broke out in ukrinform, a state agency where, as it turned out, for some time the former head of ukrenformeksiy. matsuka sent out the darkmen. these are documents that were recommendations to who should comment and who should not comment on various events. and we are not talking about military censorship, we are talking about ordinary censorship. at one time, such dungeons were introduced in ukraine from the arrival of russian political technologists in the team of viktor medvedchuk, who at that time was the head of the administration of the president of ukraine, in the early 2000s, i remember this time very well, well, i looked at these temniks, they were made by the erasers of those distant times and very reminiscent of these dark ones. ms. yevgenia, in your humanitarian and information policy committee, have you already considered the question of what actually happened in ukrinform, whether there is a fact of censorship, whether there is a fact of interference in its work by journalists from the outside. now former heads of ukrinform and who actually created these documents that were pu

, specifically in ukrenform we are talking about this, because this is the most recent example, so wenot to go after the dark ones, that's in principle. but they chose the path without censorship, in relation to the actual cases when someone there forgets that ukraine has gone through a rather difficult path since kochniai times, from the movement without censorship, through the creation of a competitive and a free enough media market, and is trying to implement some recommendations on who to invite, how to cover, then of course it is... this is at least 171 articles of the criminal code, obstructing the activities of journalists, in ukrinform, in principle, we will raise this issue before the ministry of culture and information policy has in general, the supervisory board, which can be appealed to in case of such situations, from our side, as from the committee, i know that colleagues and iryna gerashchenko here, rostyslav can confirm, turned to the actual general office of the prosecutor general. the office of the general prosecutor has transferred this case to the kyiv city prosecu

there a fact of interference in the work of journalists with on the part of the former heads of ukrenformwho produced these documents that were published last week in ukrainian pravda. well, to us, to us team. did not request that we consider this issue, we are open to cooperation with the new head of ukrainform, and i spoke about this as the head of the information policy subcommittee with our head of the committee, that it would be good to have a meeting with the newly appointed head of ukrainform to talk about all those questions that, of course, concern not only deputies, but journalists and society in general. however, i would not compare this situation with... medvedchuk in particular, because even the very fact that you are asking these questions, that this article by ukrpravda came out, that we see this sharp reaction of society and the rejection of any signs where it is written, i don't know, unwanted speakers, people who don't have water supply, or what was on these plates, and this is also a certain criterion, and democracy, it is, well, well, being built, and... all the pillar

yanina, this story with ukrenform shows that ukraine has problems with freedom of speech and, accordinglylems with democracy. as in the conditions of war and the immutability of power until ending the war, preserving democracy in ukraine? do not be silent, the fact that we are doing this on the air now means that we are expressing our position and disagreement with the tools that the authorities use to limit freedom of speech, and the more such tools there are, and i think you all noticed that as only journalists do investigations, or we talk on the air about manifestations of injustice in relation to veterans, to their families, it immediately becomes a matter of concern and the issues are resolved by... quickly, we have a story with vitaly there shumei, who was offered in the state in which he is now, you have probably heard this story, to come, undergo vlk, a person with half of his skull missing travels to different countries of the world, is treated, he was offered with his father vlk to come, go through in order to receive help , this is for you to understand the processes that are

whether there is a fact of interference in... the work of journalists by the now former heads of ukrenformho produced these documents that were published last week in ukrainian pravda. well, our team did not ask us to consider this issue, we are open to cooperation with the new head of the team, and i she said this as the head of the information policy subcommittee. and with our head of the committee.

rostyslav, well... that's what happened in ukrenform, v in principle, probably, if there had been nothe publicity of this event would have been much wider, and yes, some people think, well, god knew, maybe censorship during the war, military censorship can be, and it is necessary, we understand that, but civilian censorship, censorship, when they say take this speaker for commenting, don't take that one, cover this event, this event... don't cover it, in your opinion, if karandeev didn't know about it, could it have been the artistic amateur act of the former leader ukrinform, well, actually, maybe it's all on it will stop, look, thank you for the question about censorship, because here you really need to understand, because there are a lot of such general judgments that go against the law, because if you don't know. how to do it according to the law, paragraph one, the constitution of ukraine clearly states that the constitution says that censorship in ukraine is prohibited, full stop, there is no civil, military, military, gendarmerie, no, it is prohibited that censorship, which, i