reports that there was also something happening at the pentagon that were, was talk about potentially something happening at the u. s. capital, which turned out not to be the case, but we do know that there was a claim, likely dest him for the u. s. capital that was flight 93, the crashed in pennsylvania. so people were in disbelief, and that was a day that changed america forever. and those that can remember it. remember this moment and those moments 20 years ago and it's painful. white house correspondent, kimberly how could that following events for us at ground 0 today, we'll come back to you in a moment. kimberly, but for now, thank you very much. let's close that to shank fell. pennsylvania where we can speak to correspond allen fisher. allan, as you were hearing that from kimberly, there was obviously united flight 93 that ended up being hijacked and then crashed into the field where i believe you're standing. what's planned for that, that site today? well, george bush was president on that day. everyone remembers the pictures of him getting the news of the attacks while reading the young children at a school

u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3 to 9 me. select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right. as the u. s. s. was devastated by war. united states last about 400000 people. had the brits last less than the americans. had your soviets suffered 27000000 deaths. me 27000000. there's an incredible number. i john kennedy, american university commerce that address at 963. he said that was the soviet suffered of world war 2. was the equivalent of the entire united states east of chicago having been destroyed, ah, initially the plan to attack the u. s. s. was code named trojan over time and devolved into pincher bush lanka, crankshaft half moon cog wheel off tackle. and sherry, a deer, december 19th, 949, saw the adoption of the best known plan to wipe out the soviets, ah, operation dropshot, date of attack. january the 1st 1957.

u. s. was uniquely able to impose its will on the rest of the world, you know, and getting to a place where we assume our role as other great powers do constructively working with them. standing up for our values where we, we must, defending ourselves where we must, but not overreaching, not trying to remake the world that america's image. and i don't, you know, i mean, jo biden's been advising advising. you know that we embrace and approach like this for a long, long time. he advised president biden, a president obama, and in 2009 to drop down in afghanistan and refocused our mission. then this is not you know, something that's recent. it's something that a lot of people have known was the right thing to do for a long, long time. no, i know he has and you and i have talked about it in the past that, that, you know, joe biden saw afghanistan as a black hole for money, for loss of lives and for not coming up with a winning solution in the end. some have described our afghanistan departure is som

u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3 to 9. select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right. the u. s. s. was devastated by war. united states last about 400000 people. had the brits last less than the americans did. and the soviet suffered 27000000 deaths. me 27000000. there's an incredible number. i john kennedy, american university commerce and address at 963. he said that was the soviet suffered of world war 2 was the equivalent of the entire united states. eastern chicago having been destroyed, ah, initially the plan to attack the u. s. s. was code named trojan over time and devolved into pincher bush lanka, crankshaft half moon cog wheel off tackle and sharia. december 19th, 1949 saw the adoption of the best known plan to wipe out the soviets, ah, operation dropshot, date of attack. january the 1st 1957. ah. the plan outlined the complete annihilation of the u. s. s. under the democratic guise of liberating the nations from communism that those nations would be wiped out along with communism. in the 1st phase of authoration dropped shot and visited dropping 300 nuclear and 250000

was been nearly a week since the diplomatic crisis a rock did. and finally, the french president, michael, michael, has spoken to the u. s. leader joe biden, in a phone call that we understand was initiated by the white house. well, the white house and the least a palace both put out simpleton news statements, and if you read through the may really seems as if joe biden is saying, many of the things that print the micro wanted said on the public records you have, for example, a biden, admitting that more open consultation with allies would have benefited the situation. office saying that the, the u. s. was counting on french and european engagement in the, in the pacific region bite. and also saying that the u. s. supported a stronger you defense. that's quite interesting. because the whole idea of bolstering you defense has been somewhat controversial with the u. s. in the past, it was certainly something that ruffled the feathers of donald trump. but thought again, is by doing may, can, you can say a concession to the french person tomorrow, micro micro, who for a long time has been saying that, that you must bolster i

