u. s. to europe. there, there is no big discount. there is, there european countries are, while european citizens, i should say, are paying through the nose for their friends across the gland. to, to make bigger profits. that's. that's true, isn't it? that's just fox. yes, this is not only, this is fact, this was forced to it according to say, my hearse. it's the us who blew up be, or who made to who are behind the blow up of the na stream to pipeline, to make it exclusively that only the u. s. and norway can deliver gas. and then before they really pushed the german energy industry towards a gas and they are the only ones delivering it. so this is all about sucking out the germans and knocking them down. and the german economy has a disadvantage by these super high price with energy prices, but they cannot survive with. and i think business exactly what is about the u. s. is getting rid of a competitor with the help of their puppets in the european commission. oh, is food for thought when you're in the program? i can, thanks for your

europe and may even lower them state side. that's the problem. german economists like a hummer believes the u. s. wants to make europe compliant under its roots. now the europeans wondering let it benefits us and not them. so nearly everything that comes from the u. s. against the people in europe, it's against the economy in europe. because america now wants to psycho europe for its own benefit and they want to make sure that germany, especially, but europe, economies is under the thumb of the us and they cannot survive on their own. so the europeans, i know, are some or europeans are now recognizing that this is the case and that they did really bad behavior against the european economies. you don't do this because of the environment. you do this because of economic dependence. this, this is the war of the us again, europe against germany, especially according to say, my hearse. the us who are behind the blow up of the na stream to pipeline to make it exclusively that only the u. s. and norway can deliver gas. us is getting rid of a competitor with the help of their puppets in the european commission. o

to 5 gateways in the u. s. now they really need to be felt that, that, that network to cover other places like co cutter and tonight into the u. s. and also europe as well, 47 flights to week, as opposed to en route, for example, which has over 100 flights a week from to buy it to the u. s. it to 11 gateways more than 11 gateways. that's the big difference. devise a small market so that taking that chunk of traffic away from india. so in this area is trying to do, it needs to build up that level of confidence with the order the new aircraft can open up numerous bilateral committee and really make, make a go for it. so it's sort of, it's will have to improve at the end of the day as well. ready and that there's a big task force internally within a range of looking at service. look, you have a market that their operations look at how they sell their operations. look at the distribution and distribution assets they have in terms of who they sell for travel agents online direct the website. the website still has a long way to go to improve that level of service. but the task force, there's a number of task forces within that transformation program,

well, it's very complicated to panic. tap dance as far as i'm concerned. they need, especially europe because the u. s. has a lot of sanctions against exporting high tech to china, so they need to kind of clawback influence in europe. have a charm offensive make the europeans think that they're on their side and that that's why they're trying to sell the idea of being a mediator. because they need to buy high tech from the high tech that the u. s. want sell them in addition to that, they need access to european markets and they want for direct an investment from europeans. and there's also the issue of captured elite we seen in europe. certain industries like perhaps the car industry will benefit by having investments go to china. we saw immediately after the i have concerns. we are saying china has concerns of a c o meeting. chancellor shields got on a plane brought leaders of rush of german industry with them to beijing to make deals. and so i think that there are a lot of moving pieces to all of this. and let's remember russia is a storm by china is really climate changes as one way put it. yeah, v

and therefore, we have to create our own industrial standards and serenity. so this is a mutual interests of europe and the u. s. and to make this mutual interest becoming a strong partnership, we need to solve some problems with milla has mentioned some concrete items. the idea behind it is that a strong green industrial market in the u. s. and a strong green industrial market in europe will help each other that we boot to green bridge over the atlantic and help each other. because the goal is the same. fighting global warming and creating a new industrial resilience and industrial independence in a way the german economy, sir, but how they speaking there for more on that a visit to washington. i'm not joined by battles bart managing director of the german economic institute. a welcome to d w. so both sides agreed on full transparency about this years. so the subsidies is that the best deal that the 2 ministers from europe were able to get i think it was not plausible or not, not the possibility of change the place redox back there with that visit. it had been long debated in the us to go to a very, very painf

