u.s. supreme court has just dropped a ruling and i'm going to try to parse this out for you. the u.s. preme court has sided with congress and the high stakes power struggle over presidential recess appointments. officials placed in top government jobs without senate approval, in other words the president didn't wait for senate approval to appoint these people and the u.s. supreme court has ruled that is wrong. let's head out to the u.s. supreme court and pamela brown. there you are. so tell us more about this ruling. >> right. so carol, the justices unanimously handed over a big win to congress. it's a big defeat for the white house. this has been a power tug of war between the legislative branch and the executive branch for years. a lot of people might not understand that the president has the constitutional authority to temporarily appoint people to very prominent positions, talking cabinet members, talking board members, judicial positions and in this specific case the president appointed three people to the national labor board when congress was supposed to be in recess. however, t

u.s. supreme court and that was the case that was heard by the supreme court in 1856 and again in 1857 when they actually rendered their decision. it is interesting that sanford his name is on the case and he doesn't come into it until 1854 when they go to the federal courts. sanford is also a key player in where we know the scotts were returned by the supreme court but they were set free in this room a couple months later. the way that happened was sanford died in new york state and upon his death the ownership reverted to his sister and to her husband. he was an abolitionist and he was a sitting member of congress at this time. suddenly, he finds he's the owner of the most famous slaves in the united states just literally overnight. he wanted to divest himself of these slaves as quickly as he could before the press found out. he sold the scott family for a token dollar to taylor blow, one of the sunday of the original family from the plantation where scott was born back in virginia. taylor blow brought them into this courtroom and set them free in 1857. so the scotts achieved the freedom

u.s. supreme court took up a similar debate 45 years ago well before the digital age.k then it ruled that a threatening statement is not a crime unless there's proven intent to follow through. g to pay for college. >>> a big perk tonight for people who work at starbucks, the company is going to pay for college. starbucks will pay full tuition for baristas who work at least 20 hours a week, have at least two years worth of college credit and get accepted into the online degree program at arizona state. >> i never thought i would be getting the assistance and the help that starbucks is providing. it just never crossed my mind. >> the program goes into effect this fall. >>> the music was so beautiful even the guy playing it swooned. he was performing in a piano competition in san jose when suddenly joe vazquez shows us he almost passed out. old sebastian di competing saturda >> reporter: playing a beethoven sonata is tough enough. when the theater has no air conditioning and san jose's outside temperature is in the 90s, it can be downright show stopping. ish his performan

u.s. supreme court. first in utah. the 10th u.s. circuit court of appeals ruled same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. >> it's a great day for everyone in utah and a great day for the entire nation. i just hope that the stay doesn't last too long and that the marriages can continue. >> now, this ruling applies to six states under the appeals court's jurisdiction but the judges put the ruling on hold pending an appeal. and in indiana, a u.s. district court judge ruled the state's law banning same-sex marriage is not constitutional. so let me bring in senior fellow at the center for american progress action fund, aisha moody mills and democratic strategist and chair of the gay and lesbian victory fund, steven elamendorf. steve, seems like we're getting a decision in favor of same-sex couples, something moving very fast. every few days, seems like we're hearing about this. almost half the country lives in a state where same-sex couples can be married. how close are we to having marriage equality nationwide? >> i think we

. >> woodruff: the u.s supreme court handed down a pair of unanimous decisions today in two high-profile cases. in one, the court reined in the appointment powers of the president. the justices ruled that president obama's temporary appointments to the national labor relations board in 2012 were illegal because congress was not in recess. the justices also struck down a 35 foot buffer zone prohibiting protests outside abortion clinics in massachusetts finding the limit violated the first amendment rights of demonstrators. marcia coyle of the national law journal was at the court this morning, and she joins us now.

u.s. supreme court.s is a blow to this naral. >> she has a strong reaction to today's ruling here at the high court. you told me you are disappointed. >> i'm extremely disappointed what we saw today was five male justices essentially ruled that discrimination against women is not discrimination at all. in fact, their narrow judgment said that it's absolutely okay for bosses to make personal decisions for women about our health care, which we made for with our labor and that's unacceptable. and make no mistake. as justice bader ginsburg said. this is startling its in its breadth. that's not what we stand for. we value religious liberty but that means i don't have to do anything i don't want to do and i don't get to tell you what to do and i think today it's a sad day for women, a sad day for religious liberty and a sad day for the supreme court. >> just to recap, this ruling is basically saying these closely held companies can be exempt from providing coverage for four types of contraception. how do you f

