the fact that the u.s.s. monterey is now in the black sea region is in fact a threat to the russian national security and and some way a violation of the agreements reached between washington in moscow and moscow over the new missile defense plan in europe. clearly the russian foreign ministry is unhappy about the decision to make the u.s.s. monterey one of the key figures in the nato war game seabreeze war games in the desk and obviously they want their voice of concern to be heard in washington so far we've had no comments coming from the american side on this taken by the russian foreign ministry i like they tell us more about what you know about its role in washington's planned anti-missile shield. well we heard many stories about of the agreements between russia and us and the united states on the missile defense shield we know that there was in the original plan worked out by george w. bush administration it was scrapped by the obama administration when he came to office in two thousand and nine and there seem t

that the u.s.s. monterey was moved from the american coast to the mediterranean as part of the new missile defense shield in europe worked out by the obama administration in two thousand and nine but the question which raises eyebrows in the russian foreign ministry and that was published in the statement earlier on sunday that there is as long as there is no violent conflict in the black sea region why is the ship the u.s.s. monterey docks in at the desa harbor to take part in the nato war games it is especially bewildering given the fact that all the previous seabreeze war games in order have seen only small u.s. u.s. ships take part in these war games of the russian foreign ministry says that this. the fact that the u.s.s. monterey is now in the black sea region is in fact a threat to the russian national security and in some way a violation of the agreements reached between washington in moscow and moscow over the new missile defense plan in a europe the initial plan of the george w. bush administration o

fact out of the u.s.s. monterey is now in the black sea region is in fact a threat to the russian national security and unsound way a violation of the agreement reached between washington in moscow and moscow over the new missile defense plan in europe the initial plan of the george w. bush administration of missile defense shield in europe was scrapped by the obama administration in two thousand and nine and you plan was proposed and agreed between russia and nato but what we've seen so far which we've been seeing recently described by the russian foreign ministry and many experts as a situation when words do not match actions now first we've had american patriot missiles dispatched in the polish town off more on now we've heard furthermore plans of building radio locations stations in romania and turkey and in poland so all this. according to the russian foreign ministry is not something discussed between presidents refuted and obama between russia and nato so clearly the war of words continues and it is interesti

this american warship the u.s.s. monterey carries a high tech and sophisticated and to marseille system called ages and indeed according to the plan of the pentagon worked out several years ago that ships of the u.s.s. monterey's class could be moved to the black sea coast in case of an escalating conflict we understand that the us has monterrey was moved from the american coast to the mediterranean as part of the new missile defense shield in europe worked out by the obama administration in two thousand and nine but the question which raises eyebrows in the russian foreign ministry and that was published in the statement earlier on sunday that there is as long as there is no violent conflict in the black sea region why is the east ship the u.s.s. monterey docks at the desa harbor to take part in the nato war games it is especially if you will during given the fact that all the previous seabreeze war games in i have seen only small u.s. u.s. ships take part in these war games of the russian foreign ministry says that this. th

from moscow and claims it's a prelude to the planned nato missile defense shield for europe the u.s.s. monterey docked in odessa at a joint military exercises in the area. next artie's daniel bushell sits down with french far right leader marine le pen who's taken over from her famous some say infamous father who ran for the presidency five times and of next year's presidential elections in france she shared her views on the country's politics. to win an unprecedented first round victory in france this presidential elections next year she says that france is on the verge of revolution but what tuck the extra expect nicolas sarkozy to use to try and stop the winning power. but you know i don't think there is a risk of a person a sincere and a fan's he's a her own ideas there is no reason to warry the greatest danger in connection with nicolas sarkozy so he may again do what he did in two thousand and seven namely make a number of extremely tough statements regarding threats regulation of immigration process and european protectionism but those statements will remain what they are just further bi

from moscow and claims it's a prelude to the planned nato missile defense shield for europe the u.s.s. monterey docked in odessa ahead of joint military exercises in the area. up next are you with nato secretary general anders fogh rasmussen an interview he gave this week to our he's a nice and now way he defended the alliances actions in libya and insisted the organization has no plans to act in syria stay with us. thank you very much for joining us here on our t.v. it's much appreciated i want to get straight to our first question the u.k. and france want a u.n. security council resolution condemning the syrian government in your opinion are we heading for libya two point zero here you know i would like to stress nato has no intention whatsoever to intervene in syria at the same time lots of critics expect that that could be the case if we see a resolution russell saying that the fact that it's even being debated is going to cause more violence in syria. there might be some kind of intervention do you think not if the u.n. goes head and goes ahead rather and approves that resolution once agai