u. s. is likely to focus on beijing asking all the guard members to stand with it against china. it is not clear whether it will be in complete agreement with the u. s. on china, india has a stand off the china for the last 3 years on the line of actual control. however, it has elected, do engage with the aging, to find a resolution to dialogue and to diplomacy. india participated in the bricks, meeting of foreign affairs ministers, where india asked china to live up to its commitments on sovereign equality and dated total integrity under law. given trend so far, it looks like india is going to maintain it. strategic partnerships with the western block. as well as the eastern block, instead of building the one or the other site. this is article for r t from new delhi. if you'd like to delve deeper into any of this, our stories to head all over to r t dot com, plenty of content to keep you informed. entertain. i mean, at least by for la, ah, who is the aggressor today? i'm authorizing the additional strong sanctions. today, russia is the country with the most sanctions imposed agai

u. s. on china, along not only japan, obviously, but also south korea on australia. what do you think these joints, russia, china exercises mean for security in the region on the balance of power? the as the power is going to stay exactly as it is now? i mean, i think that's what china and perhaps with the help is exercising their military flexing of their muscles in the south china sea and in the region is very much for the chinese. it's there. they see it is their right. it's their monroe doctrine . so to speak, americans are quite familiar with our view of the northern, not the gulf of mexico. of course we think of that is our area to operate to control. china feels the same way, i think for about the south china sea and other parts of the, you know, they, they are going to, demi china states going to if you think about it, you know, are we going to go in somebody's backyard and conduct a full scale global war, are we going to do that? i mean, because if we're planning to do that, that's one thing. but if we're just talking, then i think the status quo is china is

u. s. is likely to focus on beijing asking all the guard members to stand with it against china. it is not clear whether it will be in complete agreement with the u. s. on china. india has a stand off vit china for the last 3 years on the line of actual control. however, it has elected, do engage with the aging, to find a resolution to dialogue and through diplomacy. india participated in the bricks, meeting of foreign affairs ministers. their india asked china to live up to its commitments on sovereign equality and dated total integrity under law, given trench so far, it looks like india is going to maintain it. strategic partnerships with the western block, as well as the eastern block. instead of building the one or the other site, this is article far artie shaw new delhi. well that's how the world is looking for 30 am moscow tie? my name is peter scott on the back with more in about half an hour. see you then. thank you. lou. lisa hunter, russian state will never. i've stayed on the most landscape div us. mm hm. then the king also samson, me could been 55 when a kid on and he'

u. s. is likely to focus on beijing, asking all the guard members to stand with it against china. it is not clear whether it will be in complete agreement with the u. s. on china. india has a stand off vit china for the last 3 years on the line of actual control. however, it has elected to engage with the aging, to find a resolution to dialogue and through diplomacy. india participated in the bricks, meeting of foreign affairs ministers, where india asked china to live up to its commitments on sovereign equality and territorial integrity under law. given the trend so far, it looks like india is going to maintain it. strategic partnerships with the western block. as well as the eastern rock, instead of thinking to run the other site. this is article far from new delhi. meanwhile, it seems nobody is also trying to cooperate against beijing economically in the region. that, that he agreed new tre deal with 12 indo pacific nations boards excluding china, the biggest economy, the boats, criticism is mounting against the deal with some thing is crating on wants of divisions in the region

u. s. is likely to focus on beijing, asking all the guard members to stand with against china. it is not clear whether it will be in complete agreement with the u. s. on china. india has a stand off vit china for the last 3 years on the line of actual control. however, it has elected to engage with the aging, to find a resolution to dialogue and through diplomacy. india participated in the bricks, meeting of foreign affairs ministers, where india asked china to live up to its commitments on sovereign equality and dated audial integrity under law, given trench so far, it looks like india is going to maintain it. strategic partnerships with the western block. as well as the eastern block, instead of building to one or the other site. this is article far artie from new delhi. well, thanks for joining us, does it for now my name is peter scott. on the be back again. we mon use in about 30 minutes time. thank you. ah.

