my understanding the way the substitute ordinance p is written there are inconsistent with way the umu is treated this could route in in newer projects actually paid less those that are grandfathered in explain with the planning department analysis. >> it is really complicated so i'll apologize at the beginning and do interrupt me if something is not clear it is possible in the umu to pay a higher rate and this is because there were some set percentages that were added to the various tiers there are 20 tiers abc so if you are doing a dwrairth say in tier a depending on the date of the app it will be 28 or thirty plus or 33 percent whereas anybody that is not grandfathered will always pay 33 percent and if you look at tier c it is the most confusing in tier y c depending on the date of e e application your rate will be 32 or 35 plus or 37 percent and if you're one of the promotions that was not eligible for grandfathering because your new it will be 33 so grandfathering 37 and higher than the new permit rate of 33 and i don't believe that was the intent. >> that was not the intent we're

my understanding the way the substitute ordinance p is written there are inconsistent with way the umus treated this could route in in newer projects actually paid less those that are grandfathered in explain with the planning department analysis. >> it is really complicated so i'll apologize at the beginning and do interrupt me if something is not clear it is possible in the umu to pay a higher rate and this is because there were some set percentages that were added to the various tiers there are 20 tiers abc so if you are doing a dwrairth say in tier a depending on the date of the app it will be 28 or thirty plus or 33 percent whereas anybody that is not grandfathered will always pay 33 percent and if you look at tier c it is the most confusing in tier y c depending on the date of e e application your rate will be 32 or 35 plus or 37 percent and if you're one of the promotions that was not eligible for grandfathering because your new it will be 33 so grandfathering 37 and higher than the new permit rate of 33 and i don't believe that was the intent. >> that was not the intent we're c

the planning codes requirement for a rear yard and permitted obstructions over the street within the umu mixed use zoning district and 68 height and bulk within the castro hill neighborhood that is within a transitioning corridor a variety find one and two industrial building and mixed use development a restaurant and jackson playground are located within the broader neighborhood as well the property itself is a flat lot located on a double corner rectangle shaped on the advisory committee of 16th street between wisconsin the subject lot is a one story 36 thousand square feet that covers the lot to demolish the industrial building and construct a 6 story 60 feet would have had and 45 mixed use development with one hundred plus dwelling units and commercial space and 33 feet of pdr it is a mixed use of 10 three bedrooms and 64 two bedroom and two one bedrooms and studios 24 represents 14 percent of the composition as two bedrooms or larger it is in a u shaped it is a well defined strait wall providing the courtyard towards the interior beginning and second level podium the protection is c

with the affordable housing we can have the affordability of work place that's one of the ideas of umuhen the eastern neighborhoods plan was created can we do more yes, we indeed need to alone carefully had new housing and potrero hill for example come in the mission the fees for transportation are really use in those areas where we are needing to find a new balance between housing and workplace and nicole the protection and continuation of pdrs those are my comments to add to the discussion and basically raising the flag i appreciated everything you're doing there were a number of interesting challenges coming from public comment i want to see the work that will be communicated back to the evening work that the two folks are doing on the particular subject matter >> commissioner vice president richards and a couple of more things the pile on sighed from mr. sanchez the article the chronicle on pdrs a quote by someone a proposed management for the money for square feet the penalties are base size would act as a better detergent and the thought i leave we've heard last week the whole is

and 20 foot projects should be creating treated the same onsite and offsite i think i followed the umu i think in the discussion don't breakdown them separately let's have the watch treat everyone the same be consistent throughout the process and from there i'm running out of time but you'll see from my brothers and sisters here in the room. >> the next speaker card is a.d. twinkie. >> adrian carpenters local 22 field representative years ago the local 22 started and funded city build to bring carpenters into good jobs residents from san francisco we have apprenticeships, we still have supporters ofcy builds in fact, our financial secretary runs the program this is one this san franciscans come into and get a good job and apprenticeship and raise a family we want to keep this we don't our jobs cut we don't need developers and developments killed this is our livelihood we have a lot of programs and jobs that once a job is finished we move on to the next so those are not jobs where you stay in for 25 years sure you can work for 25 years but we have to go from reenforcing emancipation pro

to do that and i object to talk about those changes need to be with respect to pdr uses within the umuone that concludes my remark

to do that and i object to talk about those changes need to be with respect to pdr uses within the umuone that concludes my remarks. >> past events at the board of supervisors there was no historic preservation commission hearing yesterday i believe there is no board of appeals report either. >> good afternoon, commissioners aaron starr for the aaron starr, manager, legislative affairs at the land use the committee heard the clean up that was the downtown height map to have referenced to the transbay redevelopment plan it was heard on february 25th and recommended approval as you recall this item was continued due to supervisor peskin about the transmittal of affordable housing bonus program both items were heard on february 25th to address the conversions the planning department's transmitted the ahbp on friday this week's hearing no denim from the committee and for the to the full board at the full board this week the maurnd assess sponsored by supervisor tang passed its second reading the landmark designation on san marcus the causing passed it second reading and the code enforcemen

