certainly thesef there beg one ultite truth, it's polyeistic certainly in theense of at truei expreediñfeong ristnwho practiced hindui hi a sufism ea for 10ea.n lmost 90 añd t deaf, and still e añt reldi. n heelp meake sense g? >>you kñow in e st century y h.g. wel he w, "ds d kes see?",e groad añd sc, t else!"i k at's rht on theark. wi g in ac thepiecesf the jigsawe fit togeer wve a nomic view, wxich isutiful andwesome. >scientists would are that thnew science of physicsd cosÑy ve anincrsingowerl picture of how the world w crte a tt if aa peatural factor,itrings prlebee how doupertwral power tect with a phical world? >>we, i st xe toe y feelin a say o hell with ." ormoreeraty, "wt do they ow?" threolutelybrilt iñ their fie t they get t of itoñ'tnow what gscnce s to dl with wtmes tos h owr sensesmostht. t 's an cole wor.as ever seeñ tught. bodç ever se a feeli. plats a yi"trutx is beyo words. to be trcmittedlike lht fa leapg am >hston is ptiv i'd ve to jo j but bat his clm at a Ñajor religns are true. i ne a de ofkeptic and etyrin fl,i visit michael ermee blher of tic gazine. weeet mils

ultitely, assuming ownership again. that could givthe state a cash infusion of more tn $700 million. paul? >> paul: that uld qualify, i assume, as a capital gain. >> very, very cute. it's prey amazing whe you consider the statef the real estatearket in phoenixs pretty desrate. >> paul: a littleconvoluted but i hope it works. >> me, too. suzanne: that's "nightly business report" forednesday, july 2 i'm suzanne prat goodnight everyo, and good night you too, paul! paul: and you as well suzanne. i'm paul kangas wishing all u orthe best of od buys. "nightly biness madeblosbye si tmade posblby: is program was made possible by contributio to your pbs station from vwers like you. thank you. captioning sponsored by wpbt captioned by media access group at bh access.wgbh.org >> we are pbs.

. >> charlie: what es the think is goingo happen that youtub >> ultitely that businesses li youtube are going to make money a the revenuesou can get maybe advertising. >> charlie: do you thi the same for cebook? they're spending money to ha anher friend. >> malcolmays it's all a ponzi scheme and a bubb d that soon or later band width bills argoing to come in and the coanies will go bust and in adam's economyeverything gets more expsive every year and bits, erything gets cheape so whatever youtube ct it ll co half as much a year from w and half othat and never have we seen an i dus instrial economy get cheaper and what volume gets you is attenon and repution and the actual cost so you m lose mone this yea but won't lose mon next year. what malcolm doest underand is google doesn't buy band width whole sale. they're buying dark fiber an printing plants. >> charlie: they go the world putting up these. >> thereosing a lot less than people think and i suspec theyl break even ytube this year and not only isot a bubble but as the advertising model lrns to find licenses the y videois on yoube we

she t trustshat anndersnding of thehe fts will lead ultitely to justice. i would ask my collgues to do ththis. examine aampling, a random sampling of f rases in vavaety ofreas. in casase afte casese, she rollp her sleeves, lrns the acts, applies theawto the facts andnd comeso a a decisioionirrespectie of her inclusioio or personal experiencece. in a a case innvolvin a n york lice oicer she upheld his ght to make remarks.. inin a case brbrough by plainti claiai she had been bumped f fma plane because ofof rache dismissed ththeir case because e law required it and uphel the first right of a prisosoner to wear rligious beadsds under his uniform. in h buttoton cases such as professionalalportshe cacarefull adheres to th facts. >> we have to take a bak. we wilill be rig back. when you're on diet hungry just won qt. but you can outsmart him with weight watchers li. it's weight wawatchers, but it's completelely onlinene customizable totool give you structure tmakeealthier choices wwle resurant guides, cipes, and mobile accss give you flexibilityy live life and lo

but ultitely, e president of the united states is gng to have to come down o these questions and whene does, this battle will look differently. anthen we'll have a tter sense of judging what its real prospects are for passage. we know it's a diffi fight. >> and speing of fights and bales, it's the battle for 2008, of course. the book. you haven't yet reported on next year's battle, but we can't wait read it. >>>straight ahead on "andre mitchell reports,"ndependents ng away fmresident obama. what's behind that trend? what can the preside do to win them bac two top strategists, democra, michl ldn. republican, kevin mden joining us nexon msnbc. lookokat bones just bececause they're inside you doesn't mean theye protected. oh, ladies. let's say you have osteoporosis. dodo you could be losing ne strength. can i get it back? (announc) ask your dococtor how to help treat osteoposi with once-a-montnth actonel. actonel is clinically proven to help increase bostrength to hp prevent fractures. so youanan get back some of whatat you lost. do not take actonel ifou have low bod ccium, severe kidney

pushed for the secrechere was not because t t much wasasone toillegally to y to g al qaeda but that ultitely the history of thisis progogm woulshow how little wadone to get al qaeda?? >> well, i meaean, i tnk one of the revelations thatatame ouin ththat, certnly in the inspector general's repoport, was which is very impoportan i think -- was at the warrantless surveillance program, , which twisted our consnstitutionnto ots, turns out to haveveeen ineffectctive. cording to government t experts who are nonpartisan,n,t did t help i in any seous way in our antiti-terroefforts. so, mean, i think it is possible that the morere we kno about some of f ese prrams the more we'rere going tfind out ey werunnecessary. >>>>peakinof unnecessary, last point here. he washington post" rereported today that t t cia h hid from congress. itas called a technically y oriented i intellince collection effort unrelated to o terrorm suects and that was "thehe wall street j journalversion of this. ould wbe skeptical of these anonous sources suddenly appearing with detailslshat se so widely atat variae from what we thi