u.s. supreme court right now. the decision is expected later this morning. see media and members of the public are there awaiting the decision out in front of the steps of the supreme court. certainly there will be plenty of comment on both sides once this decision is released. hobby lobby says it is willing to pay for some types of birth control but says things like morning-after pills and iuds go against its religious beliefs. live in morgan hill, i'm mark sayre, kpix 5. >> hundreds of protestors on both sides of the issue will rally outside the court today, as well. >>> >>> it was a sweltering weekend in many parts of the bay area and more dangerous heat is in the forecast. it got close to 100 at the alameda county fair in pleasanton yesterday and medics took 30 people to the emergency room to be treated for heat exhaustion. >> not drinking enough water or they haven't eaten enough. so we have had a number of people who have been transported today. >> there were about 30,000 people at the fair yesterday and many of them used the misters at a cooling statio

u.s. supreme court decision coming down tomorrow, set to rule on this case tomorrow.edom in companies. we'll talk about it when we come back. stay with us. i'm randy and i quit smoking with chantix. for 33 years i chose to keep smoking... ...because it was easier to smoke than it was to quit. along with support, chantix (varenicline) is proven to help people quit smoking. it's a non-nicotine pill. chantix reduced the urge for me to smoke. it actually caught me by surprise. some people had changes in behavior, thinking or mood, hostility, agitation, depressed mood and suicidal thoughts or actions while taking or after stopping chantix. if you notice any of these, stop chantix and call your doctor right away. tell your doctor about any history of mental health problems, which could get worse while taking chantix. don't take chantix if you've had a serious allergic or skin reaction to it. if you develop these, stop chantix and see your doctor right away as some could be life threatening. tell your doctor if you have a history of heart or blood vessel problems, or if you

u.s. supreme court. in indiana struck down that state's ban on same-sex marriage as well. here in washington, a blunt and unanimous message to police from the u.s. supreme court. get a warrant. when it comes to searching cell phones, smart phones, other mobile devices of criminal suspects without probable cause. let's bring in george washington university law professor jonathan turley. first of all, on this decision, saying that these laws banning same-sex marriage in utah, indiana, they were really unconstitutional, what do you say? >> the trend is becoming overwhelming across the country. it's not just more liberal or democratic states, as you can see, with states like utah. the judges across the country are finding unanimity in their view of these bans. and they're falling almost on a monthly basis. the result is that if the supreme court's going to consider this issue, the pressure is building for them to do so. there are people on that court, including justice scalia, who are opposed to this type of

u.s. supreme court ruled against aereo company. and the police ruled that police cannot search your cell phone unless they have a warrant. >>> and amidst violence in iraq secretary of state john kerry is warning not to intervene or take military action. he said it will own make matters worse. >> this one is a big day at the united states supreme court, and the justices today gave a huge victory to the big four television networks. the justices ruled that the start up company aereo was violating copyright law and take programs from the airwaves and allows customers to watch programming on smart phones and other smart devices. how did aereo do that? >> aereo was arguing to the court that it was not providing television content, just dime-sized antennas that every consumer who subscribed to the service would have their own antenna, and they would use that antenna to access broadcasting and stream it down. but the court argued that it sounded like a cable company and decided it was a cable company, and broadcasters have right to broadc

u.s. supreme court. ruled that hobby lobby does not have to cover birth control for its employees on religious grounds. it came down an hour ago. kyla campbell is live in washington, d.c. outside of the supreme court building with reaction to the ruling this morning. kyla? >> reporter: i was inside the supreme court as justice alito read the opinion. it's a long one. 35 pages. in a 5-4 desi decision, the supreme court ruled ruled on this. decowt christians were against having to provide birth control because they can end life after conception. we did hear from people on both sides of this case after the justices handed down their decision. >> the supreme court has protected our first amendment freedom. no government should foes its citizens to pay for and distribute potentially life- ending drugs and devices. >> we actually think we need to provide as many protectors as possible. we look forward to the action. we're asking congress to act. >> the obama administration is expected to find a way to provide f

u.s. supreme court and the excisions decisions its handing down today. lves your cell phone and privacy and police action. let's head out to the supreme court and check with pamela brown. >> reporter: this is a sweep endorsement for digital privacy and a big defeat for law enforcement. today, the high court ruled that police must obtain a search warrant when searching a criminal suspect's cell phone upon an arrest. that means before they search a cell phone, whether it's a smart phone or a flip phone, they must obtain a search warrant. this greatly strips police discretion to search cell phones. the defendants in this case argued they were convicted in part because of information taken from their cell phone and the defendants argued that police should have obtained a search warrant, that cell phones are fundamentally different than other objects on a person such as a wallet or a purse or that kind of thing and today the high court agreed with those defendants and said that, yes, police must obtain a search warrant before searching a cell phone incident to