to do that and i object to talk about those changes need to be with respect to pdr uses within the umu zone that concludes my remarks. >> past events at the board of supervisors there was no historic preservation commission hearing yesterday i believe there is no board of appeals report either. >> good afternoon, commissioners aaron starr for the aaron starr, manager, legislative affairs at the land use the committee heard the clean up that was the downtown height map to have referenced to the transbay redevelopment plan it was heard on february 25th and recommended approval as you recall this item was continued due to supervisor peskin about the transmittal of affordable housing bonus program both items were heard on february 25th to address the conversions the planning department's transmitted the ahbp on friday this week's hearing no denim from the committee and for the to the full board at the full board this week the maurnd assess sponsored by supervisor tang passed its second reading the landmark designation on san marcus the causing passed it second reading and the code enforcem

you change our approvals one after another after another reasonable requests the nct district or the umu you look at before you grandfather them if beer in a crisis step up and protect us this is what the government is supposed to do protect the underdog. >> like spike i live in district 9 the numbers on the chart of planning department staff has a role i've been talking about projects the mission to the planning approving them and figuring out the amount of security in any into a review of that project is appalling planners are looking at project that require the removal of all tenant in a 6 unit building and not asking questions there's one i filed a dr i said there will be tenants removed my concern they're not looking at plans at the level you deserve that i deserve this is a a that the public deserves i read all the 311 in reading that i look for can this be built without removal of the population there and there is increasing an answer of no and why is the planning department staff not using the same analysis i'm not commissioner meidel kidnapping kidding you you've been paying att

to do that and i object to talk about those changes need to be with respect to pdr uses within the umu zone that concludes my remarks. >> past events at the board of supervisors there was no historic preservation commission hearing yesterday i believe there is no board of appeals report either. >> good afternoon, commissioners aaron starr for the aaron starr, manager, legislative affairs at the land use the committee heard the clean up that was the downtown height map to have referenced to the transbay redevelopment plan it was heard on february 25th and recommended approval as you recall this item was continued due to supervisor peskin about the transmittal of affordable housing bonus program both items were heard on february 25th to address the conversions the planning department's transmitted the ahbp on friday this week's hearing no denim from the committee and for the to the full board at the full board this week the maurnd assess sponsored by supervisor tang passed its second reading the landmark designation on san marcus the causing passed it second reading and the code enforcem

to do that and i object to talk about those changes need to be with respect to pdr uses within the umu zone that concludes my remarks. >> past events at the board of supervisors there was no historic preservation commission hearing yesterday i believe there is no board of appeals report either. >> good afternoon, commissioners aaron starr for the aaron starr, manager, legislative affairs at the land use the committee heard the clean up that was the downtown height map to have referenced to the transbay redevelopment plan it was heard on february 25th and recommended approval as you recall this item was continued due to supervisor peskin about the transmittal of affordable housing bonus program both items were heard on february 25th to address the conversions the planning department's transmitted the ahbp on friday this week's hearing no denim from the committee and for the to the full board at the full board this week the maurnd assess sponsored by supervisor tang passed its second reading the landmark designation on san marcus the causing passed it second reading and the code enforcem

major points we thank the sponsors for the approving the equity and the new version as postage's in the umund the family zone and grandfather rates further and likely due to the speed of the process the first version has some of the grandfathered lowered rates set lower than the existing rates this is corrected and now the existing tier rates of nuke reflects the capacity within the districts today the new version - only to in association with the concessions and the density the project itself so the commission made recommendations the most important ones we would like to drawing your attention to include the following the commission requested additional equity and viability to be grand parented raised and namely the muck is outstanding we're involved in the 2020 fetter effort to stabilize the small businesses the second request that the commission i'd like to directing your attention without the fooebd that demonstrates the specific needs to differentiate the building types the commission asked for the building over one and 20 the same until studies that can for the rates by building heigh

with a footage from 10 to 13.4 square feet w that the suggest property since councilmember johnson umu1959 a formula retail use occupied it the commercial space an has been vacant in the interim the existing formula retail use groceries within a quarter of a mile 22 vacancies out of 200 under the influence establishments they encourage the strengthening the commercial areas to insure the aforementioned continues to serve the needs of the neighborhood and recognized the expansion of opportunities to date p.m. including numerous letters of support to establish a grocery at south van ness the neighbors are excited about the project and want american people approval without further detail outreach of the mission district and has engaged saint peter's and the quarter and the representatives regarding the can in addition, sponsorship and the grocery outlet has corporate two murals with the elementary community the youth development organization involved with the first mural an additional meeting occurred on april 6th with a various nonprofits the project is continent with the planning code t

mission nct like other other projects subject to the grand parenting but totally different from the umu only on grandfather and that's correct. >> all right. thank you for the clarification let's hear a roll call vote on supervisor peskin amendment. >> supervisor peskin amendment supervisor peskin supervisor wiener and chair cohen. >> thank you all right. amendment passes unanimously supervisor kim i think you have an amendment to discuss you wanted to propose or if you could restate it. >> an amendment suggested bets the mayor's office of housing and community development around the small sit acquisition how you can sell our onsite obligation i believe the city attorney will read into the record. >> we don't have it in front of us not written down. >> please into the mike and deputy city attorney kate stacy and in section 4415 ms. hayward upgraded an amendment i'm suggesting clarifying language that language is not before you in written form. >> is there a substantive change. >> a change that makes that consistent with the small sites something that the see macy's put before the planni