u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3 to 9 me select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right. as the u. s. s. was devastated by the united states last about 400000 people. had the brits last less than the americans bid, and your soviets suffered 27000000 deaths. me 27000000. there's an incredible number. i john kennedy has american university commerce that address at 963. he said that with the soviet suffered a world war 2 was the equivalent of the entire united states, eastern chicago having been destroyed, ah, initially the plan to attack the u. s. s. was code named trojan over time and devolved into pincher bush lanka, crankshaft half moon, cog wheel off tackle and sharia. december 19th, 1949, saw the adoption of the best known plan to wipe out the soviets, ah, operation dropshot, date of attack. january the 1st 1957. ah the plan outlined the complete annihilation of the u. s. s. under the democratic guys of liberating the nations from communism that was very nations would be wiped out along with communism. in the 1st phase of authoration dropped shot and visited dro

u. s. was pulling out of afghanistan and a war that was started because of the events 20 years ago behind me here. and in the pentagon and washington and pennsylvania, that there are still service members dying for that. and also the fact that you know, that was the u. s, pulling out of afghanistan to just in the last couple of weeks sort of had added reflection for a lot of people, you know, as president bill clinton was here. brock obama, the current president, joe biden. all here a former president george w bush chose to attend the ceremony in pennsylvania, who was not here at this ceremony and reflection was former president donald trump . he did stop by here within the last couple hours after the official ceremony was over and spoke to a few firefighters, and he chose to spend his day attacking president joe biden saying that the pull out from afghanistan was in his words chaotic and said that it was foolish, big picture here though is a lot of people are focusing on everyone that died her

u. s. was really big news here in australia before was even mentioned in the u. s. because they are, they're joining the big boys in the united states. we see now that france was cut out of the deal. they weren't even told until they read it in the papers that they're deal if they had with a strangely submarines had been disregarded and torn up by the australian and they were now the strands are not going to get these nuclear power subs built by the u s and the u. k. what happened is that france now is even talking about building up the european army. there was a story in the daily telegraph this week that frances, willing to give up. it seemed to create a european union seat up the un security council that had been discussed for those per spun and un for 25 years. that it was an old discussion from more than a decade ago. but of course, britain would never give up its veto, and france would not give up a treat of now britain is no longer part of the you. it will never lose ill keep its veto. france has denied this story, but i wonder whether there aren't discussions

u. s withdraw was clearly and fatally flawed. did that discussion ever come up in terms of maybe that would be a good idea leading all that equipment behind as we bug out of afghanistan. that assessment came in july, much of the equipment. and again, i'll defer to my colleagues at the pentagon who are more expert in this than i am. so i want to ask you, have you submitted your resignation regarding this issue? i have not just like jimmy carter owns the disaster of the iran hostage crisis. you own this and yet he really did not own it in the last 48 hours of his testimony . why do you think they're blank and not be aggressively fact checked by the majority of the press and others were watching this? and what could that mean actually for future military operations that he decides to get to the americans then? i mean, we're only and not even near one yet this administration. well, sadly, i think this shows that the press always has double standards. in some cases they are calm and now i'm not for everything, but by and large, they'r

kimberly, as he was saying, the mood that certainly feels very somber and it is this really broad moment for reflection. i wonder you talking about how the rest of the wild sea is the u. s. and how the u. s. is questioning its own identity, watching them there with the american flag. it makes me wonder. there was so many things that have happened since $911.00, including the use of enhanced interrogation techniques. jack, the detention of people without trial for so long. i see that he 9 men still in custody in guantanamo bay. has there been a reflection in the us on pop? how the perceptions of moral authority have changed? yeah, it's interesting that you asked that question as i can hear the american national anthem playing behind me at ground 0. and we're seeing the displays of patriotism with the american flag isn't being brought in and a procession. and that's what's so interesting about all of this and how times have changed in 20 years. i can remember after the september 11th attacks, the signs of patriotism were everywhere. flags were flying. people wearing them on their t shirts proudly and 20 years later. many don't feel quite the same way about their flag abou

