u. s. really. what is it brought to places like africa in the middle east in recent years, war and destruction? you know, and so yeah, the world is getting bigger. we now see him all type, pale polar world and bloom and places like african are taking advantage of that. should russia doesn't have a colonial passed on the continent, unlike many of the others who are criticizing moscow for, for this very trip right now does not make a difference for how they can build relations from here. the fact that there is no colonial baggage with moscow, this will be union back in the 1950s, did support all pollutions against lonia powers in the middle east and africa. the african countries and country made the eastern engender, believe that russia is a genuine ally. it doesn't lectures the world and the african countries how to adopt, what didn't back in the market in the us wants what it's always wanted out of africa, a monopoly over africa's resources. right. and they want to have ultimate military penetratio

u. s. really, what is it brought to places like africa in the middle east? you know, in recent years war and destruction, you know, and so yeah, the world is getting bigger. we now see him all type, pale polar world and bloom and places like african are taking advantage of that is they should my good back to you. what significance does collaboration between african countries and russia for the region. and i want to just point, i think it's a significant one. russia doesn't have a colonial passed on the continent, unlike many of the others who are criticizing moscow for, for this very trip right now. does that make a difference for how they can build relations from here? the fact that there's no colonial baggage with moscow. if you go back to the route, you will find that the soviet union back in the 1950s, did support all pollutions against colonial powers in the middle east and africa. so 2 africans, and in the east, russia, which is the end of the soviet union. the legitimate union was a friend. i mean, let's put it this way, a friend of them at the soviet

u. s. really, you know, carol quigley wrote the book, the anglo american strat establishment decades ago because it was a soft, it was an indirect argument. the at the u. s. and a dovetail back under empire and all but name as certainly as early as the 1913 federal reserve act. so the belligerence is really begging the question over the stakes. why this severe rousseau phobia? it's because of what we're talking about earlier. a very potent, very well thought out very well coordinated. a challenge against dollar had gemini, against super imperialism, to quote a professor hudson's earlier text work against petro dollar head gemini, which we have to remember in $197374.00, went into when it became a plan in large part b, on the assumption of a u. s. military dom. and so if anybody falls at a line, we whack them back into gear that worked for saddam hussein's iraq that worked for a colonel could off ease libya. it's not going to work against the massive nuclear powers that just aside from that level o

u. s really, you know, carol quigley wrote the book, the anglo american strat establishment decades ago because it was a soft, it was an indirect argument the that the u. s. and a dovetail back under empire and all but name as certainly as early as the 1913 federal reserve act. so the belligerence is really begging the question over the stakes. why this severe rousseau phobia? it's because of what we're talking about earlier. a very potent, very well thought out very well coordinated. a challenge against dollar had gemini, against super imperialism, to quote, professor hudson's earlier text work against petro dollar head gemini, which we have to remember. 197374, went into went and became a plan in large part bay on the assumption of a u. s. military dom. and so if anybody falls at a line, we whack them back into gear that worked for saddam hussein's iraq that worked for a colonel gadhafi libya. it's not going to work against the massive nuclear powers that just aside from that level of a deterrence capability and collectively have a military force numbering in the 10s of millions where

u. s. really only gave one can concession, right? when they said that it was likely responsible, israel was likely responsible with this in mind. i mean, what do you, what do you find is so problematic about statement? and what does it reveal to us about the us role? it reveals that the us would always stand by israel, even if the crimes committed by these weighty forces are being committed against an american citizen. it also reveals that they are so fixated on the issue of the bullet of the contradicting all the prestigious media outlets that have been conducting their own investigations. saying that it was clear that there was no palestinian shooting at the time when shooting was killed. so for palestinians, it seeing here as a broad, as a way for the us to show that it's going and currently doing an investigation and coming out with the result. but really that justice is not going to be, sir. not for sure. read enough for many, many palestinians were killed by israeli forces before city and are still being killed after her. and i

u. s. government. it's really, it shouldn't come as much of a surprise that a lot of african countries in asian countries are weary about being connected with the united states, especially when the united states is trying to get them on the anti russian sanctions bandwagon. i mean, they're, they're leaders see what happens when american influence is tolerated, and countries, and then the authorities there make one wrong move that washington doesn't like. an let me just bring you back a few years don't, than my don uprising of 2014 in ukraine. will that no be considered a crew by the west as well? well, that's possibly the case. i mean, back when it took place back in 2014, many people saw it as a qu data back then as well. i mean, it's no secret that the former under secretary of european affairs victoria newland and cooperation with the former us ambassador to ukraine at the time in 2014. they did all they could to guide the ukrainians, the ukrainian opposition movement, where they wanted it to go. and this is on

