[000:00:00;00] ah, the uman city council was transferred to the treasury account , we are offered to take these funds in the form of a subvention, we do not have any project , we have nothing, these are charitable funds, they have nothing to do with the treasury account, so we do not agree with this, with the posing of this question and they themselves have to find the answer as to how this money should be addressed to the people who were victims of april 28 , it is about more than 3 million 617,000, they were collected in three months according to the answer in the head of the condominium now the funds are fully in the community's account, but as gennadiy claims, they planned to spend them on shelters. this was confirmed to us by the first deputy mayor of uman, oleg hanich, but this idea was rejected. during the design of this wonderful building, there was no shelter or bomb shelter , not a bomb shelter, because it is impossible to build a bomb shelter there, and a normal shelter has not been built, we suggested that they build an underground shelter next to their house, that is, wi

the relevant works... so far, there is no money, which is charitable the funds provided to the uman city councilere transferred to the cossack account , we are offered to take these funds in the form of subventions, we have no project, we have nothing, these are charitable funds, they have nothing to do with the treasury account, therefore, we do not agree with this, with the formulation of this question, and they should find an answer themselves, how, how this money should be addressed to the people who were victims of april 28. that's more than 3,617 collected in three months, according to the chairman's response osb, the funds are currently in the community's account in full, however, as gennadiy claims, they were planned to be spent on shelters, this was confirmed to us by the first deputy mayor of uman oleg. hanich, however, abandoned this idea. when designing the reconstruction of this building, there was no shelter or bomb, not a bomb shelter, but a shelter, because it is impossible to build a bomb shelter there, and a normal shelter was not made. we offered them to make a pru shelter nex

the money, which was donated to the uman city council, was transferred to the kazakh account. we are offered to take these in the form of subventions we don't have funds for any project, we don't have anything, these are charity funds , they have nothing to do with the treasury account, so we do not agree with this, with the formulation of this question, and they themselves have to find the answer, how these money to be addressed to people who were victims of april 28, it is about more than 3 m 600... they were collected in three months, according to the answer to the head of the osb, now the funds in full are in the community's account, however, as gennady claims , they planned to spend on shelter, this was confirmed to us by the first deputy mayor of uman, oleh ganich, but this idea was abandoned. when designing the reconstruction of this house, there was no shelter or bomb, not a bomb shelter, but a shelter, because it is impossible to build a bomb shelter there, and the normal one has not been done, we suggested that they build a pru shelter next to their house, that is, w

the money, which was donated to the uman city council, was transferred to the kyzachei account. we are offered to take the form of subventions. we don't have any project , we don't have anything, these are charity funds, they have nothing to do with the treasury account, so we don't agree with this, with the formulation of this question, and they have their own to find an answer as to how this money should be addressed to people who were victims of april 28, it is about more than 3,617, it was collected in three months according to the answer to the head of osb, now the funds are in full amount in the account of the community, however, according to gennady planned to spend them on shelter, this was confirmed to us by the first deputy mayor of uman oleg ganich, but this idea was abandoned. when designing the reconstruction of this building, there was no shelter or bomb shelter, no bomb shelter shelter, because it is impossible to make a bomb shelter there, and a normal shelter has not been made. we offered them to make a pru shelter next to their house, i.e., with all the norms u

documentation for the relevant works yet, the money, which was charitable funds, provided to the uman city councilto take these funds in the form of subventions, we do not have any project, we have nothing , these are charitable funds, they have nothing to do with the treasury account, so... that's why we disagree with with this question, and they themselves have to find the answer, how this money should be addressed to the people who were victims of april 28. it is about more than 3,617, they were collected in three months, according to the response of the head of the osb, now the funds are in full in the community account, however, as gennadiy claims, they were planned to be spent on shelters, this was confirmed to us by the first deputy mayor of uman oleg hannich , however, this idea was abandoned. during the design and reconstruction of this building, there was no shelter or bombosho, not a bomb shelter, but a shelter, because it is impossible to build a bomb shelter there, and a shelter, a normal one, has not been made, we offered them to build a pru shelter next to their house, that is, with

