u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3 to 9 and select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right. as the u. s s all was devastated by wal. united states last about $400000.00 people at the brits last less than the americans did add. the soviets suffer 27000000 deaths. mm mm. but it's 7000000 is an incredible number. mm hm. way. john kennedy gave us american universities commencement address. if i to 63, he said that what the soviet suffered of world war 2 was the equivalent of the entire united states east of chicago. have you been.

u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3 to 9 and select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right. is the u. s. s. i was devastated by well, it either states last about 400000 people had the brit sloss less than the americans did. and the soviet suffer 27000000 deaths. mm. mm. 27000000 is an incredible number. john kennedy gave his american university a commencement address and that to 63, he said that what the soviet suffered of world war 2 was the equivalent of the entire united states. east of chicago. have you been destroyed? mm. initially the plan to attack the u. s. l was code named trojan over time it evolved into pincher bush, mega crankshaft of moon, coke, wheel off tackle. and sherry, dia, december 19th, 1949 saw the adoption of the best known plan to wipe out the soviets operation dropshot, date of attack, january. the 1st 1957 mm. the plan outlines the complete annihilation of the u. s. s. under the democratic guise of liberating the nations from communism that those very nations would be wiped out along with communism in the 1st

u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3 to 9. select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right. as the u. s. s. all was devastated by wall united states last about 400000 people at the brit sloss less than the americans did. and the soviets suffer 27000000 deaths. mm mm. 27000000 is an incredible number. ah, john kennedy case, american university commencement address of i 263. he said that was the soviet suffered of world war 2 was the equivalent of the entire united space. east of chicago. have you been destroyed? i initially the plan to attack the u. s. l was code named trojan.

u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3 to 9 select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right. is the u. s. s. all was devastated by well the, it either states last about 400000 people had the brit sloss less than the americans did. and the soviet suffered 27000000 deaths. mm. mm 27000000 is an incredible number. with john kennedy k, american university of commencement address it back to 63. he said that what the soviet suffered and world war 2 was the equivalent of the entire united states east of chicago. have you been destroyed? mm hm. initially the plan to attack the u. s. l was code named trojan overtime, devolved into pincher bush, lego crankshaft, half moon, cold wheel off tackle and cherry a. dia, december 19th, 1949. so the adoption of the best known plan to wipe out the soviets operation, dropshot, date of attack, january the 1st 1957. mm. the plan outlines the complete annihilation of the usa under the democratic guise of liberating the nations from communism. but those very nations would be wiped out along with communism in th

u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3 to 9 and select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right. as the u. s. s. all was devastated by wall in either states. last about 400000 people at the brit sloss less than the americans did. he had the soviets suffer 27000000 deaths.

u s. joint chiefs of staff general milley have suggested that a winter lull in fighting would be a good moment for ukraine and russia to sit down at the table and try to negotiate. kiev says that a stalemate would simply allow russia to consolidate its gains. who's right the ukrainians because they have momentum at the moment it was the person retreat by the russians was very significant military military blow to the russian army because it was completely different from the ukrainian victory in iraq. if they they were very fast, the russians were surprised, they didn't have their strongest forces there, but in in person they had their strongest force, the elite troops and they they it is so so it was really a significant loss for the russians. momentum is on the ukrainian side and what putin wants, he wants to have a pause because he wants to rebuild his army and he needs to rebuild his army. and if ukrainians pressure on he will have problems to reconsider or rebuild his army and in fact maria he needs to rebuild because at least according to the same us general, the head of the joint chiefs

u. s. joint chiefs of staff who said recently in the western press that it's time to sit down and talk. milly also said quote, we've seen the ukranian military fight the russian military to a standstill. now what the future holds is not known with any degree of certainty, but we think there are some possibilities here for some diplomatic solutions. retired us army colonel douglas mcgregor, who was the top planner for general wesley clark, when he was nato commander. and who has actually seen battle in iraq and elsewhere, unlike stoughton berg, who may or may not have gone to war with a photocopier and ended up with a paper. chi is also saying that negotiation is the best off ramp ukrainians are in bad shape. they're not prepared for what's coming. the russian so now repeatedly at night demonstrated their ability to target precisely energy, fuel, transportation, and so forth. he knows that the ukrainians are running out of those things. it won't be long before they run out of food. it won't be long before their freezer, it's time to negotiate. but unlike pentagon officials, the american

u. s. joint chiefs of staff. general milly have suggested that a winter lull in fighting would be a good moment for ukraine and russia to sit down at the table. and try to negotiate care says that a stalemate would simply allow russia to consolidate its gains, whose ray the ukrainians. because when they have momentum at the moment it's, it was the, the house on retreat by the witness was a very significant militant, military blow to the russian army. good. was completely different from the ukrainian victory am hark. if they have, they were very fast, the rushes were surprised, they didn't have their strongest forces there. but in the house one they had, this one was forced elite troops and they've, they've been edison so, so it was really a significant loss for the russians. the momentum as on the ukrainian side and what put in once he wants to have a pause because he wants to rebuild his army and he needs to rebuild his army. and if, if the ukrainians pressure on her, he will have problems too too. we concede th

u. s. joint chiefs chairman mark, milly cited earlier this month. okay, so then where is the clarification with the updated accurate figures? what exactly is the source of this quote, external estimate that the you consider to be legitimate enough to have underlined site in a speech, to someone at brussels, just write these speeches on their bathroom breaks or something, and then just pass it to vander lines, teleprompter person on the way back to their desk, why did russell simply delete the figure from everywhere like the information never even existed. a spokesman for ukrainian president vladimir zalinski calls the 100000 figure extremely far from reality. ukraine's military chief had previously said the figure of 9000 ukrainian true bloss is back in august. so why didn't you commission site that as it source, it was picked up by the western press and is publicly available just like the american estimate of the 100000. now, given the massive discrepancy between washington's estimate of ukrainian troop losses and what keeps military leadership had