u. s . views its dealings with other people around the world. i mean these recent statements by these top u. s. officials should really be one heck of a wake up call. well, it's a pleasure to welcome live on to the program. now if former cia analyst raymond mcgovern, for his take on those developments, good to see you re what was your reaction to bolton's admission publicly admitting that the u. s. organized coups abroad? well, this should be a shocker to no one. ah, bolton is trying to sell his book. and bolton is a mag gala maniac with an accent on the maniac. no. equal accents on the mega mccalla and maniac, he is one of the people that george h. w. butch, who happened to be a friend of mine called the crazy sh. and i have that in writing from that then vice president. so what bolton is trying to do is seized the limelight. you'll notice he always wears his yell ring and 6. it well, not up as nose, but all was on his cheek so that we can know that john bolton went to yale. he's a menace. and when people describe me as a ca, official, i always say i was a c i, a analysts because ensure there are 2 c a's. there's one

u. s. still really relies on fossil fuel power plants. they make up about a 4th of us greenhouse gas emissions. so the ability to rein in that production is very important to president by the climate plans and his ability to use a get executive power has been key so severely restricting the ability of the e p. a here to act is going to be a big blow to president biden, and his attempts to make progress on global warming. and this all comes, i should say, as the countries witnessing devastating weather patterns that scientists attribute to global warming. things like massive heat waves, a droughts, wildfires, and flooding, and the disappointment can be sense beyond the u. s. as well. the united nations are saying today in a statement that it doesn't provide commentary on issues in individual member states, but said quote, we can say that this is a setback in our fight against climate change. when we are already far off track of meeting the goals of the paris agreement, so blow a generally to global efforts to curve global warming. so me so

really build that. and that ultimately threatens wall street. it's in the u. s. military had gemini, and it's the nato's overarching, a global dominance. so it's very much a nerve wracking for the ellipse in washington. and in the new york city in brussels, in vienna, in geneva. and the sad part is that the biden's trip to the middle east, that the 1st one in this presidency was marked by a strong and iran sentiment. and that was both in israel and also in saudi arabia. and we have to realize that this is judith l'm declaration that bite and same with israeli authorities. it really, it really is, is quite shocking because they're still leaving this military option, the table and the really they have iran as it i get. so i think very, very much this is a dangerous situation, and the iranian government is correct. it is under phobic. they are spreading it all over the region. biden's sabre rattling comes as the us president has failed to win an immediate oil output increase and original security alliance at the arab summit. now with more on how biden's middle east

u. s. a gemini really has affect any more. and i'm at least, you know, it was really basically a non event. you know, we live in a new, well, a multi polar well, where by russia, china, india, turkey and a few others are forming a blog and alliance in the world is growing exponentially. and which is going to be a much, much bigger power in the world than america ever was. is a transition going on a u. s. a gemini hasn't really played much role in the middle east for the last 5 or 6 years. and you can see that it's changing how the whole the whole arena is changing. now, in the aftermath of biden's controversial trip to the middle east terran has slammed his policy in the region, accusing the u. s. of spreading iran a phobic sentiments. the u. s. is once more trying to create tensions and crises across the region through relying on the failed policy of iran, a phobia, a joint statement released after biden's trip to israel emphasize us lead efforts to prevent her on from building a nuclear bomb. biden has asserted the u. s. cou

u. s. really wants to talk about the importance of convince, sir, not only the israelis but the saudis, that the iran nuclear deal is still a valuable tool to be revived. but a, in these meetings that took place last month and cutter, for example, the united states was unable to get any concessions from iran. so once again, it's just showing as the u. s, it comes to this region that is not really able to achieve the great things that it may be what had been able to promise in the past. so that is one of the problems. and the other big issue is that we see iran also in its growing ties with china, with russia and sort of flexing its might. and so this is a real crisis for the united states right now. and a, it's one that has been complicated, of course, by the war i'm the brushes invasion of ukraine, the energy crisis. it's complicated, and joe biden is under enormous pressure. i think what you could say in all of this is that this is a high stakes visit, not just internationally, but also domestic

u. s. is really not going to benefit from and stability in the middle east. as we know, if your prices are a more instability in the middle east, would even make that worse. not just for the us, but for the international community as well. so we had, we see a behavior of ease supported by the u as impacting the international community and countries around the globe bo and say you were able to handle the trip to south. john failed to do right by the people are going to say to the people that are taking need to install because we need just. c to be doing stuff. this is not only for us, it's for the next generation who is coming up and you can see how, how long we are suffering for the oil and gas and the, you know, all did everything is don't know, right? so even some people are losing their job income, what are the company i getting? it's working off right? everything is going high, the prices are high, so we need no solution. the clock is ticking while we await the feet of the current government and the future direction of the entire country. ruins sharma rep

