. ~ :, to block in'ections from european 'udues. ~ ., :, .,~ to block in'ections from european 'udueses. we have to make sure that this bill actually _ judges. we have to make sure that this bill actually does _ judges. we have to make sure that this bill actually does the _ judges. we have to make sure that this bill actually does the job. - judges. we have to make sure that this bill actually does the job. i - this bill actually does the job. i want to speak to two amendments, but one in particular. that is the one in respect of rule 39. we said at the outset of this debate that i don't believe that our membership of the european convention on human rights is sustainable. i think that will become clearer and clearer to the british public in the months and years ahead. but that is not the purpose of my amendment today. it is not the subject of this debate. that is a discussion for another day. what we are discussing here, i will give wayne a moment, but what we are discussing here is whether or not we believe it is appropriate for a foreign church in international court to impose a l

you said the 'udue be determined. you said the judge barred _ be determined.ned. you said the judge barred me and - be determined. you said the judge barred me and my i judge barred me and my colleague alluded to this, but thejudge also said colleague alluded to this, but the judge also said strict parameters. could you lay those out and whether they work? the 'ud . e out and whether they work? the 'udue did out and whether they work? tie: judge did his out and whether they work? tue: judge did his best to out and whether they work? tue judge did his best to try to keep donald trump to a yes or no answers, part of why the testimony was so short, and he did not want the former president to be using this to have an opportunity to spout off anything he wanted. he kept them on a very short leash, so to speak, with any of his answers. to speak, with any of his answere— to speak, with any of his answers. _ , to speak, with any of his answers. ,, , ., , answers. he did say - she has some outbursts _ answers. he did say - she has some outbursts like _ answers. he did

the ordinance also would waive the la cour for proposed udu removals when the udu does not currentlyhe open space or exposure requirements of the planning code, or the minimum floor to ceiling height requirements of the housing code, and so for these specific exemptions that would be eligible for multifamily buildings as well, not just single family homes like the um, first exemption, i had shared. lastly, the proposed ordinance also refines the udu removal findings to only consider the uda's tenant and eviction history from the past ten years. um, as mr. ferrer had just shared, the department has received two public comments after the packets were published, i forwarded one of them to you earlier this week. that was from miss georgia scottish. she supported the overall intent of the legislation and the two suggestions were as follows. one is related to um. if the um seeking the ci exception has a kitchen, um, she's suggesting that the kitchen cannot be removed to provide flexibility to be able to separate the units at a later date. the planning code defines as a dwelling unit, as ha

israel was always 'udued on questionable? israel was always judged on different _ questionable?was always judged on different criteria. - questionable? israel was always judged on different criteria. wel judged on different criteria. we have to admit it. it goes both ways, it goes for the bed. israel feels and is part of the west. israel is considered the only democracy in the middle east. we don't want to be compared, neitherto middle east. we don't want to be compared, neither to sudan or syria. we are something else. yes, stephen, there is a special sentiment out of there is a special sentiment out of the jewish people there is a special sentiment out of thejewish people about israel. the story of israel is a very unique one, you cannot compare it to any other country and still, nothing will make it easier for me and for any man of conscious, any person of conscious, what is going on in gaza. nothing of those things about the special case of israel, the special history of israel, obviously the barbaric attack on them. nothing of this should be forgotten. by the end of the day

the 'udue is fine, correct? that's right. the judge is looking _ fine, correct? that's right. correct? that's right. the judge is looking at six - fine, correct? that's right. the judge is looking at six other. judge is looking at six other counts, looking at it intends in terms of conspiracy, falsifying business records. but but the real thrust of this case was already decided by this ruling that the trump organisation committed fraud. what we saw actually go up after ten weeks of testimony with the attorney general raising the stakes. originally she asked for $250 million in a fine, she now wants $370 million in fines. so we'll see what thejudge has $370 million in fines. so we'll see what the judge has to say about that. she's also trying to ban trump permanently from ever doing business in new york again. what's been really interesting question, and even today we saw it, is that even though donald trump faces some real threats to his business, he's been far more focused, i would say, on his political fortunes. far more focused, i would say, on his politicalfortunes. whethe

the biggest 'udue of of the team, myself. the biggest judge of all- _ of the team, myself.f all. remind us who - of the team, myself. the biggest judge of all. remind us who can. judge of all. remind us who can enter and how can people... what's the deadline? _ enter and how can people... what's the deadline? you _ enter and how can people... what's the deadline? you can _ enter and how can people... what's the deadline? you can enter - enter and how can people... what's the deadline? you can enter by - enter and how can people... what's i the deadline? you can enter by going to the bbc website.— to the bbc website. submit your entry there- _ to the bbc website. submit your entry there. thank— you very much. stay with us here on bbc news. hello. after an extraordinarily mild sunday in the north of scotland on monday, the milder air pushed southwards, albeit with a lot of clouds and outbreaks of rain. that was how it looked in cornwall earlier on. something chillier, pushing into the north of scotland, at least for a time. you can see that colder air here on our air mass cha

be it a udu or a merger or a demolition. okay uh, unauthorized dwelling units, commissioners, of course. another important part of 317 are the undue controls. um, the framework that we have in place for udu controls is relatively new. it's a pretty big change. it represents a pretty big change from how the city used to address udas until a few years ago. the norm was that illegal units had to be removed, that that was the default position. um, in the late 20 tens, that was altered, of course, to express a strong preference and a regulatory structure that accompanies that to require generally that that unit be kept with the out being conditional use authorization. in the few cases in which you've chosen to approve that, um, so we've really turned things on their head in a good way. i promise to be quick. john is just one more slide after this. um you know, we have turned things on their head and we have made it much more difficult to remove all housing, especially unauthorized dwelling units. but it should be acknowledged tha