u. s. was grotesquely overstretch there. our problem was that we ever occupied afghanistan, which has always been the graveyard of nations on the un humanitarian chief cause the urgent aid for the people of afghanistan with 6000000 people are at risk of famine and 900000000 faith. acute food insecurity. afghanistan is a humanitarian crisis, but it's not only that, it's an economic crisis. it's a climate crisis. it's a hunger crisis. it's a financial crisis. poverty is deepening, the population is still growing, and the de facto authorities have no budget to invest in their own future. it's clear to us, i'm sure it's clear to all of us that some development support needs to be restarted. but un save more than $700000000.00 as needed to help us guns survive the coming winter months. with more than half of the population requiring humanitarian assistance, more than 3000000 children are acutely malnourished enough gun histone and the you and warns many could die without treatment. for the us rule, don't really thing $3500000000.0

u. s. was tacitly over a stretch there. our problem was that we ever occupied afghan. i mean, well, life goes on in crimea despite the position of western sanctions in 20 foreseen. oh, he spoke with an italian entrepreneur, he moved to the plains he left 13 years ago and i opened an ice cream shop and the city of sep estoppel roberto lily has new plans to move saying that with the ongoing european energy crisis, it's much easier to do business in crimea, he say the sanctions, there's no significant home to his ice cream business. and despite the ongoing conflict and ukraine, he feel safe and can't see that all the problem. we solve in 201415 because after death, you know, we are here. everything on my italian product is made the bit with her 9 fi, 5 per cent, the pro doctor from from russian meal. her fresh cream for italian product that i used for business. no problem because they came before they came, they came during the period they became now people make this kind of business bring stuff from me to lee this company, they could unmoored along the timer. but anyway,

was kabul. one year ago, as the u. s. withdrew its troops from afghanistan, that was, according to joe biden, a success 20000 people evacuated to safety. that number is more than double. what most expert solar possible. no nation, no nation has ever done anything like it in all history. the only the united states had the capacity to will delude you to do it and we did it today. if biden's disorderly withdrawal succeeded in doing anything, it was depriving the u. s. puppet government and couple of any chance to defend itself and the run up to the pull out u. s. air support for the afghan military was cut off. american troops abandoned bog rom, air base without even warning the afghan commander there. all the while washington knew the country, security forces would only be ready to act on their own. no sooner than 2030. it's no surprise. the afghan military just cut and ran. special inspector general for afghanistan reconstruction found that the single most important factor in the afghan national defense insecurity. foss i

u. s. was grotesquely over stretch there. our problem was that we ever occupied afghanistan a wrongs president has slammed israel in fort factions against his country's nuclear activities was to run, insisting that it's not developing nuclear weapons. tap, you go to reducing the threats of these ready regime. do not have any impact on killing. i talked nuclear scientists. beloved martyrs was aimed stopping on nuclear activities acts of sabotage endeavor. we did not stop us no action from the israeli regime or under our can. countries can stop us and we will not be deterred from developing nuclear energy, which is the absolute right of our nation. to wrong says that israeli 4th is killed for the wrongs top nuclear scientists between 201-2012. while another was assassinated as 2 years ago, that's him, it is really claims that wrong is developing a nuclear weapons program. something to wrong denies. it was defense minister, reportedly told washington the need to maintain the military option against the wrong, as talks to reinstat

the gyptian bones a why harry was osama bin laden's, right hand man before lay to succeeding him as head of al qaeda. the u. s. says he was actively involved in planning the september 11th attacks in the us, as well as other al qaeda operations, including 2 u. s embassy bombings in east africa in 1998. and the attack on the u. s. s. cole warship in yemen, in 2000. following the strike that killed him, the taliban accused the u. s. a violating international principles and the door agreement. but for the americans, it's the taliban who's broken? that 2020 accord by providing cover for the winery who's killing is the 1st known us strike in afghanistan. since washington pulled out its troops a year ago now and nearest to generous and nazi who lived in afghanistan for many years. he said he was surprised to learn that i'm anal zillow . harry had been located in the capital that it was the leader romano z o e r. came to me as a surprise on that old hind on members. also high ranking members have visited, cobble at least and stayed there temporarily since the fall off of count us until the 20 bon was not a surprise.