u. s. he really has the upper hand in this need to dynamics. and this is letting you basically because for years, europe as well, needed him as a bouncer to keep refugees out of europe. but we have really reached a stage, i would say that you could call a black black meeting. you know, we are really in the hands of president outline, which is a dangerous development because he feels he can go ahead with another military intervention in that region that would, that will cause mass displacement occupation for the injustice and social unrest in northern syria region that has already been hit by indicate of war and terror and hardship. thank you very much, middle east analyst, kristen hubbard. thank you. turner, to have a look at some of the other stories making headlines today. china has placed 1700000 people under locked down in the central and we province after 300 cove at 19 cases were reported leaving streets deserted and empty. the 0 covert policy, which imposes strict isolation measures in an effort to fully eradicate the virus, means people

u. s. sales. obama just serves the only purpose of viewing the pages more. and i think people in the world should really see what the united states is up to. it's talking about one talk, but it's walking about the other walk. it's completely contradictory. and i think the u. s. strategic ambiguity is really misleading the american people. it's misleading its allies to the west. it's misleading everyone else in the world. the united states is the major source of tension in the cross power st relations. it's been suggested that taiwan wouldn't be seeking so many weapon shipments if they didn't feel threatened by beijing. has china been overly aggressive towards ty pay recently? well, 1st of all, the situation in the prostrate relations is really hadn't over of the finished civil war in 1949. and ever since 1949 when the people's republic of china was found, it's a, china's mission is to achieve nice know, re unification. and the mission for the chinese people's liberation army has always being the national unity. so there is no doubt this mega trends of national unity will be achieved it as being the mega

u. s. is really not going to benefit from realty in the middle east. as we know, fuel prices are more instability in the middle east would even make that work, not just for the us, but for the international community as well. so we have, we see a behavior of us supported by the u as impacting the international community and countries that are on the globe, both the u. e and saturday have committed war crimes in yemen. so we have countries that have committed war crimes being brought together by the knighted stage to form an alliance. so i feel sorry for the region. if an alliance like this for criminals is going to be established. and again, that will lead to a lot of food scares in the region. a large number of military personnel have flooded the streets of colombo, nor this comes amid mass unrest in shall anchored despite the nation wide curfew. a large number of soldiers and miniature vehicles off patrolling the streets with tanks and fences placed along city roads. the ministry presence was expanded after yesterday's demonstrations when protestors

u. s. is really last ground in the region and elsewhere as we've seen in eastern europe as well. and part of that is the obama administration, you know, the result of the obama administration and policies. ok, well, joe biden said when he addressed the meeting on saturday, he said washington's not walking away. we're not going to leave a vacuum to be filled by russia. china or iran, is he doing enough now to, to try to, to make men's to make good with the gulf states with saudi arabia, partners? well, i think, personally, he's saying the right things. and moreover, i think the united states administrations before have we said the right things. i don't necessarily think he said anything new the, you know, what we heard were a lot of statements that, of principles, of declarations and statements of principles. but you know, time will tell i, i think that just expand upon what as i had mentioned, indeed there is this notion that there is this vacuum and i think it's been prominent in the past years, especially after the arab spring, et cetera. we're where people are talking about th

u. s. is really partnership. america's commitment to israel security way and to ensure iran would never acquire a nuclear weapon based on the other main topic of discussion. israel's integration and the region. israel's piece with his neighbors. these are essential gall tomorrow. i'll be the 1st american president to fly from israel, directly to jetta saudi arabia. i represents important progress, mr. president, you will meet with the leaders of saudi arabia, katara, quaid, oman, and iraq. i would like you to pass them all a message from us. our hand is outstretched for peace. we are ready to share our technology ready for our scientists to collaborate and our business is to corporate opposition. leader benjamin netanyahu got 15 minutes of face time, a man not used to taking a back seat during u. s. presidential visits, netanyahu has worked hard to undermine his opponents, accusing them of being on statesmen like and unqualified to lead. these images will no doubt work in the pete's favor had of november's elections. israel's 5th, in 4 years. this trip is less about who is or will be prime mini

