u. s. know that they're meant to be used against india as they were used at the time of the by like one off edition a couple of years ago. and then on top of that, they didn't. now they are not coming from washington about one thing to reinforce the fuck is that it is still under control, i should say. because the relationship with what the last part of what it is difficult to understand why they're doing this. especially as in the past focused on as a double cross them as a border, but by their bon shows does not actually participate in the killing of so many were so given by actual being devalued bond and arming them. but you seem to learn the lessons that continue to bore pakistan to issue one of forces. and this could be a danger to cancellation date of indirectly that is in the lobby, state and other forces to develop their operation against the installation in person motion to be those that agents. and secondly, the point on the india got out that you know, they have this is going to hand

u. s. and the u. k, um you know, i think the whole purpose from the western point of view for this war was to undermine russia to weaken russia in the way that the afghan war of 80 was intended to do the same to the soviet union. and it did actually have that in that, i mean, it succeeded to that extent. it's my perception that russia would be happy to end this thing now to do with those 4 republics that have voted to join russia, joining russia, crimea staying with russia, leaving the rest of the ukraine and ending it there. now, professor of all this war has been going on for several years, but i think over the last couple of weeks we've seen a notable moving of the gold post and something that used to be off limits, at least for the states i'm talking about with industrial sabotage and industrial terrorism seems to be pretty legitimate or at least normalized by the strikes on the russian gas infrastructure, as well as, according to russian intelligence, previously undisclosed to tax on a nuclear plant power plant

knows that this could lead to world war 3. this could lead to the use of nuclear weapons. the u. s. should be doing everything it can to broker a deal the end this war. and yet, as we know, the u. s. has done everything he could to provoke this conflict and to keep it going. and i just find that completely despicable really. yeah. certainly a lot of daycare and a lot of lessons to be learn human rights attorney dan corvalle. thank you for your time in analysis. thank you very much. the russian turk stream gas pipeline operator says another lens has withdrawn its export license amid wider you sanctions against moscow. this means that the turk stream, dutch subsidiary can't provide technical maintenance on the pipeline. but you're going south stream company, told archie that the measures will not affect the flow of gas, although it's asked for the license to be reinstated. the pipeline delivers more than 30000000000 cubic meters of natural gas to europe and turkey. the developments are especially significant following recent damage to the north through one and 2 pipelines. political sc

so, you know, that's gonna cause more of a supply problem. the u. s. and raise price is even more prices are going up fast, the u. s. a. partly because the oil companies are shutting down to refineries. you know, they're not, they're having these a regular maintenance. and then there's the so called fires and everything and the real bottleneck is that the refining capacity. and that's been manipulated. i believe i am, we got prices going up sharply into your side. i believe. you know, another $0.25 a gallon in california. it's already more than $7.00 a gallon. so it's really interesting that you see a u. s. pointing the finger at saudi arabia and not at its own oil companies who aren't really cooperating very much either. yeah, as mid term elections coming up may be helping as politicians want to at least have someone who they say they can blame. and speaking of placing the blame, we have some democrats saying that we ought as move was deliberate to hurt the you asked while the king them is saying that the u. s. itself is to blame for rising gas prices.

i mean what you're saying is that it's really, you know, the u. s. canada, western europe, japan and australia. they're on their own against russia. really, the rest of the world is not in even you see, saudi arabia now closing up the russia. oh thing up. but the russian oil that they used to be destined for the western market. they're buying it for roubles, the russian roubles. yeah, and the u. s. is furious about and this is one of their closest allies. so look, here's my car in the u. s. has been doing what it was without recriminations, certainly since the collapse of soviet. right. it's gone to war wherever it's wanted to go to. busy war without security council authorization and, and i think the world's tired of the work, the rest of the world is tired of the united states. and so i think they're excited . honestly, one from an emotional point of view to see the us getting kicked in the teeth a little bit. but also because the u. s. uses, you know, the dollar dominance to, oh, you know, to sanction other countries to try to control other count