on education altogether. ah. i'm british manager. welcome to the dublin news asia. glad you could join us. china's deadliest aviation disaster in decades could have been deliberate on media report. starting u. s. official says the march crash of china eastern flight m u 5735. could have been caused by court, some one in the cockpit. u. s. officials are helping analyze the flights data recorder and cockpit voice recorder. the new assessment is based on information from the state up. a 132 people lost their lives. after the boeing 737800 plunged vertically into a mountain side in southern china. this video, unverified, but widely shared on social media, allegedly shows the final moments of flight m, u 5735. on march 21st. soon afterward, cruise began retrieving that every each piece a potential clue into what caused the deadly disaster. now there are indications that the crush might have been deliberate. data from the black box, reportedly shows someone had sent a plane into a fatal nose dive. this, according to the wall street journal, which cited people familiar with the preliminary assessment of u. s. officials. the u. s. took parting investigations since the aircraft was manufactured there.

taiwan being invaded by china that he was kind of ending, that policy of strategic ambiguity wasn't well, at least lincoln said yesterday, you know, the u. s. it hears to the one china policy, the u. s. it hears to the standards that have guided us policy towards the people's republic and towards taiwan. the u. s. does not favor a independence of taiwan. it again was attempting, i think, to lower the temperature by the says, a lot of things. this is one thing that we've seen. i don't know whether these are gaps or, you know, he really wants to express your what exactly they mean, but they are, it's not a good way to conduct foreign policy. i know i've been reading the article that you've been writing recently about the russian invasion of ukraine. you've suggested a path to peace that that could include a guarantee from nato, of, of no expansion these of the ukraine. does that translate into u. s. policy on taiwan these of the china in any way. well ok, we could have avoided this war altogether in my view because pollutant has been saying for years, we need to discuss the security arrangements. nato is moving into the black sea region surrounding us. not only

taiwan being invaded by china that he was kind of ending, that policy of strategic ambiguity wasn't well, at least lincoln said yesterday, you know, the u. s. it hears to the one china policy, the u. s. it hears to the standards that have guided us policy towards the people's republic and towards taiwan. the u. s. does not favor a independence of taiwan. it again was attempting, i think, to lower the temperature by the says, a lot of things. this is one thing that we've seen. i don't know whether these are gaps or, you know, he really wants to express your what exactly they mean, but they are, it's not a good way to conduct foreign policy. i know i've been reading the article that you've been writing recently about the russian invasion of ukraine. and you know, you've suggested a path to peace that that could include a guarantee from nato, of, of no expansion these of the ukraine does that translate into u. s. policy on taiwan. these of the china in any way. well, okay, we could have avoided this war altogether in my view because pollutant has been saying for years, we need to discuss the security arrangements. nato is moving into the black sea region surround

one of you have to understand we defending you personally. ah, also coming up for decades, the u. s. policy on taiwan in china was known as strategic ambiguity. tonight, new comments from u. s. president biden. that are anything but ambiguous? are you willing to get involved militarily to defend taiwan if it comes to that? yes, you are. that's a commitment we made ah, to our viewers watching on p b. s in the united states and to all of you around the world. welcome. we begin the day with the business of war and peace to day ukraine's president vladimir zalinski accused global business and financial leaders of not doing enough to stop russia's war in his country. to morrow will mark 3 months since vladimir putin forces began their invasion of ukraine. on the eve of that anniversary, zalinski made a passionate plea to leaders attending the world economic forum in switzerland, calling on them to increase economic sanctions against russia, including an oil embargo and to sever all trade ties with russia. zalinski, adding that an example must be made of futons aggression in order to deter copycat attacks by other

china. thank you for your time today. joe biden said the u. s. is ready to intervene militarily, if china decided to attack taiwan, how much this contradict the one china policy, but the u. s. recognizes as were no other 3rd, the united states is always tried to contract or explain different ways about the one. china policy has window or mendham or the years ago how center before that the, you know, this face has already announced the greed, the basic code in there, one china policy. and also there you are not nations, the resolution 2758 also has clearly got that declared that that there weren't trying our policy. but the reason the years we found that there are some america official always try to contradict the problem is and also try to miss your interpretation. hope to turn a policy and especially the center drawer and that than yours. she goes to the one official on special for those separate to towering child to be independent of the island of mainland. so this is a very dangerous action taken by their state. of course we find out that the white house later or try to catch some paper in the clarity. sometimes we know that a similar situatio