u.s. supreme court to await that ruling. she's outside now. describe the scene for us, pamela. >> absolutely. just to put this in perspective, carol, this is the biggest case of the supreme court's term. this is the final day of the public session. as you can see here behind me, the crowds are out today, we have demonstrators on both sides of the issue. this are demonstrators who support the contraception mandate and the affordable care act. they say that companies should be required to provide comprehensive health care coverage of birth control for its employees and then the demonstrators here behind me who say religious liberty rights should trump that, the demonstrators behind me claim that companies should be able to refuse to provide this comprehensive health care coverage of certain types of contraception if it is a violation of their faith. this has been a hot debate for a long time now, carol. we have three contentious issues converging, abortion, religious liberty rights and obama care. it prompted heated rhetoric on both sides saying

u.s. supreme court refuses to hear an appeal from a north bay oyster farm fighting to stay open. the drakes bay oyster company is trying to renew its lease in the point reyes national seashore. but the interior department wants to return the waters it operates to full wilderness status. today by not taking the case, the justices left in place lower court rulings against the farm. >>> happening today, drivers for san francisco's muni system are voting on a new contract proposal. it would work out in the past several -- it was worked out in the past several days, three- year proposal but details are not release. the old muni contract expires at midnight. an effort to have employees pay into their pensions was a key issue during the negotiations. >>> and new at noon now, a california politician is turning the tables on texas officials who have been trying to lure california jobs it their state. california state senator ted gaines is visiting austin, texas today. one goal is it to try to keep california in the running for a battery plant that tesla may build in texas but he is compet

u.s. supreme court -- to the u.s. supreme court, that is it. same-sex marriages won't take place while that appeal is being heard. it sparked mixed reactions. >> this decision is an absolute victory for fairness and equality, for all families in utah, in every state in the 10th circuit and every state in this great nation of the united states. >> i'm disappointed because i do believe that states do have the right, through the democratic process, to make the determination on the definition of marriage. our people have spoken on that issue and that is part of our law. that being said, the sooner we can get to supreme court the better i would like it. >> reporter: it is called a major victory for privacy rights in a unanimous vote police officers must obtain a warrant to search people's cell phones. people are arrested every year for minor ovents and a century now the court says police can search they arrest to look for weapons and a crime but now cell phone searches are off limits unless there is warrant. supreme court dealt a blood to a company

u.s. supreme court declined to hear argentina's appeal of the case. used the term extortion to describe the rule that requires the nation to pay defaulted bondholders when it makes three payments on its restructured debt. the country's next interest in it is done june 30, limiting the time for president fernandez to reach an accord with creditors, including hedge fund managers. is inr michael mckee washington. michael joined me yesterday, and we were discussing the argentinian bond issue. michael, i know that you and i are going to talk about the imf in just a moment, but i wanted to get your reaction to this breaking news and what it means for argentina. >> well, it had been telegraphed by the argentinians. they had said going into the court case that they did not want to comply. the court, one of the arguments before the court was whether or not they could bring a case in which they would not comply with the court ruling, and that may be one reason the supreme court declined to hear their appeal, so now they are following through on it. they do have

u.s. supreme court. we go inside the fbi's supersecret lab for improvised explosive devices. and owning a piece of the derek .eter legacy to our viewers here in the united states and to those of you joining us from around the world, welcome. we have full coverage of these stocks and the stories making headlines on this thursday. alix steel follows the latest earnings report from conagra. we begin with our senior markets correspondent julie hyman, and alibaba announcing plans to list its shares on the new york stock exchange. julie, good afternoon. >> good afternoon. there has been a heated battle between the nasdaq and nyse to win this prestigious listing which might be the largest ipo ever and certainly would be one of the largest tech listings on either of these exchanges. click the new york stock exchange has indeed won this. it is now owned by intercontinentalexchange, or ice. at $160e is estimated billion. it would be behind ipm and oracle among tech companies listed on the nyse. there is a lot of talk about the importance to either of these exchanges in winning this lis