for the relevant work and documentation for the relevant works the funds were provided to the uman city counciley were transferred to the treasury account, they offer us, e-e, if these funds were to be taken in the form of a subvention , we do not have any project, we have nothing, we these are charitable funds, they have nothing to do with the treasury account, they do not agree with this question, and they themselves have to find the answers as to how this money should be addressed to people who were victims of april 28, it is about more than 3 million 617,000 of which was collected for three months, according to the response from the head of the condominium, now the funds are in full in the community's account, but as gennadiy claims, they planned to spend them on shelters. this was also confirmed to us by the first deputy mayor of uman oleg hanich however, this idea was abandoned during design

documentation for the relevant works, there is no money yet, which charitable funds were given to the uman city council were transferred to the treasury account, we are offered, if subventions, to take these funds, we do not have any project, we have nothing, these are charitable funds, they are related to the treasury account they don't have any, that's why we don't agree with this question and they themselves have to find the answers as to how this money should be addressed to the people who were victims of april 28, it's about more than 3 million 617 000 they were collected in three months according to the response from the head of the condominium, the funds are currently in the community's account in full, but as gennadiy claims, they planned to spend them on shelters . this was also confirmed to us by the first deputy mayor of uman, oleg hanich, but this idea was rejected. when designing the reconstruction of this building, there was no shelter or a bomb shelter is not a bomb shelter, because it is impossible to build an ambush shelter there, and a normal shelter is not made, we suggested that the

they all agree that our apartment is considered to be... destroyed, but the commission from the uman city council believes that this apartment is damaged, as they noted in the act of inspection, visual preliminary inspection of object, and they have never been in this apartment. to find out the answer to the main thing residents' questions, when, call the local department of housing and communal services. now, during the examination, she makes comments on the drawings, on the estimates, on the adopted design decisions. designers eliminate them, well, this is work, well, technical work, i.e. giving time to people to show something raw baptismal or raw some private solutions that can change because the expertise will make comments, i think this is absolutely, well, unacceptable, you can’t do that , because time people will see one thing, in fact after the examination it will turn out to be another, so them well, it is necessary to show only the option that will be approved by the examination, so that the draft organization of works is six. ugh, whoever wins the tender will make the design of the wo

experts, they all agree that our apartment is considered destroyed, but the commission from the uman city council believes that this apartment is damaged, which they noted in the inspection report of the visual preliminary inspection of the object, and they have never been to this apartment to find out the answer to the main question residents when we call the local department of housing and communal services, now you are going through a period of time. are there any drawings or raw materials that can change, because the examination makes a comment on this, i find it absolutely unpleasant, it cannot be done here, because now people will see one thing, and after the examination , other facts will come out. therefore, they should be shown only the version that the examination approves of what the project of the organization of the workers of the months , the project of the execution of the works is done by the one who wins the tender, according to the official, in general , uah 76 million was allocated for the restoration of the building , most of it from the state budget, other from local, however

the project documentation for the relevant works. not yet, the money that was donated to the uman city council transferred to the kozachevsky account, we are offered to take these funds in the form of subventions, we have no project, we have nothing, these are charitable funds, they have nothing to do with the treasury account, so we do not agree with this, with the formulation of this question, and they must find the answer themselves, how, how this money to be addressed to people who were victims of april 28, it is about more than 3,617, they were collected in three months, according to the answer to the head of the osb, now the funds are in full amount in the community's account, however, as gennadiy claims, they were planned to be spent on shelter, this was confirmed to us by the first deputy mayor of uman, oleg. night, but this idea was abandoned. when designing the reconstruction of this building, there was no shelter or bomb, not a bomb shelter, but a shelter, because it is impossible to build a bomb shelter there, and a normal shelter was not made. we offered them to make a pru shelter

i affirm that our apartment is considered destroyed, however , the commission from the uman city council believes that this apartment is damaged, as they noted in the inspection report of the visual preliminary inspection of the object, and they have never been to this apartment. to find out the answer to the main question of residents, when, call the local department of housing and communal services. now the examination is taking place, it makes comments on the drawings before the adopted design decisions, the designers eliminate them, well, this is work, well, directly technical work, i.e. giving time to people to show something raw blueprints, some design solutions that may change , because the expertise will make comments, but i consider this absolutely, well, unpleasant, you can’t do it that way, because time people will see one thing, the facts after the examination, something else will come out, so they should be shown only the option that will approve the examination. so that the work organization project is six months, well, the work execution project will be done by the one who