on the potential threat from china. a key issue is the security of taiwan and t r. one is also the subject of one of the u. s. press. one of us president jo biden's famous unscripted remarks biden told reporters at the quad summit in tokyo that he would use force to defend taiwan from any attack by china. not surprisingly by jing was quick to hit back. ah, president biden was welcomed with full honors for his 1st business head of state to japan. the united states most important posts, were ally in asia, talks of prime minister for mucus. she does focused on regional security, amid china's growing power. in the aftermath of russia's invasion of its neighbor, ukraine, the issue of possible chinese aggression against taiwan has taken on greater urgency for at a news conference, president biden was asked how the u. s. would respond. are you willing to get involved militarily to defend taiwan? if it comes to that, yes, you are. that's a commitment we made reaction from beijing was swift to help him if on the yellow we deplore and reject the u. s. remarks. have actually tie one is a unique part of chinese territory and i o

the south china has warned the us not to underestimate beijing's resolve on taiwan. u. s. president joe biden says that he'll intervene militarily. if china tries to invade taiwan, he was asked during an official visit to japan, beijing regards taiwan as a breakaway territory. russian soldiers, a clearing mines of the as of style still works. after the surrender of ukrainian troops, they will hold up for weeks in the industrial area, making a last stand against washing forces who captured the west of mariel. as ukraine's president full of them is lensky is set to address the world economic forum. this was town of davos. russia's invasion tops the agenda for the gathering of business and diplomatic elite, iran's president his vine, to avenge the killing of a city a revolution regards. officer and to ron gunmen on 2 motorcycles shot dead cuddle. hassan, sad huddle ye. in his car outside his home, the attackers are still at large. peggy d. j. d. i emphasize the serious pursuit of secure 2 officials into the killing of the coronel and i have no doubt the revenge for the blood

and china has warmed the us not to under estimate beijing's resolve on taiwan. u. s. president joe biden says that he intervene militarily. if china tries to invade taiwan, he was ostrich, an official visit to japan, beijing regards taiwan as a break away territory. let's get all of their stuff from officers. katrina, you his life for us in beijing. what more is china been saying about this? katrina whoa, for china. taiwan is a red line issue. and on monday terms, foreign ministry responded angrily to biden's comments. saying that taiwan is an a leader we'll part of china's territory president. she didn't bring as a time and time again that the self ruled island will be united, reared beijing peacefully, all by force if necessary. so monday, china's foreign ministry spokesperson won when been said that there would be no concessions, nor compromise on this magic. and he was the u. s. not to stand against china as 1400000000 people. he said they would be some actions taken. although he did not specify what these would be, he also urged the us to walk back or still any

u. s is relationship with china, you had president biden in his recent comments on taiwan. those comments angered beijing on tuesday. you said that the u. s. would respond militarily, if the island was attacked, the white house later walked back those comments. but how much has that upset paging? well, i mean, well, you know, cause this year reza might have been talking on quite a few times. and every time driven by it is, you know, we, we respect china on the 6th allies against china. we were really, we were a big by one china policy, but every time that's why he's on to other people. he sounds different so, so that's really, you know, made china kind of difficult to understand. but also i think that your great thing is really sort of minor to the people of all the, the nato us rossi, which i know because you see why one, sorry, d and terms are in term is why that's really the cause of international condemnation and, and criticism, i mean highways recognized by 16070 countries of china. that's the conditional is done. the diplomatic ties was done. is paulo john. so john nat

on us. and it was just an, in felicitous expression of what white house officials had reiterated that there is no change in the u. s. is one china policy because the question, if you listen carefully, the question that was asked was, would the u. s. intervene militarily and we can interpret this perhaps a little bit of a legalistic interpretation, but not deploying military forces, but perhaps sticking to the taiwan relations act, providing defensive equipment to time. now the danger we run into here is that if there is indeed a challenge that we have to remember, that this notion of strategic ambiguity was not meant for train as it was actually led to protect us. because if the u. s gave a secure, in guarantee to taiwan. it could very well end up in the situation of the tail wagging the dog. meaning that this would invoke the title, drag the us into a conflict, and to use, to paraphrase something from the movie rocky stories, sylvester stallone. you know, we have to be careful here as the you, as president by writing a check that the u. s. can't cash, and that this is the danger that it could lead to needless escalation and a h

