russia deliberately ignores in the case of ukraine against the russian federation at the un international court of justice, the european union joined in this the press service of the court reported. i will remind you that in march of this year, the un international court of justice ordered russia to stop hostilities in ukraine, but the aggressor country ignores this decision show trial of captured defenders of azov, the occupiers are planning to commit another war crime on the independence day of ukraine in the temporarily occupied mariupol, they report to the main intelligence agency that the russians want to copy the format of the nuremberg tribunal, it will be held on those held for the alleged ideology of nazism . in order, the surviving premises of the mariupol chamber philharmonic are being converted, iron cages are being installed there, which will place the ukrainian military, our intelligence officers do not rule out that the russians may launch a pinpoint missile attack on the premises and try to once again shift the blame for the crime committed to ukraine . happiness from the occupation of the

assistance provided the european union has joined the case of ukraine against russia at the un international court of justiced in the court's press service . kyiv accuses our state of genocide, while ukraine filed a lawsuit against russia on february 26, our state claims that moscow abuses its participation in the convention and transformed it a fabricated reason for the attack is deliberate killing thanks to the serious harm to ukrainians within the case already on march 16, the un international court of justice obliged russia to stop hostilities, but this decision is ignored in the kremlin, a pregnant military medic from the rivne region, maryana monova, was held in a colony by the russians when it began a full-scale war in mariupol, she saved soldiers and civilians shortly before the capture , she informed her family that she was pregnant, and for almost five months there has been no news from her to save mariana, her relatives are asking for publicity tsn correspondent tetyana khomych will continue this topic that someone will knock on the window and say that they live and exchanged their daughter . mrs.

the prohibition of the financing of terrorism, and in 2015 one of our lawsuits at the un international court of justiceis precisely about the prohibition of the financing of terrorism. it is not a pity that international law through people's courts has been going on for a very, very long time. as you can see, it has been 8 years, but i i am sure that we could win this lawsuit. but as a result of this lawsuit, we should receive not only compensation, but also restrictions on russian rights, including in international organizations , including. e international forums, but this should be our key goal according to these international laws to limit russia , uh, american legislation has its own definition, it is sufficiently detailed, legally worked out, since all terrorists have already been caught there, russia perfectly understands that this is not only a political attack on her is not only a special attack. well, after all, putin does not want to be the president of a terrorist state, and they understand perfectly well if they are recognized as such . in general, it is not that they are not a global play

approaching, so this principle must be fully observed by another ally of ukraine at the un international court of justice, the european union has joined the case against russia on charges of genocide and has already submitted relevant information to the competent authorities in our representation in the eu. they have already thanked brussels for their concern. russia to stop hostilities as early as march 16. the kremlin refused to implement its traditional manners. the russians were preparing at least two puppet governments that they were going to install in kyiv. after the seizure of power, the washington post writes about this with reference to sources in the ukrainian security forces. the first was to be formed around the fugitive president viktor yanukovych, the second could include former yanukovych government officials, in particular ex-regional oleg tsarev, the publication suggests that putin simply wanted to have a choice of russian soldiers on the people of kharkiv are forced to fight despite their desire to return home, this is evidenced by the audio interception of ukrainian intelligence offic

convention on the prohibition of financing terrorism and in 2015 one of our lawsuits is the un international court of justice is precisely about the ban on the financing of terrorism. unfortunately, international law through people's courts is very, very long and it has been going on for 8 years, as you can see, but i am sure that we could win this lawsuit. but as a result of this lawsuit, we we must receive not only compensation, but also restrictions on russian rights, including in international organizations, including i hope that with regard to the vote, i do not know whether it is there in the security council or there in other e-e international forums, but this should be our key goal for these international the right to limit russia, er, american legislation has its own definition , it is sufficiently detailed, legally elaborated , since all terrorists have already been caught there, russia perfectly understands that this is not only a political blow, er, it is not only a special strike well, after all, putin does not want to be the president of a terrorist state and they understand perfectly well if t

financing of terrorism, and regarding this issue, ukraine has filed a lawsuit at the international court of justice of the unit has been taken into consideration and it is certain that it is definitely responsible for the financing of terrorism russia can bear it, but it still depends on the cargo that was the financing of terrorism in the so-called dpr and lpr, that is, on the eve of a full-scale russian invasion, and the un mechanism that provided the opportunity to come to there is rather no responsibility for state terrorism in cases such as e.e. in the case of russian aggression, but here other mechanisms of the un and not only the un must come into effect because the actions of russia have a clear composition of a crime against humanity, there is a clear composition of the crime of war crimes and maybe if in for ukraine , if ukraine is able to prove it, it is also the composition of the crime of genocide, but with regard to preventing and countering terrorism, there are no really strong mechanisms for prosecuting it in this crime, some countries russia is already being declared a state sponsor and a sp

it, and there is this in russia, so there are other ways, e.e. the international court of justice there are many questions about the un. well, not like that. it is not a hundred, but there are dozens of precedents in international history when countries appealed to the international court of justice with a request that it make a decision, yes or no, the main thing here is how to formulate this question, but a lawyer, i think they will be able to do it easily to do it correctly without any incursions into russia, that is, you know, leave aside the question of aggression there, a violation of international law, because this is already a policy, and that is what we, er, well, the support base of the un is at least a lot. it does not increase, no, no harm. ask the question just like that, very correctly and neatly, uh, there are such documents, there is a declaration of velmaty, the letter is valid for, uh, this was a difficult decision, uh, what is the opinion of any court and is it right or wrong, thank you, thank you, there are experienced lawyers sitting there, they are outside of politics, and it seems to me that the

than 10,000 criminals who will need to be brought to justice for their crimes against the ukrainian people, the international criminal court of the un will not be able to do this if there is a tribunal for crimes of aggression, we will again limit ourselves to about a dozen defendants. but people will want commanders and lieutenants and soldiers who committed these crimes to bear responsibility and they will want the ukrainian judicial system to be authorized to prosecute these persons a-a william the rwandan jumper considered 85 cases related to the former yugoslavia 161 according to the general prosecutor's office of ukraine in ukraine there are almost 22,000 cases and every day the number of committed war crimes increases by 100,200 as this court will cope with such a huge amount of work of people there are a number of models that we ukrainians can use and i 'm glad that you mentioned rolanda because it was a great example for rolanda is pleased with un security was created an international special tribunal but the rwandans also involved two or three additional mechanisms the rwandans had their own internal prosecutions and they

the military rank of major of justice and banned from holding positions in government bodies for a period of for 3 years, the european union provided the un international courtith its information on the case of ukraine against the russian federation, it concerns the genocide of the ukrainian people by the russian occupiers. thus, the case of ukraine against russia is already turning into the world against russia , more than 40 countries of the world have expressed their intention to support the accusations of the russian federation in the genocide of the ukrainian people the congress of scientists and representatives of law schools elected a new member of the high council of justice, he became doctor of law dmytro lukyanov, and we will talk about him in more detail lukyanov, head of the yaroslav the wise national university of law department and known as a person who is very empathetic and always ready to support even in spite of professionalism and integrity, for example, as a member of the competitive commission of the constitutional court, he voted for judge oleksandr sibigo, who owns a lot of elite property of dubious origin, the value of which is does n