u.s. supreme court. the court has ruled that argentina must pay pack at least $1.3 billion to some bondholders. it goes back to 2001 when argentina defaulted on its debt. most agreed to a huge write-down to help them out, but some refused, and the u.s. supreme court has now ruled that they should be paid back in full by argentina. >> we are going to finish up with this. pizza delivery companies domino's is urging online account holders in france and belgium to change pass words. it admitted that hackers had stolen the details of around 600,000 customers on line. details like customer names and pass words had been stolen, but not any payment details. an unknown twitter user tweeted to publish tening the details online unless domino's paid 30,000 euros. domino's said it would not pay. with that, i am going to hand it over to you, tom. >> thank you very much. i am going to stick to making my 0 o own pizzas for now. let's take a look at what is happening online. web news is next here on "france 24." >> hello

u.s. supreme court ruling requiring the country to pay a group of creditors $1.3 billion. argentina defaulted on its debt and got some creditors to accept a reduced payment. others insisted being repaid in full with interest. they took the case to the supreme court, and it gives bond holders to force buenos aires to reveal where it pays assets. >> buenos aires warns it will not pay vultures. >> translation: i think you need to distinguish request between what is a business and what is extortion. i think these two concepts are different. all the government, all the directors in the areas of the environment and policies need to be open to negotiation. no president in a sovereign country can subject its country, its people to extortion. we have more from the capital venezuela. >> a few hours after the supreme court ruling in the united states, the president of argentina went on state television to say that argentina would pay its agreements, but would not deal with speculators in mystery, referring to the seven or 8% of those hedge fund holders who were fighting this face in

he's argued 43 oral arguments in front of the supreme court -- nine, excuse me, before the u.s. supreme court. he graduated with honors from princeton university and with high honors debate champion at harvard law school. he served as a law clerk to chief justice william rehnquist on the u.s. supreme court. every day, and i follow the senator on twitter, as well as in other areas, and every day i see senator cruz taking on the big issues in order to try to save america before it's too late. there is ted cruz taking on obamacare. there is ted cruz taking on fast and furious. there is ted cruz taking on benghazi. and the irs. and the va scandal. and the bergdahl swap. and the out-of-control government spending. and the president's lawlessness. the list goes on. whenever i see him taking on yet another big issue, i invariably tweet, must ted cruz do everything. and the answer is, invariably, yes, because with the exception of his fellow warriors for freedom here today, he literally has to do everything himself. and thank goodness he's willing to do it. please welcome, a true hero of

supreme court draws the line on abortion protest. how far is too far to make the voice heard? good evening. >> u.s. ffer zone violates the first amendment. san francisco law allows protestors to get a bit closer, 25 feet, and other cities have similar restrictions now, thequestion, are those still legal? we're live now in the mission with the story. vic? >> this is the ruling that struck down the massachusetts law, that 35-foot buffer zone the court ruled it was too broad. now, san francisco filed a brief as friend of the court to support the ordinance. now, by the way in front of the planned parenthood clinic on valencia. that is the zone the city imposed against protests here. now, the question is, it's ten feet smaller but does it violate the law? abortion opponents target the clinic in the mission, standing behind an arc painted around the entrance. this after the board of supervisors approved the buffer zone. opponents maintain any

u.s. supreme court.his dispute dates back to argentina's financial collapse in 2001 when it was unable to pay debts and saying $25 for each spent and hedge funds known as hold out investors refused and took them to court to get the money and they failed and have to pay $1.3 million in cash. >> translator: i think you need to distinguish what is a business and what is extortion. i think these two concepts are completely different. all the government and all the country and directors in the area of government and policies need to be open to negotiations and no president in a sovereign country can subject the government and people to extortion. >> joining me from london is an international law specialist, good to have you with us. this has been quite a long running case, hasn't it, since 2001, what does the decision mean for argentina and does it have to hand over $1.3 billion? >> the context as you point out is quite lengthy, there is the collapse of the argentina currency and as a result they faced an on

u.s. supreme court ruling came down today that got the attention of millions of americans. the court ruled that police must have a warrant before searching your cell phone. >> the ruling hit home because one man who argued on behalf of a defendant is a stanford law professor. cheryl hurd is live on the stanford campus with the rundown of what that ruling means for all of us. >> reporter: well, jessica and terry, it simply means if you are arrest bade police officer and he has probable cause, he can search your purse, your briefcase, your pockets, but he cannot touch your cell phone. he will now need a search warrant for that. this is a bold move, and a message for those paying close attention to privacy rights. nine members of the u.s. supreme court have a variety of opinions. today we found out that they do agree on one thing. >> the old rule was when somebody is arrested, any physical item in their pocket was subject to search. the court said today that a cell phone is different. >> reporter: different because it's not just an instrument you use to verbally commute. for ma

