and of course, this is not a new phenomenon either, because we have had the uafs coming into the airspacetake them down. >> and so it sounds like he is downplaying a threat here, and saying they are benign and not new. what do you think? >> what he is saying is that in according to to administration, with the two objects that they shot down they were within 20,000 feet which is a hazard to civilian aircraft which they should take them down, and as to what they are exactly, we have to look at the wreckage and then come to the conclusions. >> are people taking too much of the objects in the air and objects shot down, and now, congressman turner says that the administration is trigger happy. >> no, i don't think that we are overly concerned, and we should be concerned about these particular objects, and the question is what is the nature of the objects. that is where we need to, again, let the administration do its homework and provide us with correct information before we make judgments. one thing is for sure, when we sigh them over our airspace, that is a threat, and so looking at the capa