on this. and it was just an expression of what the white house officials had reiterated that there is no change in the u. s. is one china policy because the question, if you listen carefully, the question that was asked was, would the u. s. intervene militarily and we can interpret this perhaps a little bit of a legalistic interpretation, but not deploying military forces, but perhaps sticking to the taiwan relations act, providing defensive equipment to time could be considered a military intervention. now of course, if we see it as a deviation from this long standing policy, this would be very provocative and very, very dangerous. so i mean, white house officials then attempt to clarify the u. s. position. so in reality, is there any change to the u. s. pitch no, the taiwan. well again, i think it really depends how we interpret president biden's response that yes, the us would intervene militarily. now that means following the requirements of the taiwan relations act, then it would not, of course, be shipped. now the danger we run into here is that if there is indeed a church that we have to remember that this notion

u. s. has placed on russia, china, iran, venezuela, and many other countries. despite the ramp and inflation, the u. s is set to pass its largest ukraine aid package yet on wednesday to send a total of $40000000000.00 to kiff. but the list of lawmakers opposed to further aid to ukraine is growing. 2 months ago, 3 republicans in the house of representatives voted against the 1st pro ukraine bill. whereas on tuesday, 57 republicans in the house opposed a request for weapons and humanitarian aid for if. meanwhile, senate minority leader, mitch mcconnell has criticized fellow republicans opposing the aid as quote, isolationist voices. but democratic candidate jeffrey young again also thinks that such an amount of military aid could be harmful. it's a disaster it's. it's completely wrong and damaging. and if i had been in the us house of representatives, i would have been the only democrat to vote no. there's no way that this military aid can help defeat russia. that's impossible. it will only either be destroyed by russian missiles or fall into the hands of ukrainian. nazis rising tensions betwe

u. s. lead framework already belong to the block with china on. meanwhile, beijing has criticized the u. s. pack does an attempt to create a closed club. this is what the chinese foreign ministry of spokesperson had to say . you lose your mom, you would die cheerful. talk joe, to whatever the name of the regional cooperation framework it should promote free trade instead of engaging in protectionism in disguise. it should contribute to the world's economic recovery rather than destabilizing the industrial chain. it should promote open cooperation garden instead of geopolitical confrontation with the u. s . should earnestly act in compliance with the rules of free trade 3. now, biden has also held a summit with the so called quad group, where the leaders of the u. s. and japan, india, and a straightly unveils and in the pacific maritime surveillance plan and pledged $50000000000.00 an infrastructure investment. now to discuss all of that, i'm joined by n press to see the se, asia experts and associates director at global council. that's the strategic advisory business fun. he joins us now

u. s. long standing one china policy or its attitude towards taiwan? no, he's had to repeat a constantly throughout the day of various photo opportunities and sprays as they call them and being thrown this question from reporters. but it does seem to have been something that he has been tried to answer and trying to correct for most of this most important of the 2 days the summit day itself. and it does a lead to china believing that all of this really was at sat out from the very beginning as being a bit of china bashing that this was china's adversaries in this part of the world ganging up and trying to stop it, develop in what it regards as its own backyard up thanks very much meant by wrapping up all the lines there from that quad meeting into again. now clauses amier has called for journalists lives to be respected, no matter where they come from. shakes her name, been hammered. al fanny was speaking at the world economic forum. instead of off out 0 journalist, serene abil, aclu was fatally shot by israeli forces was on assignment. on at the 11th

u. s. lead order. now, bating has also mentioned the importance of taiwan, saying that this is really the cornerstone of the china u. s. relationship. and he said that while washington says on paper, it does abide by the one china policy. he again accused washington of double speak saying its words and actions simply demonstrates otherwise. now this speech has taken place at a time when china's foreign minister, one years currently on a marathon regional tool of the south pacific, which is quickly shaping up to be in use fear of rivalry between washington in beijing. a one he is due to visitors, 7 other countries after the solomon islands were china has signed a security pack that the government of hon yara. and it's hoping to replicate that with at least 9 other nations in the south pacific. but the has already been pushed back against china's vi for more influence in that region. with the g. a, a not a saying whether it's going to join the security or economic trade back with china . but instead, signing up for the international, the engine indoor pacific economic framework, which has just been announced by jer, biden a few days earlier. katrina, thank you for that. katri

