u. s. r state department. and also has long term ties with george soros had essentially in 2021 pressure to it, to, to delete some 40000 or the gallons from their back form. and these accounts were all members of the par fusion ballpark in india, margins of our g or the b b as essentially the political party of indian prime minister, not in the movie. now important to mention george soros here, as he said, to be the man, the fees behind repeated regime change attempts in india. and remember, in the us do for a general election next hour in 2024. now math dive, even john, and this essentially a behind twitter files of exposing to devised really also disclose that the ben security and trust chief off twitter. i'll essentially had examined most of these accounts, these 40000 accounts here that we're talking about. and all of them appeared to be real people at linda council's digital forensic research lab said the suspected $40000.00 accounts of being paid employees or possibly volunteers of india's party . i do n

u. s. sexier states on snape lincoln whether the p r c is said to you or to anybody that works. the state department, any of our diplomats that there are some sort of red line involved with us stepping up our formal turf now? no one to the stuff they've ever tried to. anything like that of that's not something that we would obviously take into account. the comments come, i'm in a cooling in relations between washington and basing the u. s. previously warning repeatedly about it's red lines, but assuming they failed to see or even acknowledge the red lines of us. if there are any thoughts and an efforts by the chinese and others to provide lethal support to the russians and their brutal attack against ukraine, that that is unacceptable. again, that would be a red line. what i want to do with him when we talk is lay out what the, what, what kind of what each of our read lines are understand what he believes to be in the critical national interest of china. what i know to be the critical, interesting united states and determine whether or not they conflict with one another. we cannot have a situation w

r u. s. intelligence had surmised that a was a ukranian resistance group. however, both state department and the national security council. oh, refuse to confirm or even demise. this report, no discussion whatsoever about it. so as yet this report is entirely unsubstantiated. apart from those are named an an identified sources. thousands of protesters have rallied and george's capital tbilisi against a controversial so called foreign agents. spill. protesters are worried it could impact the hopes of joining the european union. george as president intends to veto the law to for americans who were kidnapped and mexico and friday have been found dead to others have been released and are being treated at a u. s. hospital the group was abducted by armed men while driving into the city. if not tomatoes. 3 candidates competing to succeed. nicholas sturgeon, as scotland 1st minister, hell their 1st televised debate attacked each other over their roles in government exchanges were dominated by social and economic ashes. and scottish independence. the u. k. government has unveiled a bill aimed at

u. s. secretary states antony buncombe whether the p r c is said to you or to anybody that works. the state department. any of our diplomats that there are some sort of red line involved with us stepping up our foreign military for now? no one to the cynthia. ever tried to say anything like, like that of, that's not something that we would obviously take into account or despite washington wanting about its own red lines. it's seemly bruce, off beijing's consent to provide lethal support to the russians and their brutal attack against ukraine that that is unacceptable. again, that would be a red line. what i want to do with him when we talk is lay out what the what, what kind of what each of our red lines are or redwine for us is we start saying a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around for being utilized. the lady a we spoke to also journalists and activists, thomas fuzzy, who says that the u. s. is approach is out of date on washington's had gemini, is being confronted by other powers. it just shows how delusional the u. s. has become the u. s. seems to think that it's still lives in the well o

u. s. secretary of states on state blinked weather the p r c is said to you or to anybody that works the state department, any of our diplomats that there was some sort of red line involved with us stepping up our formal turf. now? no one to the cynthia ever tried to say anything like that of that's not something that we would obviously take into account. well, the comments come amid a cooling in relations between washington and beijing. according to the one china policy, washington should only recognise and deal with beijing and abstain from formal corporation, which i won for washington keeps crossing china's red lines by supporting sy, ones independence. but the u. s. has repeatedly warned about it's red lines. it is seemingly failed, so acknowledged those of china if there are any thoughts and an efforts by the chinese and others to provide lethal support to the russians and their brutal attack against ukraine, that that is unacceptable. again, that would be a red line. what i want to do with him when we talk is lay out what the, what kind of what each of our red lines are understand what he believes

u. s. de secretary and the blanket in response to a grilling by american sentences. whether the p r c is said to you or to anybody that works the state department, any of our diplomats that there are some sort of red line involved with us stepping up our foreign military for no one to the extent they've ever tried to anything like that, that's not something that we would obviously take into account while washington has brushed off beijing's red lines. u. s. officials have long tried to draw such lines if that to provide lethal support to the russians and their brutal attack against ukraine that, that is unacceptable. again, that, that would be a red line. what i want to do with him when we talk is lay out what, what, what kind of what each of our red lines are. a red line for us is we start saying a whole bunch of chemical weapons moving around for being utilized. will off a journalist and act of as thomas fuzzy say, c u s. approach is obsolete is washington and germany is being confronted by other major house. it just shows how delusional the u. s. has become the u. s. seems to think that it still lives in the a well of the ninety's as well to

r i of the pre they were nothing but stooges and lackeys of u. s. foreign policy in u. s. interests. so certainly almost tone, i think, comes as a surprise to the state department in the not quite sure what to make of it. a representatives of the state department have had the usual and just rhetoric saying that they respect mexican sovereignty. but if we examine u. s. foreign policy, although all the way back to 1848 with the theft of one 3rd of what was mexico. we should remember the california nevada, arizona, utah, colorado, texas. all of this land belonged to the indigenous people. in fact, the entire divided snakes of america. and i'm low in the mexican people, do not forget this representatives of so many sovereign governments from olivia to brazil to venezuela, to cuba. now in mexico are saying that we will not accept this arrogant posture of monroe isn't. that defines all of south american, the caribbean, as the backyard of the united states. so this is very welcome news that i'm low standing up in this way. cisco has issued a report and russia is unlikely to be involved in the so called havana syndrome. incidence, which american diplomats in cuba devel

r i of the pre they were nothing but stooges and lackeys of u. s. foreign policy in u. s. interests. so certainly, i'm lose tone. i think comes as a surprise to the state department and they're not quite sure what to make of it. representatives of the state department have had the usual rhetoric saying that they respect mexican sovereignty. but if we examine u. s. foreign policy all the way back to 1848. with the theft of one 3rd of what was mexico. we should remember that california nevada, arizona, utah, colorado, texas. all of this land belonged to the indigenous people. in fact, entire divided sneaks of america and arm law in the mexican people do not forget this representatives of so many sovereign governments from olivia to brazil to venezuela, to cuba. now in mexico are saying that we will not accept this arrogant posture of monroe. isn't that defines all of south american, the caribbean, as the backyard of the united states. so this is very welcome news that i'm low standing up in this way. let's go back to our breaking news for you here on our team to national from rushers brianna region. it's right along the ukrainian border . you can see it on the map.

r i of the pre they were nothing but stooges and lackeys of u. s. foreign policy and u. s. interests. so certainly, i'm those tone i think comes as a surprise to the state department in the not quite sure what to make of it. a representatives of the state department have had the usual and rhetoric saying that they respect mexican sovereignty. but if we examine u. s. foreign policy all the way back to 1848. with the theft of one 3rd of what was mexico, we should remember the california nevada, arizona, utah, colorado, texas. all of this land belonged to the indigenous people. in fact, the entire divided snakes of america and arm low in the mexican people do not forget this representatives of so many sovereign governments from olivia to brazil to venezuela, to cuba. now, in mexico are saying that we will not accept this arrogant posture of monroe isn't. that defines all of south american, the caribbean is the backyard of the united states. so this is very welcome news that i'm lower standing up in this way. yes, the i has said the virus that calls the cove, it was most likely lead for the time is laboratory. now, us officials and seeking to extract pandemic costs fr