efficacy,ubt on the the legitimacy of voting methods.asserting very clearly for our users that, for instance , voting by mail is a trustworthy way of voting in the election. emily: how concerned are you about election night, that the results could be contested, that there could be chaos? how much of a risk does facebook face? nick: i think it is a very real risk. many more people are likely understandably in a pandemic to vote by mail and mail ballots tend to be counted later than in person but -- in person votes. there is likely to be a discrepancy between the immediate picture and what happens in the days and weeks following it. we will be starting very soon using our voting information center very actively in people's feeds, constantly repeating to people that this time they should not expect an immediate result. people should be accustomed to the idea that it might take quite a bit longer. candidateswhere declare victory before the results of the election are certified, we will label that to make sure that our users know that those d

i really ubt th.w, i'm not even sure e russn esidt remembers that i exist at this poin and stly from my persctive, that's for the bestw, it's such a stgeringeturon vement. and when we look at this d in hiory, september 11th, this is a remier of the fact.only what what has happened in the decades since. and whether you're talking about disinformation and divide in the united states or whether you're talking about a system of endless wars where we send more and more of our people and our treasure overseas to be buried in a hole, no one can do as much damage to us as our own domestic discontent. and this is why resilience is so key. terrorists can't defeat this country. you know, foreign facebook posts, they cannot destroy our elections. only we can by playing into it. >> give me the one-minute version of the truth about coronavirus in russia. what haven't we been allowed to see over here? >> i don't think it's like there's some buried secret. it's bad here as it's bad in many places in the world. what h

they were is ubt to being charged with homicide. they're not being charged with any homicide crime. there will be a sense from the activists that two have gotten away with murder or sman laugter and the other officer charged with wanton endangerment is receiving a slap on the wrist. the maximum penalty is five years, many people will think that that punishment does not meet the crime in the event that the officer is convicted so -- >> paul -- >> it is a charge that's usually applied to people who shoot in the air. if a drunk driver -- >> right. >> puts other people at risk, then she is charged with wanton endangerment. it is not a crime that seems to apply to these hanks. >> paul, paul, i'm only going to slow you down because you're such a good legal analyst, you're fast. this is a lot of state law jargon. i'm going to hand you the mic back but there were potential charges against three officers and this is one out of three faces charges and that is as you put it potential charges related to killing, that is to say, a homicide or murder related charges. and none of those according t