly given the security situation that can stand for many years, we have urged americans not to travel there. we've repeatedly asked americans who are not going to stand to enroll. and since march of this year, we've sent 900 separate messages to americans enrolled with the embassy and campbell, encouraging and then urging them to leave the country. we've amplified those direct messages on the state department website. and on social media, we even made clear that we would help pay for their repatriation. and we provided multiple communication channels for americans to contact us if they are in afghanistan and want help in leaving the specific estimated number of americans in afghanistan

u. s. jet now, does the pentagon says it's preparing to accept 22000 asylum seekers? u. s embassy cobble and also been evacuated with stuff fling in a helicopter to the capitals airport. and said to comparisons being made on line to similar evacuation almost 50 years ago. during the war in vietnam, washington though insist that there are no parallels to events in saigon. let's take a step back. this is manifestly not saigon. we're working to make sure that our personnel are safe and secure. we're relocating the minimum of our embassy to a location at the airport. it's why the president sent in a number of forces to make sure that as we continue to draw down our diplomatic presence, we do it in a safe and orderly fashion. we discussed the ongoing situation in afghanistan with former u. s. navy intelligence officer, steven rogers. he says that he can't help but are parallels with what happened to vietnam. the goal was to ensure that the app in government was strong, that it was a nation where the people were free. it was a nation, ruled by a constitution and not ruled by an

u. s. and his partners. this video does show a form and nato bass. there is the pentagon rushes to retreat. the u. s. president also says that america is on track to finish its mission. enough can a stand by the end of this month, the top us diplomatic way, but just say the different options are currently being discussed. the tall about have made clear that they have a strong interest in having a functioning airport. we and the rest of the intricate national community certainly have a strong interest in that. primarily for the purpose of making sure that anyone who wants to leave can leave pass the the 31st. and again, with regard to our own potential presence going forward after the 31st. we're looking at a number of options. let me remind you that the deadline for the american withdrawal is the 31st of august. i can very my message again to the americans to evacuate all its allies by this time because they have the capability, they have plains, they have the airport, they must evacuate all the troops, and those people who are linked to foreigners. d

u. s. government does have a moral obligation to try to extend some sort of assistance to them. this is anthony blinking speaking in the last hour. today, the state department is announcing a new resettlement program for afghans who assisted the united states, but who do not qualify for special immigrant reasons. we've created a priority to or p to designation, granting access to the u. s. refugee admissions program for many of these afghans and their family members. a great deal of hard work has gone into this already, but even more lies ahead. now this might sound like good news for the many thousands of afghan citizens who worked with the u. s. government either for a short period than they would otherwise be qualified to get the special immigrant visa, or for those who worked with american based media organizations or n g owes. but the hard part is this. there are an estimate it tens of thousands of people who could be covered by this program. they have to leave afghanistan in order to be able to apply for this program. there's no way that the u. s. government says that it's

u. s. forces does have more than one day. oh pamela, have a message to the honorable people of laska and brothers and sisters. we will be fighting. please evacuate your families from all those houses were tele banner. even in the neighbourhood. it will be very hard fighting. we will not leave the taliban allies at any cost. i know it will be very hard for you and it was also a hard decision for me to. i don't want to hurt my people, but i'm fighting for my people the way i fight for the brothers and sisters of my homeland and for your future. please forgive us if you get to the place and please evacuate as soon as possible from all those areas where the taliban will come. but we will be targeting all of those areas. and diplomatic at a james base are joining us live now from couple of james, this kind of announcement from the african military is unusual, isn't it? yes, it is unusual to certainly that have been occasions in the past where they've asked people to leave their homes. but not in one of the biggest cities of afghan

u. s. leadership still does not have a single clue how to contain the fall out of this disastrous withdrawal. i cannot promise with the final outcome will be we don't have the capability to go out and collect of large numbers of people. the u. s. was caught unawares and i think once again, they have failed to analyze what the situation was. it really puts on full display, the delusions of the u. s. which after all, has been in afghanistan for almost 20 years. consuming, according to some estimates, 2 trillion dollars. this money has not gone to the benefit of the afghan people, obviously. and this whole enterprise has been very bad for the american people as well. many us soldiers have died. the good thing about exposing the delusions of the u. s. empire and the neo conservative to run u. s. foreign policy is that it's going to make them harder to continue. so there needs to be a lot more criticism and exposure of what the reality is versus what are the promises and the, the false estimates by us intelligence officials. now, many people weren't lucky enough to get a flight out of cabal this

u. s. doesn't as much as any other government does. it. what the u. s. doesn't do with the government is ransomware attacks. so if you complete everything to look like it's the same problem, then you can say, oh, it makes sense that we shut it all down, but you're not, shouldn't evolve down because the u. s. is an active player in hacking. technology is more of a say do as we say, not as we do kind of situation. now, after this meeting, amazon said it would make it cyber security training available to the public for free. and it would give multi factor authentication devices to some cloud computing customers. starting in october, what kind of a difference can this make? well, you can make a huge difference. i only laugh at it because amazon a w. s is probably the largest cloud computing contractor in the entire world, right? google and ibm and, and amazon really control almost all of this cloud space. why don't you, why do you not already have as just a standard operating procedure, multi factor authentication? why is that not already built into the syst

u. s. repeating, what does it mean for them? are they going to be energized? you have actors against china active in this region. so it's not about mother up like people in africa and middle east copying on the part by the while. so although that could happen as well, but it's also the region, it's still over. but in the region, even if you're not talking about like paul about actually having ties with that, which they do, you want to that, that the ties up there. if you just talk about what it means for, don't even know. don't think about logistically if you don't think what it militarily you don't think about it even into the safe haven. what does it mean? like logically it is absolutely terrifying prospect because to ponder on the sick. but the consequence of this, both for the world that he had and possibly attempt at so many minutes intervention with the hopes of changing space and propping up maybe be able to building institutions and time forming countries and other actors. and honestly, doctors who had hopes to trouble their government and the power us