war of words on missile defense has been calling on for quite some time now between russia and the uighurs with washington saying we need powerful interceptors against a potential attack from some dangerous state usually named iran or north korea and moscow saying why do you need interceptors for weapons that those rogue states don't have what we do so it's against russia the russians knew america's missile defense plans as an attempt to push that very precious parity principle that was said in the start treaty and now the federation of american scientists come up with a report that looks seem to russia's concerns and i'm joined by bottom of that very thought of ration thank you very much for joining me dr but thank you very much for that so from what i understand russians are not against all interceptors they are against the more advanced and the more capable wise could you expand on that well we started the study a couple of months ago to look into the technical side of what might be behind russia's concerns so there's not a tip in the west has been that russia is ideologically opposed t

are caught up in that war in tripoli go unnoticed in the international community but here in the uighurs it seems the voices of the majority of americans those who oppose the u.s. military involvement in libya also go unnoticed by the white house the administration continues to stress the cost that they pursuing leiby of but some analysts say the administration also seems to be in denial when it comes to the will of their own people regarding the issue as well as constitutional procedures legal experts say there is not much congressman can do to force the president to comply at least with the u.s. constitution because there are ways to get around ways the obama administration seems to be using extensively most congressmen now criticize president obama for as they say ignoring congress but capitol hill observers say it's mostly political games that the lawmakers are playing to score points by snubbing the president come the day to actually vote the majority of them will vote for more military spending as they always do but there is a small bipartisan group of congressmen ten people in it