know, preceded a link with putins, the nuclear threat. i think this whole kind of a fear securitized narrative helps the u. s. president and, and the white house when they try to explain why they want to rebuild relationships with pakistan. why is it still important to engage pakistan? because, you know, it's easy to go to the congress and say, hey, there is this country, which is, you know, lacks a cohesion when they say political cohesion. we have some of you know, stakeholders that support you with a strong pakistan u. s. relationship. yet some supporters who do not support that yet. it's a new piano country. it's close to the close to china. tall to close to russia. putin was threatening europe right now, it's important to engage pakistan. so i think that that narrative sells for me as who i think that's where it's coming from. security forces in bikini faster, say armed groups have killed at least 3 soldiers and 8 civilians. the group has said to have been ambushed in the northern province of time, and tenga, the latest attack comes off the september 30th crew, that owls to president left tenant, colone

u. s. does not a rule out of 1st strike, so that we know that that's u. s. policy, the u. s. gives itself permission to use nukes 1st, and we're dealing with people who are not very smart. every act of desperation makes their situation worse. they didn't destroy russia's economy, they've destroyed the economies all over the world. they've blown up this pipeline . and in effect, attacked an ally, a terrorist attack. so we're dealing with people who don't know what they're doing, who are, as you say, idiot, logically driven, who have some crazy band to see about being able to get rid of putin or have regime change. so we're in a very, very difficult situation with these people in charge at this moment inter daniel and i think all of us are, you know, we're kind of close in age here. all of us, same generation was put it that way. i how in the world as the mainstream media and the current political lead normalized nucular war because they have nothing seems real. i mean, everything is invented out of whole cloth it's, it's incredible to think about, you know, it, talk about p

u. s. does not a rule out of 1st strike, so that we know that that's u. s. policy, the u. s. gives itself permission to use nukes 1st, and we're dealing with people who are not very smart. every act of desperation makes their situation worse. they didn't destroy russia's economy, they've destroyed the economies all over the world. they've blown up this pipeline . and in effect, attacked an ally, a terrorist attack. so we're dealing with people who don't know what they're doing, who are, as you say, idiot, logically driven, who have some crazy band to see about being able to get rid of putin or have regime change. so we're in a very, very difficult situation with these people in charge at this moment in a canyon, i think all of us are, you know, we're kind of close in nature. all of us, the same, same generation was put it that way. i how in the world as the mainstream media and the current political lead normalized nucular war because they have nothing seems real. i mean, everything is invented out of whole cloth it's, it's incredible to think about, you know, it, talk abo

u. i should know better at this point as well. it's come out in the new york times, for example, in the past few days, that the u. s. intelligence community knew or now knows that ukrainian government was complicit in the car bombing of diarrhea, duke and not in moscow. so there's been an incremental escalation in actions here on the part of ukraine. now, the ball is really in europe's court. will it denounce? zalinski is dangerous rhetoric, the clearly advocates for everything it claims to stand against. just a few days ago, the western mainstream media was hyperventilating, accusing russia. nuclear blackmail over the reality. the yes, it does possess nuclear weapons. so are they now going to be freaking out over zalinski? is blayton demand that the west set off world war 3 for ukraine? there is a big question on everyone's minds right now. and i'll take contributor rachel moss and many thanks for that, rachel. i. okay. well, we're joined by a panel of guests now we're, we're joined by american experts on international security issues. marks. labeau to veteran greek diplomatically disc is on top of this on human r

well, pressure on this british liberation barrister, has been, as, as she felt, we all know that the u. s. funds, the u. n. is the biggest donor country we know from edward snowden, the bugging of secretary generals, i've spoken to a whole number of un special repertoires over the years. you've spoken to me privately. i'm not naming any of them about the pressure more back from the secretariat. as regards which side human rights violations should, should fall on. and this comes in a week in which the us all but admitted that human rights is really something to be used to further the aim of washington, the military industrial complex. ironically, hey, with the help of pharmaceutical government fire that was made by agra because of course they said, look, the human rights, the situation. saudi arabia must be looked at. not because the human rights situations out here a bit because the opec plus production can announce as regards oil supply. so i think we have to remember these are going to be regurgitated in the western press. they occur in the canadian press, the u. s. west european union,

