. >> we do try to push -- udat is one function of the department that looks at things with a specific eye towards urban design. that's not the only thing that goes into a project. you know, i mentioned there is a pragmatic sense. even those feasibility is not in our code, we do have to take it into account in a general sense. either there is a project that we want and support ultimately, although it may not be perfect, then we have to make that decision. >> commissioner richards: i think it would be more comfortable from a feasibility point of view if you knew it was much less feasible. i know there's a finger in the wind, here's this, here's that. if you really want to take feasibility, and we want to get a project built here. there's no question about it. we want to get a good project, i would rather see something rather than them telling me. >> well, commissioners, just keep in mind, this is part of how we have to work with applicants. there does have to be a certain amount of trust built up with the applicant, especially over a course of time. as david mentioned, david and udat, w