explain specifically by the person of a particular remarque or a particular akunin or a particular ulitskayaaphies. losses in crimea, that is, accordingly, two annexations of crimea two years later, there is also her participation , which she never admitted. bull to israel and they explained that it is better. after all , you all here accepted christianity from this narrative, then a new council of israelis was growing. well, that's already the case it's more convenient yes well of course yes but no but there and not here that is the stage of convenience it is spread over this territory to which these people do not have the right so what is the focus and it is also connected with ukraine and this is already imperial , forgive me that is, uh, that is, but in order to save yourself the trouble, it means not to start every time in the extra russistic studio , let them be there. i apologize, that means they live and graze separately, eh, and in the end, not immediately, but i found a fairly universal formula. why this should not be done, no matter how good it is liberal means also, in principle,