u. s. are they not considering these things? i don't know that the us seems to be acting out of spite. i mean, the u. s. now has worn a foreign policy in spite which is kind of an incredible foreign policy. but you know, they say, you know, if the want to go after the enemy and commit revenge against it and you better dig to great, right? your enemies in your own, the us is digging its own. great. yeah. speaking of really that, back and forth, we saw that china fired a number of american employees from micro ship producing companies, which is seen as a retaliatory move. do you think that we're going to see further tit for tat actions between the u. s. and china moving forward? i think almost certainly, i mean what's gonna happen is. busy again, china and russia in concert are going to turn away from the west. they didn't want that. they wanted to be, you know, connected to the west, but by necessity, they're going to turn in word towards each other towards new partners. and in the end, it's the west, it's going to be hurt by that. you know, the china makes so many products of the united

so, you know, let's get across more of a supply problem, u. s. and raise prices, even more. prices are going up faster. the u. s. a. partly because the oil companies are shutting down to refineries. you know, they're not, they're having these a regular maintenance and then there's the out so called fires and everything. and the real bottleneck is that the refining capacity. and that's been manipulated. i believe has nothing really different going on. except it's a good excuse to blame of the saudis and opec. i said, pointing the finger at the u. s. oil companies right before an election. meanwhile, energy has also been high on the agenda. it's an eas summits in prod, the box foreign policy chief just that barrel said that the opec plus decision to slash oil production was a response to the new e u. price cap on the lining that energy has become the main geopolitical issue. luca dale decker was their decision to decrease the supply of oil, which is a clear answer to our proposal to government fries avoid the means that energy is becoming the most i

u. s. has has trouble with sanctions. if it's quite clear, you know, after 9 months that the sanctions aren't working very well. that's why europe the european commission recently is with the help of the u. s. is trying to set the global price of oil and ours, the e u g 7, acting like a, like a global cartel, which is going to just just fail. it's not going to work, but it's causing all kinds of disturbances in the global energy market. and you're gonna see gas prices, oil prices in the u. s. rising, they're already rising again by the way, in the u. s. significantly in some regions. so we got about of energy inflation about it, they go off here in the us as well. now you mentioned kind of that basic supply and demand there, right? which is if they cut production, then of course it could cause prices to rise. now politico is reporting that the ear has agreed to impose a price, tap on russian oil cells to 3rd countries. so how does that work exactly? how does this all play out? yeah, well, you know, it's kind of an act of desperation sanctioned despera

u. s. dollar. know how the government has taken such a gamble with national finances and i'm interested to hear what the founders of big coin beach think of it all. roman martinez is one of them was beautiful. that dream that started super small now is more bigger than our sub or and mainly people around the world dreaming with our country. and i actually patricia and his missionary 7 to portion of sub there into for world blankets. and that means they've got your bank account right now. bank account, any kind of financial service a now as soon speed can arrive in our community will start to seen people say, be morning people transacting digital people, receiving and making digital payments. people buying an asset for the 1st time, people sending money from all saba to the usa, from the usa to wells hobbler because beat gung is the bread monetary network. the humanity ever hot, you know, these are the big claims and i want to find out if the coin really has transformed this country. bitcoin beach seems

now especially, i mean, we know we know the u. s. has been accepting or been in other countries without any sort of authorization because they don't be held accountable. it just seems a little bit, you know, my role play by my rules, but do what i do. but when i say sort of the, all the opposition do what i say, and when i do the point, yes, the pot calling the kettle black. i mean, it even goes beyond that. i mean, we know that the us as a time supported isis, that kind of in places like syria, they supported terrorists in libya. they've supported the m e k tor terrorists against iran. so no, of course, it's a total double, double standard. and as you point now, the u. s. unilaterally invaded countries from iraq to afghanistan to libya, the somalia, to serbia. i mean, the u. s. has no ground to stand up in criticizing russia for this operation. all right, you know it's not a bad move on out of time. thanks a lot for joining us here. it was a pleasure. thank you very much. it by movie, another commander in chief of the cleans, all for

know, the votes in the u. n. we cannot just ignore africa. what, what happens in africa? much as for the rest of the world, and the u. s. can actually support some africa initiatives from africa causes whether it's, you know, join in the un security council, the permanent membership or the g 20. there are things that the u. s. can use its influence. it's convenient power influence, particularly with the european allies to push those courses for africa. political economists, dana guzman and journalist got out of go. okay, thank you so much for being with us today. so what's the bottom line from algeria t, as in bob way, folks in africa are busy building biotech hubs hosting innovation challenges and scaling their entrepreneurship across the continent. america is still there, but faintly, most of the fresh ink on the deals that will bring major economic development, or either chinese or russian or turkish. america still looks at the continent through archaic lenses, a poor war torn place, dependent on outsiders and in need of saving by the west, and more recently as a base for special forces and counter terrorism. sure, th