and therefore, we have to create our own industrial standards and serenity. so this is a mutual interest of europe and the u. s. and to make this mutual interest becoming a strong partnership, we need to solve some problems. we, robert, has mentioned some concrete items. the idea behind it is that a strong green industrial market in the u. s. and a strong green industrial market in europe will help each other that we boot to green bridge over the atlantic and help each other. because the goal is the same. fighting global warming and creating a new industrial resilience and industrial independence in a way for a german economy minister, robert havoc they're speaking in washington. over to wall street, travel dependent companies are reporting spikes and sales and profits assigned that tourism is recovering, is global coban 19 protocols, ease sales for trips and luxury cruise line. royal caribbean shot up 165 percent higher than pre pending levels. that sequence of companies, 4th quarter results, the shares for car rental company hertz, rose after posting 4th quarter earnings, that beat expectations over dns quar

u. s. that it is not the suspect. but why, why, why do they seem so afraid to say something to, to push back to joe? well, 1st of all, they're still u. s. troops in europe to look at the entire post. more history was only childs the gall when he stood up to nato and take them out of france, withdrew. during the year of the lead, up to the rock of a 2003, germany and france joined russia and china to vote against their resolution to authorize the invasion of iraq. those are the only 2 times in 506070 years now, where western european leaders decided to go against united states look at my call . and he said in a conference that he didn't believe in regime change in a russia, he didn't believe a huge, always talked about an unsecured architecture in europe. and then he does nothing. so at least he speaks, even shouts made some good noises at the beginning that we have to accommodate rochard abs, security interests. they do nothing till their instincts might be good and they get pulled back. don't ask me that because i don't know what they have on these people . they could destroy them, maybe their political careers, who knows what else. but the united stat

to u. s. policy in eastern europe. so there seems to be a rising amount of discontent among americans regarding billions of dollars. the u . s. government is pouring into kiev, and that, that dissent is being heard in the floors of congress. so we'll see how things play out. taken us through all votes ortiz, kill him up and in new york, just on to if it and mystery. russia's top diploma has wrapped up his latest tour of africa. breaking down survey laross trip. pierce ortiz, bureau guffman cartoon. the last days of russian foreign minister. se gay lover of stores africa his visit to sir does. capital city coincides with the trips by envoys from 5 western countries. the us, britain, france, no way and germany decided listed on as at the center of all this attention. both russian sudan consistently come out in the you in support of initiatives aimed at ensuring a democratic world order based on the principles of multi polarity which are enshrined in the un charter in addition to political dialogue. in addition to foreign

we for at least 15 years prior to 2022 were when being em escalation happened, tries to impress on europe and the u. s. which has the decisive influence on europe to sit together and work out formulae security formula that would be acceptable to all because we felt that in the russian security it is threatened and was threatened by the expansion of nato. that was the, the major reason for the, an escalation and all our proposals. so we're in goodwill intentions. they were rejected outright. now, as we see and you know, on various political leaders and make revelations, former former leaders in europe or i'm the or like these are the prime minister. they were no such plants in the west and from, from the beginning. the thank deceives russia, they bluntly in a very on partnership men manner. and the ultimately wanted to, to proceed with those cressy for a plan so, so that our position in on the global stage is diminished and suffers, confirms the year our assessments, assessments that for something is not right with the western attitude towards russia. lavolle has pointed out that nieto countries are se

despite the west continued supply of these nato great rockets and ukrainians use of them to kill civilians, u. s. and europe still claims they are not a party to the conflict. nathan ult, ported to the conflict, we support ukraine, but that doesn't make us pointed to the culture, or we effectively, or to war with russia. no, we are not. not at all. russia is at war inside ukraine. and despite the rhetoric we heard from bruton last night, trying once again to make this about the west versus russia, the united states versus russia, or nato versus russia. nothing could be farther from the truth. in the military operation, 5th months, russia liberated the entire lugens people's republic. the black sea grain deal was also reached between moscow and kiev, with turkey and the united nations helping broker the agreement. ukrainian grain could now return to the international market under the protection of the russian navy. all after the west accused moscow of sparking a wave of world hunger pigeon is weapon ising hunger. he's using feed security as a callous to of war. the decision to weaponized food is moscow's, an

request after requested his western allies for heavy weapons and his persistence appears to be paying off. the u. s. in europe have agreed to send babel takes to you. great. and now president zalinski is pushing for fighter jets on wednesday he spoke to you k lawmakers in london thinking them in advance for shipments of fighter planes that no country has approved. yet. in fact, german chance or olaf sholtes has already ruled out sending any planes to you crate that said, germany, you turn on sending battle tanks shows that positions and policies they can be changed. so today president zalinski, he took his request to brussels into the european union, and this is part of what he heard. the delivery of military capability is not a decision taken at each level of the institutions, but a sovereign decision of the member states. of course, there's a strong coordination, but, and if you have seen the living proof of delivery of military capabilities, but everything else is done and coordinated at the european level. but surely that if they can, that is, i'm very grateful to hear from the european states who are wil