u. s. administration and what nato don't want. they don't want to see russia. iran, china is where, like cuba, the d, p r k, and other countries aligning and really, but i, you know, against dollar had gemini, and the u. s. nato, you know, imperialists of that. you see all over the region. christopher, you bring up a very good point about this multi polar world, and we also have heard that iran is interested in the bricks alliance as well. why is the us so concerned about the strengthening of ties between russia and iran? look at iran is it is a major repository of oil, and that's always been why it's been in the imperialist sites. that's why the british, in 1953 along with the ca, over 3 months, that back democratic leaders went to nationalize the oil. and because you're not in 79 after you know, the overthrow of the shop, they don't want to listen to washington. they wanted to have their own foreign policy. they are very much for a different type of world order. and so you, what you see now is that iran is interested to join russia, china and other countries to really build that. and that ultimately threatens wall street in the u. s. military h

u. s. orchestrates, coo day toss on in other countries on a mainstream media outlet like cnn. i mean, that could really, like you said, open pandora's box in terms of how people view the legitimacy of washington's foreign policy decisions. we've already seen bolton's comments, draw quite a bit of criticism from the u. s. is european allies on twitter already, and i mean, do you remember was one guy doe, america's yes man, who basically tried to overthrow the venezuelan government several years ago. i mean, he's definitely going to look a lot less like a freedom fighter now and a lot more like a foreign agent to your average american and bolton, even called vin, as well as government in a legally elected government. i wrote about venezuela in the book and it turned out not to be successful, not that we had all that much to do with it, but i saw what it took for an opposition to try and overturn and illegally elected president and they failed. we have to understand that bolton's admission of failure in venezuela, his admission that washington organizes coup d'etat around the world. i mean, this all actua

u. s. is escalating tensions and the u. s. sales of vom just serves the only purpose of fueling the pages more. i think the u. s. strategic ambiguity is really misleading the american people. it's misleading it's allies in the west. it's misleading everyone else in the world. the united states has no legal right to interfere in the taiwan affairs, all to become an obstacle to the national renew vacation of china. i think what the united states is doing is getting involved in a civil war. i'll finish the 1949. we want to prevent the resurrection of that civil war, but whatever the united states is, duty is adding fuel to the fire and may, it may really cause the resurrection of last civil war. that will be a disaster in the cross straight relations. but while the u. s is promising more weapons to taiwan, a huge flow of western arms and financial support continues to pour in to ukraine. now questions are increasingly being put forward if that's leading to weapons smuggling in europe. the ear, though not overly concerned, recently reiterating that the ukrainian government's a reliable ally. you has no reason not to trust a government as weapons

u. s. how is this trip being viewed? well, it's, it's really important to note as you saw, the president walk away there, the american public is doing pretty much the same. they're not paying attention to their president. in fact, a, we were looking to see how these headlines were playing out. it's the equivalent of up page 3 in the newspaper. it's not getting the front page billing because americans don't care about these issues right now. the care about the kitchen table issues. inflation is sky high and the united states food prices, fuel prices, mortgage and rent prices. that's what they're focused on. and this president is not delivering what they need. and as a result, they've turned their backs as well. it's, it's worth pointing out. he is to saudi arabia. next, perhaps this is the reason for his trip. you talk about domestically high fuel prices. he's going to go to saudi arabia and try and get the oil supply increased, which will benefit his people. do you think that the underlying reason for his visit? it is the reason for the visit a

u. s. president joe biden and is really prime. it's a yellow pete have signed a non binding declaration to prevent a run from acquiring nuclear weapons, widens, says it's vital to world security to ensure that iran never has a nuclear weapon. on to other news, now ukrainian officials in the eastern hon screeching se russian troops have destroyed food warehouses in the area. moscow claimed full control of the hands last week. after intense fighting footage on russian state tv shows what it says is the aftermath of ukrainian shelling and residential areas. russian forces have been focused on capturing all of the dumbass region, which includes la hans and don yeske. united nation that says progress has been made on a deal to secure the export of ukrainian grain. it could go a long way to addressing the global food crisis. the agreement was made during talks in istanbul and involves forming a coordination center to ensure the safety of supply routes or diplomatic editor james base, is that the united nations senior you, and officials.