that was split though that wasn't true. and it wasn't just the u. s. the u. k. foreign office admitted last month and it made a number of mistakes in its own exit from the country and quit it on. this was the fact that the case for in secretary of the time was on holiday and didn't take the afghan foreign ministers call when he reached out for help with the benefit of hindsight, of course it's easy to say but, and i wouldn't have gone on holiday let alone and we've come home of the government . the u. s. had been propping up for nearly 2 decades, was also supported by an embassy that housed around $4000.00 diplomats contractors and staff who provided a false sense of confidence even though they were relying on the intent security provided by the u. s. military. but then again, they didn't invade afghanistan looking to learn about the country. instead, the mission they claim to half was to force american values on the people. and after 20 years, it has become clear that they still haven't learned about the country they occupied for so long. it also appeared as

but if it's likely that they knew he was there, does this name that al qaeda has been operating freely in afghanistan since the u. s. withdrawal? not since the u. s. was throw on, if you go back off alti, though, has never been completely eradicated. so for people who follow the subject, it was always clear that some people, some, okay, i'll kind operatives are round of conason, and how much stated what exactly they did. that was the question mark, but that they are around that, that they are active, has already been the case before it totally been take over again with i'm ronald's of what he it was suspect that that he somewhere into of gone a san pocket on border area with sources, i'm disagreeing on which side of the border that he was incomparable was certainly a surprise, but it all condos around and is not a surprise at all. and can you give us a sense of how this operation was different from the bin laden operation in 2011? it was completely different here. here we were talking about the cia drone shooting, apparently, to rockets into that house, according to u. s. officials. um, it was a type of messiah tha

u. s. was certain international law, principal called the freedom of navigation all to protect the median line between china and taiwan. a boundary which has existed since the 1900 fifties and was crossed over by the chinese more than 100 times during these recent chinese exercises. now today, while major countries like the united states in the u. k has said they want to strengthen trade with taiwan. neither have actually committed just then militarily, if a conflict does ignite between taiwan and china reporting for r t. i'm scotty. now he's and while the u. s. is trying to destabilize china's power over taiwan. asia has that both be in america's back yard. china is influence in latin. america is growing with equity. we're being the latest country to announce it will sign a free trade agreement and kudos production, trade and investments minister julio. jose prado announced that the administration of president dmo la sue seeks to achieve a free trade agreement with china. this year. ecuador jo

u. s. was involved indirectly, they use as it's now up to those nations to either accept or reject the deal. the 2015 pact lift the sanctions on iran and return for guarantees. it will not build a nuclear weapon. us present all truck whopping ins as well as the u. s. will say yes, this is was delivered today for them after 4 days of negotiations to question is a harmony and then joe biden would say, yes to what's on the table. now, do we know what is in the draft? what is the european union saying about this? final text no kit in detail. i'm clarity that i would say, for example, how do this take a sanction really in the future sanctuary? it was the revolution of the iran hole with the sanctions really will be lifted so that they could not make her possibilities are getting better whole with iran in the shrink it c or a new matt richman, which has improved in the last 2 years tremendously and not at least i would do the with sure the iranians in 2024 and the republican president would be like t

was osama bin laden's, right hand man. before later succeeding him as head of al qaeda. the u. s. says he was actively involved in planning the september 11th attacks in the us, as well as other al qaeda operations, including 2 u. s embassy bombings in east africa in 1998. and the attack on the u. s. s. cole warship in yemen, in 2000. following the strike that killed him, the taliban accused the us of violating international principles and the doha agreement. but for the americans, if the taliban who's broken that 2020 accord by providing cover for so i re who's killing is the 1st known us strike in afghanistan since washington pulled out its troops a year ago. journalist from sir mark we lived in afghanistan for many years, asked whether he was surprised that the owls are here. he had been living in couple i my thought surprised her place where he was target to this about 10 minutes walk from my apartment in calm blue. i would dare to say everybody else was also surprised. it must have been only a very small circle that knew his whereabouts. and that set to have context as him to

u. s. joint chiefs of staff receive report number 3 to 9 and select 20 targets to attack in the soviet union with nuclear bombs. the time was right, is the u. s. s. o was devastated by wall. it either states last about 400000 people had the brit sloss less than the americans did add to soviet suffer 27000000 deaths bmw 27000000 is an incredible number. mm. but john kennedy gave us american universities commencement address. 1763. he said that what the soviet suffered of world war 2 was the equivalent of the entire united states east of chic .