u. s. was going to do. clearly he's at a position where he's on the some criticism on his foreign policy and that's kind of on the way to pull out was handled by the us. some allies think it was handled badly, that route that we've seen in recent days, putting the u. s. against from 6 longest ally over those submarines that now are going to be brought from the us with cooperation u. k. rather than from france and france. very agree about that, but yet this was still a speech all about global cooperation. president biden said he stood before the un general assembly for the 1st time in 20 years as the leader of a nation. that was no longer at war. he said, war would now be a thing of last resort for the united states, and it would only be conducted when they have the will of the american people and where possible with the cooperation of allies. he went on tad, this we've ended 20 years of conflict gas then. and as we close this period of relentless war, we're opening a new air of letters, diploma

it was in the home of man, a way to work for the u. s. ironically, us got a very bad record of murdering civilians. this is their, their style. and i don't believe anybody will be held responsible if they are again, it will be somebody at a low level. i'd like to see the secretary of defense, so called fired. i'd like to see general mileage flyer. but this is not going to happen. very important that the american people realize it is just typical of what the us government does and the rest of the world record. i guess the rest of the world does already recognize that americans need to recognize that be great if that happens. i'm not, i'm not holding my breath, i'm sorry. you're watching all team to national. those are the headlines for this hour, the team and i returned in 30 minutes to bring you the news updates to join us again that the robin driven by dreams shaped by those with me in me. i think we dare to ask me. ah, i don't know. i mean there are some steps in there were rescuing the food that they were not scavenging or were rescui

and as you will call, if you read the documents with miranda was under the final not under the u. s. not under great britain. it was part of a china, it was returned to china. and when you have a years worth of riots in the street, which are being heralded by the united states by britain, no one says any words about it, there's just kind of tough. tough isn't a terrible candidate. so you know, you, you want to put a rosy face on this thing and say that somehow these people, but is it a coincidence that to batch taiwan, hong kong sion, john south china seas. these are all areas literally surrounding china, which are being used to attack it. and this is what you have in china. china is retreating and you're getting the exact opposite of what you were aiming at by attacking it. china is in fact being more defensive and big. why? because us and everybody else says that china is terrible. you cannot deny the daily drumbeat of nonsense that comes out of the press there. where is the evidence hallway? where is the evidence? i mean, all the evidence was passed by great britain, by germany,

u. s. defense budget doubled between 20012008. but i was also struck looking at foreign aid that, that also more than doubled over the same period. how did 911 change the non military side of us intervention abroad? yeah, well i mean, i think part of this is you found the line with the united states government if you want aid and if you want assistance. and if you want to be on the good side of policy making internationally, certainly you, it's very difficult to take money that is, that is for a natural disaster or for a health crisis, for instance, and then come back and say, well, we don't agree with your foreign policy and that's because domestically in the 9 states up the way it works. that's seatbelt laws. for instance, a very normal think passed was if you want federal aid for your highways, you will require that. so this is where the seat belts, whether that's good or bad in that same sort of mentality, is applied internationally. if you want assistance, then you will do our bidding in terms of who, who we go after in your country. i

u. s. t d 's as turkey stolen and buying and, and figured the instrument rather the u. s. t 's did as a manifestation of token. and this is why the quote was so i was so difficult to resolve it now for a while the church was looking for prizes to remind us it's important for sometimes circus thought that the train can service. because in black, the turkey, lars, the operate and then and then nato actor, it's the police closer to death of the major and that you and that there can service it. law. it has been, it hasn't showed up for present. but in that can it's done non target thing that, that kind of thing can be such a, you know, a good prizes, phrases that can get a new data with this kind of so story cancer as a icebreaker in relationship. but it is unlikely to be in the relationship, but it is unlikely to overcome the nature of the interaction with you. but i think anything can we can show to, you know, to change the climate, boston emissions you to change the language of relationship because let's not forget the blink. and in his confirmation speech referred to target as our so called strategic partners. now the believe, quote, targe