i mean, you know, we, we have u. s embassy that regularly during gay pride models. you know, flies, the, the game flag the, you know, we have u. s embassy is that toys murals of georgia, troy, a career criminal, and a lifelong young kid. so this is, you know, this is, this is an accidental issue. these are the values the united states seeks to explore. a very extreme ideology and it's totally alien to most people's of the world. yeah. and i am at the same time we have a lead in the west that are completely oblivious because they cannot see that there could be an alternative to bear a cult. it's very messy on our gentlemen, i'm going to company here. we're going to go to what you're breaking up with that jump right in your discussion. so ah, ah, a credit for collaboration graphic. what is the best i knew about them? this is a little bit of it said to listen to sort of the complexity of community with what i see school for car wouldn't support backwards. thank say me, i standing in my scheme importantly. got daughter destiny. i certainly don't love it. really. a condit

so, you know, that's gonna cause more of a supply problem, u. s. and raise prices, even more. prices are going up fast. the u. s. a. partly because the oil companies are shutting down to refineries. you know, they're not, they're having these a regular maintenance and, and there's the out so called fires and everything and not the real bottleneck is at the refining capacity. and that's been manipulated. i believe has nothing really different going on. except it's a good excuse to blame of the saudis and opec, instead of pointing the finger at the u. s. oil companies right before an election . a british politician prompted laughter from the audience on a t v program. after trying to play the vladimir putin card instead of simply apologizing for the economic timo coin caused by the u. k. government's recent tax cat announcement. what, what does that mean? if it wants to do, he wants to be divided right now. i think people alone would have to do with a simple apology to hardly say like, change the post. or of course, i'm sure the british government tax

so, you know, that's going to cause more of a supply problem. u. s. and raise prices, even more prices are going up fast, the u. s. a. partly because the oil companies are shutting down to refineries. you know, they're not, they're having these a regular maintenance and, and there's the so called fires and everything and the real bottleneck is at the refining capacity. and that's been manipulated. i believe there's nothing really different going on, except it's a good excuse to blame of the saudis and opec, instead of pointing the finger at the u. s. oil companies right before an election . meanwhile, energy has also been high on the agenda at any summit in prague. the box foreign policy teachers at burrell said the opec plus decision to slash oil production was a response to the new price cap, underlining that energy has become the main geopolitical issue. luca dale begged with their decision to decrease this reply, awful coil, which is a clear answer to our proposal to price. it means that energy is becoming the most important jew strategic issue tod

so, you know, that's going to cause more of a supply problem, u. s. and raise prices, even more. prices are going up faster. the u. s. a. partly because the oil companies are shutting down the refineries. you know, they're not, they're having these a regular maintenance and then there's the so called fires and everything and the real bottleneck is at the refining capacity. and that's been manipulated. i believe there's nothing really different going on, except it's a good excuse to blame of the saudis and opec. instead of pointing the finger at the u. s. oil companies right before an election. hey, british minister prompted laughter from the audience on a tv program out there trying to play the plug in a piercing card instead of apologizing for the economic time. of course, to find the government's $45000000000.00 pounds tax cuts. what does that mean? a futon wants to do. he wants to be divided right now. i think people, a lot thing has to do with a simple apology of our disable. all is already i changed the policy. of course i'm sure the british gover

u. s. that know all the people, the europe doesn't really know what's really behind what scary and why there's so much supports ah, for ukraine. but i mean, how long, how full, how about the whole, how much know can they, how much more can they put up with, i mean, with the cost of living rising cause an ammunition being promised to cave caused that weapons will this will, that will, that will just causally keep giving won't the people stand up and say, you know what, we need. these are some of these billions of dollars to help off today in our own home. or that's what the american people are certainly saying right now because of all of our internal strife, number one, but number 2, given the fact that there's an energy crisis, greatly low mean in europe, how are they gonna rather industries in order to produce more weapons? they're going to be relying on the united states, increasingly with the idea that us, we're back fill them as they continue to supply and our supplies a take years to rebuild. and we're not equipped or not. and i know the europeans, inadequate for a long war because they j