u.s. supreme court.e goes back to argentina's financial collapse in 2001 when it was unable to pay its debts. most investors have agreed a new deal with the government accepting as little as 25 cents for every dollar spent. but a small group of u.s. hedge funds, known as hold out investors have refused and they have taken argentina to court in order to get their money. now argentina has failed in its appeals and has now been ordered to pay $1.3 billion in cash. >>> biomedical engineer in u.s. has used his expertise to help his son who has type one diabetes. he has helped to create a bionic pancreas using anism phone, sophisticated software and an automated insulin pump. the technology could change of lives of millions of people. as al jazerra's cath turner now explains from boston. >> reporter: david was just 11 month old when he was diagnosed with type one diabetes, his life and parents' lives have resolved around managing the disease. >> like this school i used to go down to the nurse's office every si

u.s. supreme court. that is the case that was heard by the supreme court in 1856 and again in 1857 when they actually rendered their decision. hiss interesting that name is on the case and he does not really come into it until 1854. he is the key player in that we know that they will be returned to slavery by the supreme court, but they were set in this room a couple of months later. state.d died in new york upon his death, the ownership of the scotts reverted to his sister and her husband who was from massachusetts. he was a member of congress at this time. suddenly, he finds he is the owner of the most famous slaves in the united states. to divest himself of these slaves as quickly as he could before the press found out. actually solds he the scott family for a token dollar to one of the sons of the original family from the plantation where scott was born back in virginia. taylor brought them into this courtroom and set them free in 1857. they achieved the freedom they had fought so long to obtain while

u.s. supreme court. they're going to rule on a provision that employers, like hobby lobby, say violates their religious beliefs, this is an interesting one to watch. we'll break it down for you. stay close. sfx: car unlock beep. vo: david's heart attack didn't come with a warning. today his doctor has him on a bayer aspirin regimen to help reduce the risk of another one. if you've had a heart attack be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. of swedish experience in insidperfecting the rich,ars never bitter taste of gevalia. we do it all for this very experience. [woman] that's good. i know right? gevalia. peace of mind is important when so we provide it services you bucan rely on. with centurylink as your trusted it partner, you'll experience reliable uptime for the network and services you depend on. multi-layered security solutions keep your information safe, and secure. and responsive dedicated support meets your needs, and eases your mind. centurylink. your link to what's ne

supreme court draws the line on abortion protest. how far is too far to make the voice heard? good evening. >> u.s. supreme court ruled a buffer zone violates the first amendment. san francisco law allows protestors to get a bit closer, 25 feet, and other cities have similar restrictions now, the question, are those still legal? we're live now in the mission with the story. vic? >> this is the ruling that struck down the massachusetts law, that 35-foot buffer zone the court ruled it was too broad. now, san francisco filed a brief as friend of the court to support the ordinance. now, by the way in front of the planned parenthood clinic on valencia. that is the zone the city imposed against protests here. now, the question is, it's ten feet smaller but does it violate the law? abortion opponents target the clinic in the mission, standing behind an arc painted around the entrance. this after the board of supervisors approved the buffer zone. opponents maintain any buffer violates their freedom of speech. protestors say it limits them to the sidewalk. >> can san francisco, this 25 foot zone was an arc i

u.s. supreme court on protests outside of abortion clinics could put a law in limbo.hy 0 feet could make a difference. plus... >> we're getting reports your son has been found in your basement. >> a stunning moment on national tv. the questions now being asked about a 12-year-old boy's 0-day disappearance. and... >> the father of the sabt santa barbara shooter speaking about the nightmare he's now living and how he tried to help his oh i knew i forgot something... i'll just do it now. well, we're boarding. no, i'll use citi mobile. takes two seconds, better safe than sorry right? yeah who knows if we'll even get service on the islands? what! no service? seriously? no electricity, we're going to make our own candles, we're going to churn our own butter. oh, we lost one. can't leave a bag unattended. bank from almost anywhere with the citi mobile app. to learn more visit citi.com/easierbanking >>> today the u.s. supreme court ruled a 35-foot buffer zone barring protestors from abortion clinics violates the first amendment. >> now wondering how that ruling might affect t