u. s. ditch in the 1st place. what was your reaction to actually steal the u. s. sync in its own ways in from one side? actually it is 2 sides. you cannot force iran to back to g, g and agreement. why you are still continue to increase the sanctions and a towards was not iran who withdrawal from agreements g towards you like to state actually is be just so you're not just yet tactical can eyes that iran sanctions will not work. and it is already too late. and have to get agreement going back to j agreement by removing just sanction. otherwise it will not work. yeah, considering president from quit the iran nuclear deal, really in the blink of an eye, it seemed how how does that contribute to the overall feeling of security in such agreements? in fact, i think today i hear brailey people chain greeley to start with on 15 that cause i am or z really the limit in order to start a real deal with iran at that time. iran doesn't have as much capability. and the capacity, particularly for j leachman and it was the time really dead, disagreement has to hold and continue

u. s. was out to get him on the, on this time round. they've got lucky, so that shouldn't be surprise for anybody. and the question is, now, what will be the, the repercussions? because just as the u. s. policy of saying ok dialogue with the taliban will solve everything they're gonna, you know, they're going to abandon not they have to think of okay. of on us as too big to ignore what we do on the country. but also the taliban have over the past 11 months, the the pragmatists in the leadership have been banking on the idea that eventually we'll win international recognition. and on the back of international recognition will be able to unlock, access to international finance, will be able to run the state and more sense. we will be offer something spoke to our own which id and, and our people. and over all of the afghan population they are and they, the region and the world will accept us as a reality in the country that and that policy has been blown up because nobody's going to recognize a regime or which no said all things that the t

was split. no, that wasn't true. and it wasn't just the u. s. the u. k. foreign office admitted last month and it made a number of mistakes in its own exit from the country. and on that list was the fact that the u. k. foreign secretary at the time was on holiday and didn't take the afghan foreign ministers call when he reached out for help with with the benefit of hindsight, of course, it's easy to say, but i wouldn't have gone on holiday, let alone. and we've come home on the government, the u. s. had been propping up for nearly 2 decades, was also supported by an embassy that housed around $4000.00 and diplomats contractors and staff who provided a false sense of confidence even though they were relying on the intent security provided by the u. s. military. but then again, they didn't invade afghanistan looking to learn about the country. instead, the mission they claim to half was to force american values on the people. and after 20 years, it has become clear that they still haven't learned about the country they occupied for so long. it also appear

now, go ahead in hong kong for china was never an ambiguity. de china knew all along the long term plan. this is not the 1st time that a, the u. s. is going against chinese sovereignty. and he just mentioned before in hong kong, the attempt of color revolution, hong kong was full sponsored back by the u. s. addition to that, they were financing e t. i am the separatist wiggers inside john and a lot of them are actually terrorist or dial. emma has been financed by the c. i assume the 1950s. so you see this is not the 1st time that the u. s is meddling into chinese sovereignty. i like what just know andy just mentioned before about hong kong. you see what happened in hong kong is that china, she used to set back to journey to a novel tricky because of the riots they had in hong kong. the enacted a national security low, which by the way was sign a petition was signed by 2300000 people. so a very large majority of people, they sign they, they backed b gene for enacting the special security law. and this became actually a 2nd handover, or actually maybe the when the handover of hong kong to china because there were lots of agents, a

u. s. was very much involved with expanding economically and geopolitically at the time. but in europe, in other places, i'm sure it was, was considered far more significant other than i personally viewed it at the time. but you know, we again use a tragic figure. i think the popish some things, but not very balanced here between east and west relationships. i think it was more at the expense of russia than it was the u. s. wanted to ask you before i let you go, mr. asthma's also get just running low on time here, but it's of this, the subject we could talk about to the cows come home. the berlin wall came down roughly 30 or 3132 years ago. but some would say that an almost invisible barrier has been erected since then, perhaps mid atlantic, because some say that the cold war came to an end, but a new cold war has begun. one of our previous guests during our special coverage and breaking news, her naughty international said to me that he believed the cold war never really came to an end. why are we in the position we are said day considering the historic agreements that to