, i think van wolf, we know, for example, that the u. s. has to confirm each target, which is hit by how much rockets we know that did the u. s. and the britons, the grids are planning offenses of your credit, our together with the ukrainians and such and such an act of whatever terrible war how you call it. i would not have been done by keith without a support or at least knowledge of the western. the supporters in line with ukrainian officials repeated backtracking is also president zalinski himself who is actively back pedaling on his comments. calling for a preemptive nato stripe on russia, he claims he was simply misunderstood. and i said, you have to do preventive kinks. not a dex. yahoo! just goes out the show that amber g at the of multiple of those do a bruin excited through, but g a, there was a 0 in the trim, a do month improve days ago gabled it. poor jim wat amir zalinski and says he was just urging the west to impose more sanctions, claiming the kremlin is preparing society for the possible use of nuclear weapons. he added, h

u . s. are not allowed to do this unilateral and i know the u. s. does this all the time, but it has to be approved by the security council. it has not been approved by the security council. so indeed, it is illegal. the west tends to do what it was, regardless of international law, regardless of the evidence. and of course, a huge irony is, you know, the us and the you are giving billions of dollars of military assistance. do you cry any, they're big, grudging iran for at least allegedly giving military aid to russia. so again, the hypocrisy and the situation is pretty incredible. the economies of the west are collapsing and because of their own sanctions, isn't that the irony they have sanctioned themselves into oblivion. and now they want to engage in more sanctions. i made, you know, the definition of insanity is, you know, you keep trying the same thing and how for different responses, but they're going to get the same. the u. s. is warning the palestinian nationalist group home us. that's strengthening ties with serious government, with only r

the saudis and opec are doing globally, or, you know, negotiate to go on right now between us, well, companies and biden, about exporting oil from the u. s. to europe. so, you know, that's going to cause more of a supply problem, the u. s. and raise prices, even more. prices are going up fast. the u. s. a. partly because the oil companies are shutting down to refineries. no, they're not having these a regular maintenance. and then there's the so called fires and everything, and the real bottleneck is that the refining capacity. and that's been manipulated . i believe has nothing really different going on, except it's a good excuse to blame of the saudis and opec. instead of pointing the finger at the u. s. oil companies right before an election. meanwhile, energy has also been high on the agenda, add an ear summit in prague. the box foreign policy chief justice burrell said the opec was decision to slash oil production was a response to the new e u. price cap, underlining that energy has become the main geo political issue. luca dale begged with their decision to decrease this reply of coil, which is a clear answer to our proposal to pri

u. s. are not allowed to do this unilateral. i know the u. s. does this all the time, but it has to be approved by the security council. it has not been approved by the security council, though indeed, it is illegal. for clear, clear as day they go, black and why so both sides have denied the accusation. no proof was given yet have we have the use sloughing functions on iran? how's that possible? well, it's possible because, you know, the west tends to do what it was, regardless of international law, regardless of the evidence. and of course, the huge irony is, you know, the us and the you are giving billions of dollars of military assistance, see you cry. and yet they're big, grudging iran for at least allegedly giving military aid to russia. so again, the hypocrisy in this situation is pretty incredible. very, very indeed. the seems to be this sort of multi polar world coming into existence. do you think the facts and really work what should really be done to create harmony? well, the sanctions work to the extent that they cause great human su

you know, u. s. has given a $3000000000.00 a month just for its economy to keep it from collapsing. further, not including the military aid. can they keep doing that and fulfilled their plans to prepare for a china when you know a conflict with china in the future? 3 for 5 years now and cut social spending and not cut defense spending. i don't think they can do all 3 of those. i think what's gonna happen is you're going to clearly see that we're going to have a deficit of those significant proportions next year. and whether they can do that continue that spinning. and i think depends on what happens on the ground in ukraine in the next couple months. if the, you know, the ukrainian offensive continues is going to be hard for them to say, no, we're gonna cut, you know, our, our largest that we're giving you. but if there are some significant retreats, ah, you know, once russian comes on line with its reserves, and then it's going to be, is here for them to say, look, we're in all the can keep throwing