u.s. supreme court. several locations in the bay area including this store here in morgan hill. people on both sides of the issue at the supreme court awaiting the decision which will be delivered at any time now. back in march when the court heard the case protestors came out as the justices heard oral arguments. >> real healthcare respects life! >> birth control is under attack, what do we do? >> stand up fight back! >> reporter: hobby lobby of oklahoma is leading the lawsuit against the government arguing that being forced to pay for contraception violates its religious beliefs. some in congress agree. >> i think the statute itself as interpreted by the president violates the first amendment of the constitution and i'm hoping the court will uphold the rights of individuals for their expression of their religious freedoms. >> reporter: but other lawmakers support the white house argument that insurance coverage for birth control must be included in health plans and is critical to women's health. >> the

u.s. supreme court ruling against buffer zones around the boston clinics are going to affect those. esterday the nation's highest court shot down a massachusetts law requires protesters to stay at least 35 feetd away from clinics. the court decided the law violated first amendment rights. now lawyers are taking another look at a similar buffer zone law approved in san francisco just last year. >>> it is 6:32 right now, time to check the forecast as we give you a live look outside this morning. taking a peek at downtown san jose. that's that marine layer christina was telling us about. she has a look this morning. >> it's thick out there which is a good sign for us who live in the inlands. i can tell you right now it is going to be hot as we get into the second half of the weekend into next week. but because of though low clouds that you see, it's going to be really, really comfortable, even through the hot spots. typically this time of year ant tri-valley we hit the mid-80s, today we're likely going to stay in the upper 70s, a couple cities will break into the low 80s at best. i can

u.s. supreme court ruled that the broadcast t.v. d.v.r. service area is basically a legal an area has seized operation as a result so is this decision controversial and will it have a chilling effect on innovation. it's an interesting decision because you're really talking about whether or not there you have the right to provide something publicly and yet license for it privately the us has always held out that broadcast television had to be provided free in exchange for providing the airwaves to broadcasters that was kind of the deal that if you're going to go out you're going to use this spectrum which is highly valuable which the u.s. government could charge any number of for it's going to provide broadcast television you should provide it for free so they can reach everybody and if you provide valuable services like news for years broadcasters have charged cable companies billions of dollars for these streams for allowing them to put it over the cable channels too so people didn't lose their local programming when they subscribe to cab

u.s. supreme court issued a landmark ruling: >>> the question was not whether kids could be locked up for life, that, according to the supreme court is per missable. the question was whether it was mandatory, or whether judges and juries should be allowed to consider mitigating factors like a person's role in a crime or a person's upbringing. patricia's son works for the center or juvenile law and policy and is adelfo's attorney. >> at the time of the sentence no court considered the use or the characteristics that come with youth, the facts of the pacific role that they play in the offense. >> on this point the u.s. supreme court was clear - a child's circumstances matter, and it's cruel and unusual punishment to impose mandatory life sentences on them. >> the question is whether is applies retroactively, to all the old cases. >> reporter: adolfo's fate is in the hands of the illinois court, where he's making the case that it does apply to old cases. if he's success. he will open the door for 100 other cases in the united states. >> a couple of courts come down on the side of retro activi

u.s. supreme court and we won 5-4. when a federal court appeals struck down the pledge of allegiance because it included one nation under god, we went to the supreme court defending pledge of allegiance and we won unanimous. when a federal court in california struck down the veterans memorial a 70-year-old monument a lone white latent crop to the men and women who gave their lives in world worl, we won 5-4. today, the threats to religious liberty are even greater. i want to talk about them both here and out home and abroad. here at home, we have an i.r.s. who is asking citizen groups, tell me what books you're reading. tell me the content of your prayers. they tell you something, federal government has no business asking any american content of our prayers. last year in alaska, an air force chaplain posted on his blog, the phrase there are no atheist in fox hole. he was ordered to take that down. i guess it was deemed inintensive to atheist. i kind of thought it was the job of chaplains to be insensitive to atheist. ca

u.s. supreme court unanimously ruled police need a warrant to search a person's cell phone. even in the case someone is under arrest. telford calls it a huge win for privacy rights. >> financial information, and something concerning my job i don't want you to share it. >> reporter: a powerful device unlike anything else police could find on someone should they pull them over. the fact about technology now allows an individual to carry such information in his hand does not make the information any less worthy of the protection for which the founders fought. but roberts also acknowledged the ruling could include police security. >> police that had a rash reaction and do something to protect their community and want to act right how. >> reporter: it was compared to a home, house or computer. all of which police are required to get a warrant first. jaqueline fell, ktvu news. >> the supreme court ruled on two cases. >>> a four legged hero. >> i rescued her a few months ago, now she rescued me. >> how he says his dog saved his life. >>> and why a particular roadway is notorious fo