u. s. was occupying largely african stones last 20 years for 3rd intensive, many, many other countries around the world occupied by the u. s. and which doesn't necessarily have very friendly relations with that. there has not been many, if any attacks, from these countries talk to over the last 10 years. and during the 20 years, it's a great propaganda. boost for archive. and everywhere got to america as west is actually lost in afghanistan. it's intervention has proved to india and futile and very costly by now or in the foreseeable future, is to be giving countries such as united states, an excuse to mount intervention again in afghanistan on the way down to the last couple of days of campaigning in russia. before 3 days of voting kicks off on friday, throughout the week, here were introducing new to the parties in the parliamentary race, the priorities on voters minds and some insight into the countries politics as well as 1st clarify how the election works. so they'll be 450 m p 's from 225

u. s. was responsibility to take care of the refugees, especially the mass number that the u. s. is now taking into her own borders. well, the question is typical. one is not that simple, but we are responsible. yes and no. in regards to the afghan people, we made a lot of promises to our allies. the problem is betting them to see who actually deserves to come to united states, vetting them is a very difficult task. and inevitably, a lot that come here may be hostile to the united states. i definitely believe that we are going to have some people in here to hate america. and if they don't hate america, by the time they get here, just have them in the public school system for a couple of years. well, i think you bring that up cuz terrell, you know, russia is not taking any of the refugees from atkinson he and with the president vladimir putin actually saying, we don't know who the they are. we can't possibly vet them. how confident are you? cuz there is ask and we do have terrorist cells that are all around the region. how confident are you in these refugees actually being allowed

u. s. was engaging with whom from the tyler bond and how exactly that communication was being facilitated. the u. s. many other western governments, the company government, and they have all urged the taller bonds to form an inclusive government one that could lead to recognition by international actors. and it's just not clear at this stage. if this interim government that's been announced is actually going to meet that criteria. there was a lot of pressure on the taller bond to put forth names that would be acceptable to international actors, to international players, so that they could more fully engage with this taller bond government and perhaps even recognize the taliban government. in other world news fries this tom court of appeal has ruled against one of the countries con largest companies. over allegations that are funded, i saw in syria. the court overturned a ruling not to formally investigate cement, to make a farm for complicity in crimes against humanity. the company continued to

the deal was the u. s. a supposed to be out about gas st. completely. so why are we going to go back in there in any form? what role could the us actually serve in that area, whether it's humanitarian or the of that would actually be beneficial and counter to what we've just gone through the last 20 years? yeah, well i think on the humanitarian part, what's going to be tricky with this is and i'm concerned about our state department and our government writ large and handling and so far talking about a citizen talking about a whether it's mandatory and or what have you. because we cannot trust, you cannot trust this government to do the right thing. well, they say the right thing on, on their press conference is on the general. they say the right thing when they're on the phone, are meeting with world leaders. of course they will. but the taliban is going to be the town and they always have been there going to operate the taliban does. and that's what people need to expect. so giving that, i don't think makes any sense that all these people respect stren

u. s. was engaging with whom from the tyler bond and how exactly that communication was being facilitated. the u. s. many other western governments, the corporate government, they have all urged the taller bonds to form an inclusive government one that could lead to recognition by international actors. and it's just not clear at this stage . if this interim government that's been announced is actually going to meet that criteria. there was a lot of pressure on the taller bond to put forth names that would be acceptable to international actors, to international players, so that they could more fully engage with this taller bond government and perhaps even recognize the taliban government to head on al jazeera, 90 percent of the population need urgent tell beneath feel guess degree region or the world for program says it has no more supplies. we go to germany 1st motor show to open its doors to the public sense. the start of the ah, ah, it's time for the perfect journey to winter sponsored by cut