you know, the u. s. could consider, you know, some form of sanctions on the crown prince. i think that's unlikely, but that would be a threat down the road. and they certainly want to take some public step to demonstrate that the saudis cannot easily align with russia against the united states and europe. summing turbines, support base were unhappy with the outcome of his recent trip to the middle east. so he continues to be working on something a tight rope head does me? yes, he faces, especially among progressives. a lot of criticism. no, saudi arabia is a terrible regime when it comes to human rights. it's near the very bottom is rated by freedom. how's you compare it to other countries? it's actually worse than russia worse than iran, l. so from his standpoint, in the progressive standpoint, they want to see action. the president came in talking about human rights. he said that would be a touchstone of his administration. and progressives are now pointing at saudi arabia saying, we want action. okay, doc up on da, senior fellow at the cato institute to thanks for your

but there's also been talk of a possible army get that we've heard of it was, you know, the u. s. president was quoted or we over reacting to this or, or is it just being portrayed in the wrong way? what's your take? you know, when assessing a threatened national security domain, it's helpful to look at and adversaries intent and their capability. russia has the capability to conduct a nuclear attack. no doubt they have, according to 2018 nuclear posture review here in the united states. they have roughly 2000 and tactical nuclear weapons, so they absolutely have the capability to have the intent well to measure intent. you look at rhetoric and you look at actions, the rhetoric suggest that it could happen. but the department of fence hastened to add that we've seen nothing that was suggest that any sort of nuclear attack is eminent. yeah, we hope it stays that way. bradley bowman is always, we appreciate your time and your valuable insights. it's really important at this moment in history. thank you. thank you. ah, the only apparent purpose of this car in oil supplies is to help

u know iiss my we. it doesn't really matt where thbase is. as lg as we tr to s] not to bappreciave of beautul thing at surrod us.dcy but ifou reali what you he in thilife d how prious is the br, but ifou reali thwater th you dri, the muc and yo life.thilife and yo loved os d how prious is the br, arou you. th a]esn't he to hav i what'she purpo? self. everytng i've arnt abt perforng, aboumusic, [me block] don't thk yo-yo ming suretha. es himse as a ceist.e i think sees hielf as seone whoants tohange thworld, and hapns to ve cello wi him lf the te. and heants uto be llaborats with sentists, and beollaborars wi historis and ucators. ♪ [kinan i woullove it be contious. it's ne to see at it's new way thinkin about sic, abo what people c do togeer. [cristi cultur identit actuallshapes yo decisio all theime. and you n take tt as good allee [or bad onetur identit what imeansis eeriment,did ma d to keep ur identy aliv hav and r that itarted som thfestivalolin the as in galicianonnectioe it ithe festal where i t togeth tertraditiol artistwith gin whenou learnomethingfrom

i think they're not on the that did not, not on, you know, i think van wolf, we know, for example, that the u. s. has to confirm each target which is hit by harmless rockets. we know that did the u. s. and the britons, the brits are planning offenses of ukrainian army together with the ukrainians and such and such an act of whatever terrible war how you call it would not have been done by keith without a support or at least knowledge of the western, the supporters. let's cross live to dr. their son, a pearl coverage, head of the your asian studies center at the institute of international politics on day comics in belgrade. many thanks for joining on the program. it's nice to see. and so some of that at the north stream pipeline and crimea breach incidents are passive, new, sabotaged type take. so what do you make of that and a, well, some in the west celebrating damage to a civilian infrastructure. yes, without any deb to the season, the act of terrorism, and this is the 3rd, the narrow act of terrorism. the 1st was the destination of the dahlia davina, and the 2nd was as your mansion at the bla

know, we're printing money. we this is not a sound dream, it's not a sound program, but it is the program that the u. s. is embracing and it and it really is. it goes beyond corrupt and idiotic it. it actually becomes a little bit on the evil side. yep. you know, nickel, i mean, i don't want to be a history di tier, but you do remember the morgenthau plan for germany? there was a lot of d destro zation, you know i, i think that it's the morgenthau plan for the entire european continent now. well, it was i, but i forget, i think it was churchill who said the russians don't want war. they want the fruits of war today, we're talking about the same objective for the united states as the global head. you mon and i think again, put in is probably more correct and wrong in his analysis of world events. when he says this hedge amman is going to cling to power as long as it possibly can. it's not going to go off quietly into the night. it's going to be a violent effort to claw and hold on to power for as long as possible. well, i mean, nichol, i, i look at it this way, you look at the crew that's in the, by the m