instead of a change in thinking is changing the economy to create something new the economics magazine made in germany on d w. ah, ah, europe calls on the u. s. to rethink green subsidies. will washington, listen, the tray ministers of germany and france travel to the us capital, discuss the mass of financial incentives for the green tab. firms, which have european leaders spoke, also coming up. and here in port ban on russian petroleum products is an effect, complimenting other embargoes by the western russia. energy will help stop financing rushes, won't ukraine expert announce on chris called, welcome to the program. germany is trade minister says we can build a green bridge across the atlantic and build joint green markets. but does washington have an interest in that robert harvey and his french counterpart, rural america, or in the us capital today to discuss the so called inflation reduction act, which congress in the united states passed last year. part of it includes $370000000000.00 and subsidies to remote green manufacturing jobs in the united states, but it excludes many of washington's closest partners. the e fears that this wil

u. s to spending almost $370000000000.00 on subsidies. china subsidies are double that of europe. so how do you see europe competing with the u. s. in china when it comes to the green economy? to start with, maybe if we look at the number of the us, the 370000000000 us been reported very extensively. it's a staggering some in some way, but it's also for the 10 year period. so as a percentage of the u. s. g t p is, well not that much. and a lot of this money is also for things like renewables or transport emissions reductions where europe really has some very serious and successful policy for the last 10 to 20 years already. so part of the american money is also for catching up to europe. then another 6070000000000 will really be about industry. and this is where most of the discussion is euro in europe is a box because the industrial sectors are about traded goods. and this is where the competition can really play a role in europe has also supported industrial innovation quite a bit over the last decade. but it has really focused on the early stage innovation, basically research an

to u. s. policy in eastern europe. so there seems to be a rising amount of just implant among americans regarding billions of dollars us government is boring into kiev and that that descent is being heard in the floors of congress. so we'll see how things play out. ok, something else to tell you about other busy news day south africa's president, cyril, roma pose. the house declared a states of disaster in the country not submit a crippling energy crisis that he hopes to overcome by invoking the emergency powers. the national disaster management center has consequently classified the energy crisis and its impact as a disaster. we are therefore declaring a national state of disaster to respond to the electricity crisis and its impact. well meant is an announcement that was pretty much expected by sort of plaza, considering south africa's grapples with the energy shortage. the opposition was origin tend on finance at our plaza and they intended on haggling his beach, ending in he got to the man with it. but the old was th

u. s. spot in germany in europe. it is a little difficult to find parking spaces or to get into a parking garage. but apart from that, this car is really nice. i enjoy driving it because this one can do what any other half 150 version can do as well. it can tall. it can have a lot of loan purely electric. what else got you one from such a car? wow, full is had to close for you. does that the f 150 lighting back in december 2022 because old 200000 units, they planned on making found bias. people things like that. it said that the tile, what costs with a high load capacity and it's own electric tape, but with a maximum charging speed of a $150.00 kilowatts, says wait for improvements from the prior into the fuel tank is used cooking oil, the environmentally friendly solution for old combustion engines, i always say there are more restaurants than fuel stations. chilion rodolfo products certainly is convinced that this technology and already uses it to power his camper van. he's a convert cancer if i feel i'm doing the right thing. i'm protecting

u. s. and it's finally coming to europe. but this one has a little zap to the ford f 150 lightning. so a purely electric car. let's check it out. welcome to read the f 150 has been the best selling vehicle in the us, the 41 years of the truck. but does the electric version have what it takes to replicate its big brothers success? this car can also give its energy to power little household flop to 3 days. that's crazy and nice feature. i like it. speaking of coffee tricks, if you want to have a january in the middle of nowhere, the f 150 provides the energy you'll need for. and the chuck badge has enough space this because many refrigerators but neat features alone don't make where that vehicle says. what's it behind this? dealing with this car can do anything irregular f 150 can do as well. ford said that was very important during the development of this car, so it has the same payload. it can tow the same amount. this car is basically a better version, or at least, let's say, a non emitting version of the f 150, with combustion engine. the f 150 can so 885 is the fact that the f 15

