umit is a third hand rumor these writers did not even speak to the man they claimed originally recounted this rumor. there are layers and layers of decades-old hearsay no longer verification and most importantly nothing from the person that was allegedly involved. the most shameful part for the editors to intervene and added to the story last night that the female student declined to be interviewed that she does not recall the incident. i will quote again she does not recall the incident. that is the alleged victim that is the opposite of corroboration and verification. in the legal world it is called skull to tori information. when they provide greater context it has a serious credibility problem. in this case the new york times would undercut its party so we now have the uncorroborated rooted only in the unnamed sources with no direct knowledge of the event and that the alleged victim does not even remember. you know about the new york times. they only print what is fit to print. i just described this situation of collaboration rooted with unnamed sources with no direct knowledge of th