u.s. supreme court ruled against someone buying a gun for someone else.he later transferred it to his uncle in eastern north hampton county. they said tha that the gun was r him only. >>> general kenneth dal is investigating into the prison swap last month. he's treated in an animal medical hospital in texas. >>> "world news with diane sawyer" has more on the investigation of bowe bergdahl's capture. you can watch it at 6:00. >>> new jersey and pennsylvania and delaware are among 13 east coast states that share a $100 million grant protecting against major storms. it will fund a variety of projects of risks against big stormlation superstorm sandy. there is restoration of beaches, assault marcs and urban areas. new york has the second most projects. >>> one the latest lures in the grocery aisle, named natural. it's a better choice. a consumer report survey found that 59% look for foods labeled natural when they shop. as alicia vitarelli she is us it's just a claim. >>> the consumer reports shopsmart says be aware it doesn't always mean what you think. >>

u.s. supreme court decision striking down school prayer was in 1962. so, the historically important barry goldwater did not really deal with those issues, and in 1980 actually ran as a pro-life candidate. it was not until the latter part that he developed this antagonism toward the social right and its influence on the republican party. then, the third phase of his career, rather than cuddily, i would say an iconic curmudgeon. cuddilyerly -- curmudgeon. >> he was an historically important figure, and the american people, over time, developed an affection for those iconic characters, those important historical figures, even if they were busy denouncing them at the time that actually had some degree of political importance. >> so they are remembering the .eriod -- the later period michael, you follow these closely. you agree with the? -- with that? >> i think he nailed it. there are several phases. if there is something i can pick saying,at david was with rand paul, barry goldwater could speak with incredible self-righteousness which was noted in "the ma

u.s. court rulings that ordered it to pay $1.3 billion to the funds. but the supreme court refused to hear the appeal without giving a reason why. the top u.s. court also upheld the claim of the investment funds and ordered the argentine government to disclose the location of its assets overseas. now if argentina fails to pay off its debts it could face a new default, dealing a blow to the country's credibility in financial markets. >>> people running general motors are telling more people to return their cars to the dealers. they've issued a recall for more than 3 million vehicles because of faulty ignition switches are that brings the number recalled this year to more than 20 million. executives say the affected vehicles include flagship sedans sold mainly in north america. investors have been looking into problems with ignition switches. dweks have been linked to the deaths of at least 13 people. in february allegations emerged that the automaker had covered up the policemen for more than a decade. gm officials have announced more than 30 recalls since the beginnin

u.s. supreme court decision that orders argentina one $.5reditors billion. it puts argentina and its president in a difficult position. they can either pay up or potentially risk another default on debt like they had in 2001. luke brown has more. >> 14 years after its economy was brought to the brink, the --dows of fresh that default of fresh debt default hangover argentina. billion.$1.5 like the majority of creditors, they have refused to agree to debt restructuring over the last decade. this latest setback drew a defiant response from the president. >> any government in any country directed in the areas of policy making need to be openly negotiating. --president can expect subject his country or his people to extortion. lead toing to pay could another technical default, potentially as early as the end of the month. president kirchner warned it could bump the man's for payment -- demands for payments up to half of the rnc reserves. currency reserves. >> the problem is that those who --ept did the restructuring accepted the restructuring would be able to go

u.s. supreme court is pending. in that case, it's challenging the interior department's decision to allow the oyster farm's permit to expire which it actually did in 2012. drakes bay says the supreme court could decide by monday whether to take that case at all. >> hard to believe it's going to go all the way to the supreme court of the united states. >> if they decide to take it. >> thank you. >>> it is the home of the oakland a's and everyone thought it would be for the next 10 years. but tonight, nobody is quite sure what's going to happen. kpix 5's da lin is at the coliseum. da, the city threw the team a curve ball today. right? >> reporter: yeah, veronica. oakland leaders don't like the deal because they want more money, fans don't like the deal because they think the a's extension would push the raiders out. county leaders aren't happy because they can't vote on a deal. today everybody is angry. both fans -- >> i made the trip here at 4 in the morning from sacramento to oppose this deal. >> reporter: and oakla

u.s. supreme court is due to release its final two decisions of the year on monday. the case drawing the most attention isc is is he billous versus hobby lobby store. the owner of hobby lobby says providing contraceptives would violate his beliefs. it's all part of "a deeper look right here on al jazeera america. >> good saturday to you. i'm eboni deon tracking the flood across the midwest. we have a number of warning advisories. the risk of flash flooding across north dakota. as you can see here on our satellite radar there is a lot of rain across the dakotas. further south we have been watching a cluster of storms moving from east to west across northern areas of oklahoma, and it looks like now into parts of kansas we're namely in the clear. we can see storms firing up later today. this is taken from a storm chaser in wallace county. you're seeing a gust that bricks up debris and can cause quite a bit of damage. although short-lived it can cause the damage equivalent to an ef-0 tornado. off to the east we have heavy rainfall and stronger storms as we get into the a