u. s. and it's finally coming to europe. but this one has a little zap to it. the ford f 150 lightning, so purely electric car. let's check it out. welcome to read the f 150 has been the best selling vehicle in the us, the 41 years on the truck. but does the electric version have what it takes to replicate it? speak rather success. this car can also give its energy to power little household flop to 3 days. that's crazy and nice feature i like it. speaking of coffee tricks, if you want to have a january in the middle of nowhere, the f 150 provides the energy you'll need for it. and the truck badge has enough space this because many refrigerators and that's neat features alone. don't make with said what's it behind with this car? can do anything irregular f 150 can do as well. ford said that was very important during the development of this car, so it has the same payload. it can told the same amount. this car is basically a better version, or at least, let's say, a non emitting version of the f 150, with combustion engine. the f 150 can so 885 is the fact that t

despite the west continued supply of these nato great rockets and ukrainians use of them to kill civilians, u. s. and europe still claims they are not a party to the conflict. nathan, not ported to the conflict, we support ukraine, but dr. michael's pointed to the culture, are we effectively at war with russia? no, we're not. not at all. russia is at war inside ukraine. and despite the rhetoric we heard from bruton last night, trying once again to make this about the west versus russia, the united states versus russia, or nato versus russia. nothing could be farther from the truth. in the military operations, 5th months, russia liberated the entire lugens people's republic. the black sea grained deal was also reached between moscow and keith with turkey and the united nations helping broker. the agreement. ukrainian grain could now return to the international market. under the protection of the russian navy, all after the west accused moscow of sparking a wave of world hunger, payton is weapon ising hunger. he's using feed security as a callous to of all the decision to weaponized food is moscow's and mosco

to expand in ways previously unimagined with soaring budgets, prestige and power. but behind all of this is a u. s. g o strategic game, one that wants to reinforce it's a gemini over europe, not russia down, and then leverage those gains if realized against china. the u. s. thank. secretary has been rated, killed off the heath at big country that shouldn't attack others. russians. foreign ministry spokeswoman replied with his config. paris, reminding anthony blinking off his eye nations track record i think viscerally. most americans don't like to see a big country bullying another and they just feel it's wrong. and one to do something about it. after 2 world wars, the world came together and started the united nations. and countries around the world agreed on some basic rules. some basic principles like one country just can't attack its neighbor. it can't tried to seize its land by force. can't try to erase it from the map. can't bully it. that's exactly what russia is doing. was it not the us that attacked a rock or as a rock, not a small enough country, unless i'm mistaken? lincoln represents the usa and not some other country, so the secretary of state should at leas

russians who run the place, those russians have long assigned western europe or all of europe outside of russia to, to the u. s. camp. mr. book called europe and countries battles of the united states. so there were no big surprises except maybe one that germany was shooting itself in the fort by revising its energy policy and ruptured synergy links with russia. that was perhaps the only surprise that people that people left in this, this done. you tell people on february the 24th so long as the war last i won't say or write a word, but good harm the russian army, its leadership or the commander in chief. does that mean you repudiate all the critical views of put in that you express before february 24th? well, i spend by everything i have written before the 24th and after the 24th. i will go your own record as telling the spiegel correspondent, russia intervention to support the dumbass rebels, was the most serious mistake of putin foreign policy. do you still think that? well, let me, let me tell you this. i'm sure that mister pooty believed that i was not working for russia. when he made that decision there

u. s. a tax on the north stream pipeline system were expected. as the u. s. leadership had blatantly threatened to get rid of the key rush and gas supply route in europe. we have repeatedly voiced russia's position on the balden end of the u. s. and nato. nothing that they did not hide this boasting to the whole world about the intention to destroy the civilian infrastructure, through which you are perceived russian energy resources. we also regularly noted the reluctance of denmark, germany, and sweden, to conduct an open investigation and opposition to russia's participation in it. and this, despite the fact that our country has incurred huge costs, those revelations were made by award winning journalist seymour hersh, who said that the attack on russia's nord stream system was carried out by the u. s . with norwegian involvement. after months of diligent planning. by this decision to sabotage the pipelines came after more than 9 months of highly secret back and forth debate inside washington's national security community about how to best achieve that goal. for much of that time, the issue wasn't whether to do the mission with how to get it done with