you mentioned the ucr, that leaves it up to states. unfortunately, not all states handle it the same. >> some have incapacitation. >> absolutely. wisconsin used to be one of them. i don't know what can be done on a federal level there, but we did have a very wonderful, the department did a great job of presenting a definition of consent that talks about not only affirmative consent. you don't have to yell no. you are simply focusing on is there a yes, is there an agreement. and absent that, it can't confer consent. that's why it hurts survivors so much to say clearly it's consensual, because you didn't do x, y, z when you lived through it. that's what's missing, and it needs to exist. >> the problem is, that obviously, this is not a federal crime, unless you're on, in the district of columbia or indian reservations in some instances. you know, these crimes are state crimes. so we can't define for states elements of their crimes. >> but we can do models and incentives. >> we can. and i think that's one thing we should look at in this le