chinese media was expressing that the u. s. is looking for creating imaginary enemy out of china and it was actually said during the high level meeting, what does that mean, imaginary enemy, could you explain that to our audience? well, china, that feels very sad. i mean, on almost a daily basis, this is kind of drum b to china's this that, and the other thing, there's very little proof, lots of allegations. so, i mean, china has, sees this as a situation where trying the u. s. is trying to play king of the hill, in essence, you know, try to cut down a competitor that's rising. the difficulty is that china is not trying to be a global hedge amman. and the u. s. is trying to maintain its position so they, that imaginary part is all about what the u. s. perceives which china does not agree with. ok, well, i can understand you. i live in russia. i know what it feels like. farrah. let me go to you in knoxville that the problem is here is that china is rising or returning depending on how you want to look at it. and it's the very fac

u. s. was cutters, greatest ally. and throughout these meetings it seemed as though they have been able to try to chart a course forward as far as what to do next. but really, as you mentioned top on the agenda was that humanitarian question at a time. when so many agencies, so many un agencies or warning of a, of a looming humanitarian crisis. and i can't stand the question is going to be, when exactly will that airport be open? when will more a be able to be delivered? and how will that affect afghan send going forward? has a how much am june? thank you. nadia. we spoke to martine flocks to operations manager for the agency, doctors without borders. she says, an already di situation in afghanistan hospital has become worse since the taller bond takeover. with the recent, as she's are fighting, we saw a steep increase of our patients numbers in the various hospitals. for instance, in last regard, where normally we would see 5 homeless consultations in our e r. we reach numbers up to 800. we see in all our health care

u. c. s. u has shrunk considerably since the last vote 4 years ago, and is now the lowest since the lions was created 72 years ago. in 3rd place in the green party followed by the free democratic party and alternative for germany. the left part is very narrow, a fail to get past 5 percent threshold, but will still be represented in the bundis dog as it managed to win 3 constituencies. now, all ballots have been counted, although the result won't be considered official until it's announced by the election agency a couple of weeks from now. with reminder of how the system works, german voters don't directly choose the chancellor. they elected members of the button to start with al, go about picking a chancellor to lead him. practice is always a coalition government. the results from sunday's votes suggested coalition talks, could drag on for several weeks. well, let's cross life to berlin and get some more on this. is peter oliver joining us this morning. good morning. you peter sholtes, celebrating victory and saying he's ready to lead germany. could you, could you break down the results and t

u. s. w t d 's as target stolen it buying and the instrument rather the u. s. t 's did as a manifestation of coca cola. and this is why the quote was so deep, i was so difficult to resolve it. now for a while the church was looking for prizes to remind the us it's important for sometimes circus thought that the you pain 10 started be because in black the turn can lars, the operate as an, as an actor it's position closer to death of nature and that you and that, that can serve it, it didn't look at this. it has been, it hasn't showed up with it. but in that can it's done. non target thing that, that kind of thing can be such a, you know, a good prices at prices that can bit a new data with this camera. so story cancer as a icebreaker in relationship, but it is unlikely to be in the relationship, but it is unlikely to overcome the nature of the interaction. but of candice, i'm can can show to, you know, to change the clinical innovation to change the language of relationship because let's not forget the blink. and in his confirmation speech referred to target as our so called strategic partners. now the believe quote is our strategic

u. s. was like, you know, was, was creating international lions that patrol and waters off caliber back and threatening america away. america sounds threatening china. the us will be up and actually up in our north, but somehow it expects to react with more restraint or decade. now we heard from caleb earlier, who said that france hasn't confirmed the reason why president microns pulled out of addressing the un this time around. the timing though, i'm going to shoot a few people are going to be squinting with suspicion here just how badly is franz taking its treatment by washington. i think crap, taking it very badly indeed. i mean, france feels as if it was step instead. in the back, francis frances reaction to the, to the office deal is a form or a form or a hospital for more openly angry than china's has been. and china is, is, is deeply upset. i mean, tramps, i feel for us there is no way for us to behave to, to america's oldest allied by the way, a country. and so, you know, gave, you know