Ñi>> i was just going to add tht in light of the fact that we're here as colleagues of the ues(ajjp j mind the remarke concurringçó in the fabled seize case and in a concurring opinion, he reflected and meditated on the nationÑi of the separation of powers system. and i think that is a way to reflect on the relationship, Ñiwhich is obviously special ana unique relationship between article two officers and all of those who served under her leadership, and in the article 3 judiciary, but particularly the supreme court of the united states. lñu)r'k about itÑiñr is there is a conversation that is continually under way, and the advantage having a single officer in charge of the executive branch as part of the conversation is that the solicitor general has very elaborate ways to develop over time extraordinarily efficient invitations of people into the conversation. it is not simply that when he served it was just for thurgood marshall, because with all of his when the -- wisdom, was eager to know what different agencies of government fought, and that process of inviting different agencies

opportunities for -- present ue phoenix opportunities for terrorists. you don't have the t.s.a. officials there, law enforcement officers, processes passengers through these stations. we haven't provided amtrak the resources to fully fund this operation let alone the additional cost and manpower this legislation would necessary to comply. the traveling public deserves better. i'm asking each member to vote no on this rule so we can come back and get a fair rule pertaining to the traveling public. the speaker pro tempore: the gentlelady's time has expired. the gentleman from california. mr. dreier: mr. speaker, as i prepare to yield to mied good friend from alpine, utah, mr. chaffetz, i would simply say that give him two minutes which would total $15 billion of this measure based on the $7.5 billion per minute that it's costing us to do this. i'm happy to yield two minutes to our hardworking new colleague from utah. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman from utah is recognized for two minutes. mr. chaffetz: thank you, mr. speaker. thank you for yielding

now, we didn't come into the system thinking that;úe we wer going to talk about a voluntary effort.ing all of that background to be there and the work had to be done at a robust level to make sure we were hitting the mark for doctors and hospitals, we didn't come into the -- this discussion with the idea that we would propose a voluntary effort. we are supporting a legislative requirement that this get done, so we are committed to it. we intend to -- we have been supporting it. we intend to comply with it and we're very excited. in addition, we have another series of projects going where we've now started and we're moving on a state-by-state basis checking and making sure we're testing the technology, about six, seven weeks ago in ohio we introduced a portal for physicians. essentially one pipe through which all the physicians could communicate with all the health plans in the state and no longer have all these individual stickies and individual offices of folks who are doing claims payment for physicians. and it's been very enthusiastically received by the medical society. we're pa

Ñi>> i was just going to add tht in light of the fact that we're here as colleagues of the ues(ajjp jase and in a concurring opinion, he reflected and meditated on the nationÑi of the separation of powers system. and i think that is a way to reflect on the relationship, Ñiwhich is obviously special ana unique relationship between article two officers and all of those who served under her leadership, and in the article 3 judiciary, but particularly the supreme court of the united states. lñu)r'k about itÑiñr is there is a conversation that is continually under way, and the advantage having a single officer in charge of the executive branch as part of the conversation is that the solicitor general has very elaborate ways to develop over time extraordinarily efficient invitations of people into the conversation. it is not simply that when he served it was just for thurgood marshall, because with all of his when the -- wisdom, was eager to know what different agencies of government fought, and that process of inviting different agencies into the Ñiconversation in connection wih a call to

there was a lot of question about this, ue tube and how important -- and youtube and how important thatwas. >> first, let me thank the wilson center. this is where i wrote my books. it's always wonderful to come back here. and thank you, joan, for the work that you're doing, which really is filling in an enormous gap for those of us editors who are trying to fill in our news pages with really interesting and inciteful coverage with a very very limited budget. i always identify with my reporters as a former correspondent. i identified more with iason than with any of my other correspondents. i wanted to be there on the streets with him in iran. i was experiencing, watching it on television, seeing images on facebook, twitter and so on and almost felt like i was there with him the whole time that this was going on. obviously, not the part in prison. although that was a pretty dreadful experience even on our side trying to get him out and trying to figure out what the right words were that we needed to say that impress the iranian government that he was no threat to them and that he was ac

÷ue and content coming from the television -- my guess would be 99% of it would be copyrighted materials.fñt only are they facilitating this, they are in some ways encouraging it, and that's part of the problem we have and that's why when our pay-per-view starts, you have 271 streams. >> mr. fertitta, would you put that document in the record? will you make it available to the committee for that purpose? and i'd ask unanimous consent that it be made part of the record. >> without objection. >> and mr. chairman, if i might have forbearance to ask, i know my time has expired to ask professor yoo you've heard this discussion of notice of takedown, what can can done to make sure that content owners are doing their due diligence to make sure the claims they allege are valid? we've heard from you, some other ideas which i think are -- have merit in terms of making their ability to protect their content stronger and more immediate, which is effectively the environment they're operating in with this type of -- what can we do to make sure that people don't use this in an abusive way? i can understan

but the mission to develop an effective ansf faces ue nookly complex problems.'s remarkably difficult, uniquely difficult i should say operating environment. illiteracy is in excess of 70%. extensive poverty and related endemic corruption are a pervasive reality. outside of the national and regional capitals of kabul, kandahar, irat, gardez, there is still relatively little infrastructure to support widely dispersed army and police operations. buildings if they exist at all are often little more than mud huts. the transportation system is marginal. and severe weather conditions make building or even accessing remote mountain bases virtually impossible during the winter. wind roads can be built to supply military and police bases and outposts. much of the construction material including cement has to be brought in from outside the country. any piece of land suitable for construction for a new army or police facility or base first has to be demined. and then conflicting claims of ownership among sometimes numerous competing individuals and families can delay proje

into the record these letters from almost a dozen leaders from catholic and protestant faiths like the ue into thed church of christ and the national association of evangelicals, a letter from two dozen national and local public interest, civil rights, and local groups. another letter from the leadership conference on civil rights, and finally a letter from the national federation of community broadcasters and prometheus radio project, all of whom strongly support the local community radio act. mr. speaker, the time has come for congress to rewrite the law. the time has come to make the airwaves available to the people they serve. the time has come to bring low power to the people. i ask my colleagues to support the local community radio act and i yield back the balance of my time. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman yields back the balance of his time. the gentleman from nebraska. mr. terry: thank you, mr. speaker. appreciate your efforts, mr. doyle. mr. doyle mentioned the variety of religious organizations that support this and i found the same thing in my community and i want to yi