. -- willing to take back “udues. ,, ~ kong. -- willing to take back “udues.es. do you think that is realistic? to think china i judges. do you think that is | realistic? to think china will judges. do you think that is i realistic? to think china will then change its stance on hong kong? i don't think sanctions are a one size fits all solution and we will see me to show, but in the long term if we can look at china there is still a chance that china will change its behaviour and hong kong will return to an southern city.— to an southern city. chung ching kwon: , to an southern city. chung ching kwong, thank — to an southern city. chung ching kwong, thank you _ to an southern city. chung ching kwong, thank you very - to an southern city. chung ching kwong, thank you very much i to an southern city. chung ching i kwong, thank you very much occurring on the programme. thank you. here in the uk, there's another day of railway strikes strikes. around 40,000 members of the rmt trade union are striking. tssa members at avanti west coast are too. the rmt is striking

, one udu located at the rear of a ground floor commercial unit and address 2976 mission street. it has been vacant since 2019 and the second addresses -- it has been vacant since 1997. the buildings two ground floor commercial spaces are vacant. the proposed project would retain the buildings front facade and construct new six story, 65 foot tall mixed building with eight dwelling units and one one bedroom and the project includes a 1600 square feet ground floor commercial space and provides a significant amount of common open space in a digs to three private terraces. the project would provide eight class i and two class ii parking bicycle spaces. no off streetcar parking is proposed and the project was submitted to the department on january 1, 2020. the project is not required to replace demolished units and the project sponsor team has outreach efforts with mission and community groups. although the project is not located within the strict boundaries of the latino cultural district, the project sponsor team worked with members throughout the development and design phases of t

what the 'udue said under the carpet, really. what the judge said today — under the carpet, really.ile, it serves only to protract his death, was being unable to prolong his life. i was being unable to prolong his life. ., ., y was being unable to prolong his life. ., ., , �* was being unable to prolong his life. ., ., , i life. i totally disagree, i've said from day one. _ life. i totally disagree, i've said from day one, what _ life. i totally disagree, i've said from day one, what is - life. i totally disagree, i've said from day one, what is the i life. i totally disagree, i've said| from day one, what is the rush, life. i totally disagree, i've said i from day one, what is the rush, give him some time, this is a brain injury, children have a lot of plasticity in their brains, and the brain is an incredible thing, there are still wrist all over the world —— they are still researching the brain all over the world. although families are told all the time, they're going to be in a vegetative state, the brain—dead, there are lots of cases out there where that is just not the case. l

the 'udue has legalfees? potentially, yes. the judge has not — legalfees? potentially, yes. not said she _ legalfees? potentially, yes. the judge has not said she is - legalfees? potentially, yes. the judge has not said she is lying i legalfees? potentially, yes. the| judge has not said she is lying but the effect — judge has not said she is lying but the effect certainly is to me, yes, she is— the effect certainly is to me, yes, she is lying — the effect certainly is to me, yes, she is lying. you can be convicted for perjurv — she is lying. you can be convicted for perjury. we also have caroline watt _ for perjury. we also have caroline watt who — for perjury. we also have caroline watt who withdrew statements. if you think back _ watt who withdrew statements. if you think back to jeffrey archer, he went— think back to jeffrey archer, he went to — think back to jeffrey archer, he went to prison following a libel triai _ went to prison following a libel trial. , , ., . , ., trial. yes, but more recently, had there been _ trial. yes, but more recently, had there been other _