u. s. was staying there while there was a republican government in hiding. now since a thought on takeover, for example, un reports have indicated that they move around more freely. so that i'll kind of is around is not a surprise in itself. the big question is, what exactly are they doing? are their trust hiding out? are they're planning things their it gets tricky where information is barely available that they're around. that was more or less clear. and a can you see what, what differences do you see between this operation operation to kill osama bin lot in in 2011. from a technical standpoint, there were 2 completely different alterations here. it was on a strike with a drone. so no u. s. boots on the grounds, exactly the way that president biden said they intend to do counter terrorism, that they don't need this huge presence. base is on the ground to do such things. where a bolt up up mission that killed in lawton, m u. s. helicopters started from a base in afghanistan crossing into pakistan. um, you had us hold to us on the ground haunting to target t

u. s. s. all was devastated by wall the it either states last about 400000 people at the brits last lesson. the americans did. and the soviets suffer 27000000 deaths. mm mm. 27000000 is an incredible number. in with john kennedy gave us american universities commencement address it back to 63. he said that what the soviet suffered of world war 2 was the equivalent of the entire united states. east of chicago. have you been destroyed? mm. initially the plan to attack the u. s. l was code named trojan over time it evolved into pincher bush, mega crankshaft, half moon, cold wheel, off tackle. and sherry, dia, december 19th, 1949, saw the adoption of the best known plan to wipe out the soviets operation dropshot, date of attack. january the 1st 1957. the plan outlined the complete annihilation of the usaa under the democratic guise of liberating the nations from communism. but those very nations would be wiped out along with communism. in the 1st phase of operation dropped shot and visited dropping 300 nu

u. s. was hoping that china would overreact the idea that china was going to shoot down below his plane is pretty preposterous. it's certainly not in the nature of chinese behavior around the world. but i think that's why the u. s. moved to carry your groups to the region. they were hoping for a big dramatic reaction if not shooting down at least forcing down the plain. that didn't happen because that's not how china rolled right. just like al rush, not how russia roles until it was forced to. and so they didn't get that. and so the gloves are off and chinese, it's ok. we can wait this out. we can't housing, economic pain, we can't wait for elections and have a pro. you re unification. goverlan, daniel, don't you find it really interesting again, to the parallel with ukraine, you know, is that the way the west a particular united states talks about russia's special military operation that they're failing and all this, they always protect what they would do. so we would shoot down the plane. yes

u. s. was caught unaware, and completely off guard to the commander of us forces in afghanistan. alerted the pentagon. cobble could be surrounded within 30 day, an alarming prediction that turned out to be way off. what he's talking about here is a failure of intelligence. so we saw across the world we saw in washington, knew the pentagon had no idea this was happening. however, what the us learn the hard way was i just because it spent nearly $90000000000.00 training. the afghan defense and security forces did not mean that their army of around $300000.00 would be able to take on the taliban without the u. s. military there to support them. and yes, that's despite the claims made by the biden administration, that they just needed to drank then their unity and political will in order to succeed. ultimately, the african national security defense versus had the equipment numbers and training to fight back. they have what they need, what they need to determine is if they have the political will to

u. s. was hoping that china would overreact the idea that china was going to shoot down below his plane is pretty preposterous. it's certainly not in the nature of chinese behavior around the world. but i think that's why the u. s. moved to carry your groups to the region. they were hoping for a big dramatic reaction if not shooting down at least forcing down the plain. that didn't happen because that's not how china rolled right dislike. i'll rush, not how russia roles until it gets worse still. and so they didn't get that and so the gloves are off and chinese is okay, we can wait this out, we can cause economic pain. we can't wait for elections and have a pro, you re unification. goverlan. daniel, don't you find it really interesting. again, there parallel with ukraine, is that the way the west a particular united states talks about the russian special military operation that they're failing and all this, they always project what they would do, how we would shoot down the plane. yes. but they