u. s. and china on a collision course, or is it possible that they're going to find a way to work with each other? i think his speech is trying is true. and boy, the 2 countries getting on the coalition, coal. but this speech will be seen in beijing as hypocritical, and be ruling that the fight and administration is taking a coal mentality to deal with a problem. in spite of entity, blank and saying exactly the opposite. have chinese actions in the south china sea reinforced the concerns about whether china is ready to abide by the international order by the 2019 i c j ruling against the chinese position in the area. well, i think the example you cited over the south china sea marine town dispute confirms what i said earlier that the chinese government thinks that we would what it saying is about the south china sea piece reasonable. and the south pole create is the i she is taking side and being unreasonable and therefore they do not accept and it will not accept it. what they do is against international law. all right, thank you so much for sharing of perspective, steve stang. i'm fighter

u. s. policy of strategic ambiguity on taiwan. saying the u. s. would take military action if china invaded the white house later, roll back the statements. but there is clearly stronger us backing for taiwan. china's leader, she, jim ping has threatened to take the island by force if necessary. beijing says it's recent exercises around taiwan, where a solemn warning against colluding with the united states has cross straight rivalry moves closer to the danger zone. robin sou will be watching and if you'd like to watch a deeper analysis of the chinese threat to taiwan, you can head over to our youtube channel to watch taiwan. china's next target did i lose. chief international editor richard walker takes a closer look at the evolving danger from china towards taiwan. now taiwan has also served as a safe haven for some hong kong is fleeing begging security, correct on many activists, politicians and protested, have fled to the island for the most part. they were welcomed there and there were even plans to make it easier for hong kong. to become permanent residence even citizens. but

u. s. japan and india for regional security talks in tokyo, the so called quad countries are focusing on the potential threat from china. the key issue is the security of taiwan. l. u. s. present, joe biden has said washington's decades long stance toward taiwan, remains unchanged. biden's clarification comes a day after he told reporters at the quad summit unto care that he would use force to defend taiwan from any attack by china. china regards democratic island as part of its territory. beijing was quick to hit back. president biden was welcomed with full honors for his 1st visit as head of state to japan, the united states most important post war ally in asia, talks of prime minister for mucus. she does focused on regional security a mid, china's growing power in the aftermath of russia's invasion of its neighbor ukraine . the issue of possible chinese aggression against taiwan has taken on greater urgency for at a news conference, president biden was asked how the u. s. would respond, are you willing to get involved militarily to defend taiwan if it comes to that? yes, you are. as a commitment, we made a reaction

on the list, lucia kin believes the u. s. has always been a big us on the one china policy. 3rd, the united states is always trying to contradict or explain different ways above the one. china policy has where those are many, many years ago, how center before that the united states has already announced the greed, the basic code. is there one china policy? and also there you are not nations, the resolution to out in the $758.00 also has clearly declared that there weren't try not policy. but the reason the years we found that there are some america official always try to contradict or it's a problem miss. and also try to miss your interpretation of the one turn of policy and i think the pigeons are rick, the comments are used quite normal because it is a reflection, the principal idea of the whole nation. so we should say that or try and us government has already announced that again. and again, that was kind of policy is the main stone and the base stone that the between all countries who are ready to have people, american religion, we're trying to move relations. w

u. s. dance on taiwan has been far more ambiguous in the past. and the white house immediately had to release a statement, trying to clarify the u. s. position. but what sounded like a threat to china brought this response. hello, monkey, crucial the taiwan issue of purely china, the internal affair, which won't stand for any foreign interference issues bearing on china's co interests, including the serenity and territorial integrity that is normal for compromise or concession. no one should underestimate the chinese people's firm resolution. this has turned into something of a distraction in what is meant to be a strong show of unity against russian aggression. and also against increasing military threats from china. as well as increased missile testing from north korea . as the only nation to have been subjected to an atomic attack, japan is deeply concerned by north korea's development of its nuclear arsenal. but it's also troubled by the increasing assertiveness of china with ongoing territorial disputes in the east china sea. yardi title touched it as a major power. china has significant responsibilities, also in the economic field to live up to that responsibility. i think it