u.s. u.k. finland and sweden, and they aren't even nato members. from the bridge they could look out to sea the contributions from several other countries. the russian fleet is out there as well. but they're not on speaking terms with each other. >> i think russians are watching. we're neighbors of russia. russia is not that far away. it's a neighbor of poland. clearly they're watching us. clearly they're interested in what we're doing but this is routine business, and we should not be worried about that. >> the u.s. has already said that it's shipping out huge amounts of military hardware, and next week it's likely to be announced that troops will follow. in the russian enclave, russia said that it will speed up the ballistic missiles. the question is what is defense and what is aggression. from nato's point of view this is all about openness and moral authority. it's a complicated world and it's not always easy to figure out who is a friend whoop isn't. but in all this the wednesday of the baltic states, it believes it can offer moral legitimacy

u.s. u.k. finland, sweden and they aren't even nato members.ge they could see contribution from other countries. >> i think the russians are watching. russia isn't that far away. it's a neighbor of poland clearly they are watching us but this is routine business, and we shouldn't be worried about that. >> reporter: the u.s. has already said it is shipping in huge amounts of military hardware. equally just down the coast, moscow says it will speed up the placements of ballistic missiles. the question is what is defense and what is aggression. from nato's point of view this is all about openness and moral authority. it's a complicated world nowadays and for many western nations it's not easy to figure out who is a friend and who isn't? but in all of this nato really seems to believe it can offer moral legitimacy over russia. so is all of this an unnecessary provocation of the russians? >> i think every nation has a right to exercise, to make sure they have military skills and what you see in nato is absolute transparency. we announce our exercise

u.s. u.k. finland and sweden - they are not n.a.t.o. members. from the bridge they could look out to see contributions from other countries, the russian fleet is out there as well. they are not on speaking terms with each other. >> russia is watching we are neighbours of russia they are not far away. clearly they are watching us they are interested in what we are doing, it's routine business, and we shouldn't worry about that. the u.s. is shipping in hardware from central europe. troops will follow. down the coast, the russian enclave, moscow will speed up the placement of ballistic missiles. the question is what is defense, what is aggression. from n.a.t.o.'s point of view this is about open possess and moral authority. it's a complicated world. for many western nations it's not easy to figure out who is a friend and who isn't. in all this the defense of the baltic states n.a.t.o. seems to believe it can offer moral legitimacy over russia. so is all this an unnecessary provocation of the russians. >> i think that every nation has a right to exe

u.s. u.k. finland and sweden, and they're not even nato members. from the bridge they could look out to see the contributions from several other countries. the russian fleet is out there as well, but they're not on speaking terms with each other. >> i think russians are watching. we're neighbors of russia. russia is not that far away. it's a neighbor of poland. clearly they're watching us. clearly they're interested in what we're doing but this is business, and we should not be worried about that. >> the u.s. said its shipping in huge amounts of military hardware. it's easy to assume that troops will follow. the crucial question is what is defense and what is aggression? from nato's point of view this is all about openness and it's about moral authority. it's a complicated world nowadays and for many western nations it's not easy to figure toes figure out who is a friend and who isn't. but in all this they believe they can offer moral legitimacy over russia. >> is this all necessary provocation of the russians? >> i any every nation has a right to

u.s. u.k. finland and sweden, and they're not even nato members.rom the bridge they could look out to sea the contributions from several other countries. the russian fleet is out there well, but they're not on speaking terms with each other. >> i think the russians are watching. we're neighbors of russia. neighbors of poland. clearly they're watching us. clearly they're interested in what we're doing but this is business we shouldn't be worried about that. >> the u.s. has already said that it's shipping in huge amounts of military hardware and then troops will follow. moscow said that it will speed up the placement of of strategic miles. >> from nato's point of view this is all about openness and moral authority. it's a complicated world nowadays and for many western nations it's not easy to figure out who is a friend and who isn't. but in all this the defense of the baltic scene they believe they can offer moral legitimacy over russia. so is all this an unnecessary provocation of the russians? >> i think that every nation has a right to exercise,

u.s. u.k. as well as finland and sweden and they aren't even nato members.could see the contribution from several other countries. the russian fleet was out there as well but they are not on speaking terms. >> russia is a neighbor of poland. clearly they are watching us and interested in what we are doing, but this is routine business, and we shouldn't be worried. >> reporter: next week it is likely to be announced that troops will follow equipment. moscow says it will speed up the placementings of ballistic missiles. the question is what is defense and what is aggression? from nato's point of view this is about openness and moral authority. for many western nations it's not easy to figure out who is a friend and who isn't? but in all of this the defense of the baltic states nato really seems to believe it can offer moral legitimacy over russia. so is all of this an unnecessary provocation of the russians. >> every nation has the right to exercise and make sure they have military skills and what you see in nato is transparency. we announce our exercises, we

would be a first in the u.s., only two nations in the entire world has no federal law with paid paternity leave. in iceland fathers get 90 days paid leave and finland 54. in the u.k., 14. many companies offer their own paid paternity leave. in fact, facebook is one of the most generous, offering 17 weeks today time off. google and bank of america each offer 12. most companies don't offer anything at all. in the u.s., only four states guarantee paid family leave for moms or dads. that's california, rhode island, and new jersey. morgan radford, al jazeera. >> scott beason is a professor of management and author of the working dad's survival guide. boy, do they need that, guys. thanks for being here. virgin's new policy only affected 140 employees and only those in london and geneva. what impact do you think it will have on the conversation? >> as you say the policy i also not quite as widespread as perhaps the first amount of publicity has indicated but i think sends an important signal that a company can be very successful financially and also be supportive of families and not just of working women but also of working dads, who are parents, too and also need suppo