u.s. supreme court is expected to hand down that decision today.vails, critics say it could result in tomorrow's civil rights disaster. hobby lobby already covers birth control for its employees. its issue is with requirement in obama care to cover emergency contraception as well. the company objects to four drugs, the morning after pill, plan b, ella, and two forms of iuds. hobby lobby says these drugs are potentially life-terminating, although there is no scientific basis for that assertion. but hobby lobby is taking no chances. it is lobbying its position on youtube. >> the green family has no objection to providing 16 of the 20 fda approved drugs and devices, providing four of the drugs and devices that have the potential to terminate a life conflicts with their faith. >> this is an issue of life, we cannot be a part of taking life. to be in a situation where our government is telling us we have to be is incredible. >> joining me are gloria brown marshall, a constitutional law professor and cnn vatican analyst john allen. good morning. >> good

u.s. supreme court handed down a landmark ruling about contraception and a set back for the at theing careaw. 5-4 the court ruled the law cannot require closely-held companies to pay for contraceptives for employees. oklahoma-based arts and crafts chain, hobby lobby, claimed religious objectses to the law. it is the first time that the court ruled that profit-seeking businesses can hold religious views under federal law it can be a template for other challenges to the health care law. more on this key decision coming up tonight beginning at 4:00. >>> two people hurt when a septa trolley and minivan collided during the morning rush at baltimore avenue and 55th street in west philadelphia. the route 34 trolley traveling westbound when the minivan ran a red light and ran into the side of the trolley. two people, one inside of the trolley were injured and taken to the hospital at the university of pennsylvania for treatment. >>> learning what sparked a fire in delaware leaving a driver seriously injured. the state fire marshal's office said travis paul smith threw a lit cigarette out of the wi

u.s. supreme court, which case will be up next on the docket.know we will be coming across this time and time again. coming up, john lloyd young from jersey boys, a conversation and performance. stay with us. for anyone of a certain age the name frankie valley and the four seasons conjures up a lot of times. the story of the band became a block west are starring john lloyd -- blockbuster starring john lloyd young, who won a tony. he has three private the role for the movie version. he will perform for the close of the show. i will look at a scene from directed by clint eastwood. >> a voice like yours is a gift from god. the word is going to hear that voice. >> sure. it's just i wish things would start to happen. >> impatient. don't worry, you work hard, everything works. these days either a movie becomes a broadway hit or a broadway hit the comes a movie. make of it? >> it seems less likely a broadway hit the comes a movie, especially on broadway. i think it's great when a good broadway show makes it on the screen well. certainly i know how rare

u.s. supreme court has said that a corporation can claim that it has religious views that give it exemption from certain laws. now, the court specifically addresses the argument that the government made here. it's the corporation that provides the insurance coverage not the people who own it. and therefore, a corporation can't have religious views. that corporations are set up to be legally separate from their owners. well, the supreme court says about that that congress designed this law, the religious freedom law we've been talking about here to provide very broad protections for religious liberty and did not intend to require business people to make a choice between their religious believes on the one hand and the protections of using the corporate form on the other. in other words, they say you can have both. it said the whole point of this law is to protect the rights of the people associated with the corporations including shareholders, officers, and employees. it says protecting the freedom of religion rights of closely-held corporations protects the religious liberty of the humans w

supreme court. a decision made on areo. american broadcasting companies. and what we have heard. the u.s. eme court ruled that areo, the internet service that offers local broadcast tv channels is operating in a manner that violates federal law. so the decision coming out of the u.s. supreme court. it is ruled areo operating in a manner that violates federal law. it's a company that pulls tv network tv broadcasts off the air waives and extreme it is to online users. they charge the users for a monthly fee. the issue at question is whether a company publicly performs a copy righted program when it retransmits a broadcast to the thousands of paid subscribers. areo operating in a manner that violates federal law. this just in to msnbc. our justice correspondent pete williams will be here shortly as he was in the courtroom listening to this. he'll be getting to a camera very soon. i want to note for the areo case msnbc parent case is among the becau broadcasting cable companies on copy wright claims before the supreme court. we'll have more on msnbc. >>> still trying to hold on to the largest