u. s. joint chiefs of staff from earlier this month who claims both russia and ukraine, had each suffered more than $100000.00 soldiers killed or wounded. however, the number drastically differs from what ukrainian politicians had been saying a lot such public announcement was by ukrainian top general in late august who acknowledged nearly 9000 ukrainian military personnel had been killed. he has reportedly commented on the deletion of underlay and statements. thing information about losses is sensitive, so only top officials can voice it. we did get reaction about this from author and war correspondent, thomas roper. it disturbs there in the western and you credit narrative of the year . you craig winning the war. and it's interesting. i have found an announcement from the speaker of the commission who said that the figures were just incorrect. they were an estimation and who are not very correct. and so they deleted it. and they just used this figure to us, show the cruelty of russia. but then i have a question, does that mean that the you commission is officially lying all the time of

u. s. joint chiefs of staff who said recently in the western press that it's time to sit down and talk. milly also said, quote, we seen the ukranian military fight the russian military to a standstill. now what the future holds is not known with any degree of certainty, but we think there are some possibilities here for some diplomatic solutions. retired us army, colonel douglas mcgregor, who was the top planner for general wesley clark, when he was nato commander, and who has actually seen battle in iraq and elsewhere, unlike stilton berg, who may or may not have gone to war with the photocopier and ended up with a paper kind is also saying that negotiation is the best off ramp ukrainians are in bad shape. they're not prepared for what's coming. the russian so now repeatedly at night demonstrated their ability to target precisely energy, fuel, transportation, and so forth. he knows that the ukrainians are running out of those things. it won't be long before they run out of food. it won't be long before their freezer. it's time to negotiate. but unlike pentagon officials, the american n

u. s. joint chiefs of staff who said recently in the western press that it's time to sit down and talk. milly also said quote, we seen the ukranian military fight the russian military to a standstill. now what the future holds is not known with any degree of certainty, but we think there are some possibilities here for some diplomatic solutions. retired us army colonel douglas mcgregor, who was the top planner for general wesley clark, when he was nato commander. and who has actually seen battle in iraq and elsewhere, unlike stoughton berg, who may or may not have gone to war with a photocopier and ended up with a paper. chi is also saying that negotiation is the best off ramp ukrainians are in bad shape. they're not prepared for what's coming. the russian so now repeatedly at night demonstrated their ability to target precisely energy, fuel, transportation, and so forth. he knows that the ukrainians are running out of those things. it won't be long before they run out of food. it won't be long before they're freezing . it's time to negotiate. but unlike pentagon officials, the american

u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3292, select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right. there's the u. s. s. o was devastated by wal united states last, about 400000 people had the brit sloss less than the americans did. and the soviet suffer 27000000 deaths.

u. s. joint chiefs of staff who said recently in the western press that it's time to sit down and talk. milly also said quote, we've seen the ukranian military fight the russian military to a standstill. now what the future holds is not known with any degree of certainty, but we think there are some possibilities here for some diplomatic solutions. retired us army colonel douglas mcgregor, who was the top planner for general wesley clark, when he was nato commander. and who has actually seen battle in iraq and elsewhere unlike stolen, berg who may or may not have gone to war with the photocopier and ended up with a paper. chi is also saying that negotiation is the best off ramp you grinning is are in bad shape. they're not prepared for what's coming. the russian so now repeatedly at night demonstrated their ability to target precisely energy, fuel, transportation, and so forth. he knows that the ukrainians are running out of those things. it won't be long before they run out of food. it won't be long before their freezer, it's time to negotiate. but unlike pentagon officials, the americ

u. s. joint chiefs of staff from earlier this month who claimed that both russia and ukraine had each suffered more than $100000.00 soldiers killed or wounded. over the number drastically differs from what the ukrainian politicians had been saying. last such public announcement was made by a ukrainian top general in late august with knowledge, nearly 90000 ukrainian military personnel had been killed. he has reportedly commented on the deletion of bonder land statement saying information about. busy losses is sensitive, so only top officials can voice it. but to get more on this now we're going to cross live to discuss this issue with author and war correspond, thomas roper, thanks for joining us on the program. so what do you think prompted the deletion of this post detailing the ukrainian losses? that's a good question. well, i think it's, it disturbs there in the west and ukrainian narrative of the ukraine winning the war. it's interesting, i have just found an announcement from the speaker of the you commission who said that the figures were just incorrect. they were an estimation and were

u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3.

mirror concerns about china from american politicians and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff recently said the u. s. military should never allow china to replace it as the wells leading military force while republican congressman kevin mccarthy. his accused beijing of stealing technology and interfering in the us economy. meanwhile, following is a recent meeting with the u. s. president china's leaders using being said the asia pacific region was not anyone's backyard to stage a power struggle. i was speaking with a victor gao from the center of china and globalization, who believes that beijing just wants to deal with international partners on an even keel. that's the exactly craziness i would call your madness. that's about completely disregarding the fundamental interests of the people that the in poland, the, any of the european countries or in the world at large to talk about a wall with china. why should anyone, any country have a wall with china? china is a peace loving country. china wants to deal with every country, peoples, all as an equal. china has no desire and no intention of replacin