u. s. and it's is really allies claim. there's no reason to believe that the killing was intentional. tel aviv has not held any one accountable, but to get more on this, we're going across live now to journalist and middle east analyst robert in la cash . robert, thanks a lot for joining us on the program. first of all, i just want to ask you, what's your take on why the u. s. continues to deny that israeli forces killed the journalist intentionally? i think the u. s. biden administration views, this incident is somewhat of a nuisance, and that seems to be the way they're, they're treating it from the get go on the 1st day that it was announced that sherry and hadn't been to have the wherewithal to conduct a thorough investigation itself. it's clear that the israelis did not want to investigate it primarily for political reasons. and of course, you know, it's very rare that they hold their soldiers properly accountable when they kill palestinians and american citizens as well, to be honest with you. but then later on now t

u. s. yeah, i've been tell us a bit more about that because when we've been talking earlier you've, you've said that the national papers in the u. s. have not really been paying attention to this trip asshole, but perhaps now with the saudi visit, they will be looking at it a bit more closely. why is this not a priority? it hasn't been a priority because americans are struggling. and in many ways they're, they're not an only angry at the u. s. president because they're struggling. they're also angry that they feel he's absent as they are struggling. so imagine this, the, there are dealing with 41 year highs in terms of inflation. 9 point one percent is higher than even the government expected. and that is translating to high prices and food, rent and fuel costs. and then imagine that your president is not there to deal with it so it doesn't look good. and so the president is not getting the headlines that he wants. in fact, just the opposite. i, if he is able to convince the saudis to pump more oil and bring down these gas prices, that would be a much needed when, politically, for the present. he does have congressional elections looming in novemb

domestic audience, it does really pinpoint what the key differences in the read out from the chinese side. that said that the one china principal was the bedrock for sino u. s. relations which it really isn't president biden, in the discussion, also talk about the u. s. being committed to the one china policy, which essentially means that acknowledges that there is any one china, but it doesn't necessarily see that beijing is the so legitimate governments of china, including taiwan. so that is the key difference. the read out also says the u. s. should on the one china principle, so it's not only about not wanting visits from us officials to taiwan or american lawmakers having close relationships with taiwanese officials. but it's also essentially calling on the usaa shifting policy altogether on taiwan. and a foreign ministry spokesman in beijing has warned again that china will take action. if the speaker of the house of representatives visits taiwan to china has repeatedly made it clear to the u. s. s. serious concern of speaker pelosi potential visited to taiwan and our firm opposition to the visit. if the us side challenges i reply, it will be confront

u. s. dark doesn't really disturb their trade investment people to contact. so what i was trying to say is this is not aren't in between time and less. they're heavily dependent on each other. and of course they can say anything, the longer telegram or the white house national security strategy creating or others. nevertheless, what is important is to have more dept in the us trade is $100000000.00 on china. us treated as a just mention 708 and there is more chinese investment in the u. s. their total chinese investment in india is $8000000000.00 for the 16 trillion dollar the economy. just about $8000000000.00 in india. our chinese investment outside is $1.00 trillion dollars. majority of that, or a large part of it is in the u. s. i in canada and europe. so what i was trying to say is funny about b d statements given by the chinese ministers. and if you aren't a, b, b, there is a strategic depth between them. china, your trade is over $600000000000.00 and china's investment in c plus 17 countries is quite huge. italy, spain are all of those countries. fortu

u. s. dark doesn't really disturb their trade investment people to contact. so what i was trying to say this is not in between china and us that heavily dependent on each other. and they can say anything longer. telegram ought to be wide, call us national security starter. don't print or others. nevertheless, work is important to have more depth in the us trade is $100000000000.00. china u. s. period of it just mentioned 708. and there is more chinese investment in the us. their total chinese investment in india is $8000000000.00 for a 16 trillion dollar economy just about a $1000000000.00. bar. chinese investment outside is $1.00 trillion dollars. majority of dark or a large part of it is in the us. i'm canada and europe. so what i was trying to say is forget about the, the statements given by the chinese minister digital exports of the day, the steady depth between them, china, your trade is over $600000000000.00 and china, the investment in c. c, 17 countries is quite huge. italy, spain, all of those big countries are to illegally breeza and spain. that ru

u. s. dark doesn't really disturb their trade investment people to contact. so what i was trying to say this is not between china and less heavily dependent on each other. and of course they can say anything longer, telegram ought to be white house national security guard that you don't print or other. nevertheless, work is important to have more depth in the us state is $100000000000.00. china us state, i've just mentioned 708 and there is more chinese investment in the us. the total chinese investment in india is $8000000000.00 for a 16 trillion dollar economy just about a $1000000000.00 in india. but chinese investment outside is $1.00 trillion dollars . majority of dark or a large part of it is in the us. i'm canada and europe. so what i was trying to say is funny about the, the statements given by the chinese ministers and digital exports of the day in the steady depth between them. china, your trade is over $600000000000.00. and i know the investment in c, c, 17 countries is quite huge. italy, spain want to go all those big countries or to illegally rea